A Thatched Roof by Beverley Nichols

StuckinaBook All , , , 11 Comments

Yes, my love of Beverley continues apace – and I decided recently to pick up the next of his Allways trilogy, A Thatched Roof (1933). I rushed through, and adored, the Merry Hall series last year – but stalled after the first of the earlier Allways trilogy, Down the Garden Path. Would I prefer this one?

In short, yes. I certainly enjoyed Down the Garden Path, but it didn’t live up to my love for Merry Hall et al. A Thatched Roof definitely felt like a step in the right direction – with more humour, more rounding of the eccentric neighbours, and, crucially, less about gardening. Because here he moves inside.

The low lintels of the cottage have many disadvantages, but they have one supreme advantage. They afford an immediate topic of conversation. They make things start, quite literally, with a bang.

And so starts Beverley. I enjoy reading about gardens and gardening when it doesn’t rely on expertise or references to visuals that don’t appear – but I found Down the Garden Path a bit too heavy on gardening and light on narrative. I don’t mind the ratio so much when he is talking about putting a window into his study, or knocking down a section of wall and finding a surprise alcove. I love reading about interiors and renovations. I also love reading Beverley get snobbish on the topic of other people’s taste, because it is delightfully catty, and the outrage he directs on this topic to the people who rent it from him for a while is quite vicious, in a harmless sort of way. Great fun.

The locals begin to come to life more. There is Mrs M., the local busybody and interferer; there is Undine, who swears by water diviners and thinks everything heavenly (as long as it doesn’t smack of modernity). There are a cast of lesser characters, including a wonderfully lazy and cross housekeeper – none of them shine as brightly as the fond antagonists of Merry Hall, but they offer their own entertainment.

Not least when the topic of electric light comes up. This takes up much of the final section of the book – as they debate whether or not it should come to the village (and then Beverley rebels and gets it all for himself, listing for us the wonders of illuminating statues and stairways). He doesn’t care at all that others can’t share his electricity – indeed, he is not always the most likeable of people, but he writes beautifully and we can charitably assume that a lot of what he writes is self-lampooning or exaggeration. Hopefully…

I bought this book way back in 2004, on the strength of the title and the age of the book (and perhaps, had I flicked through the first few pages, the reference to The Provincial Lady Goes Further). It’s good to have finally read it – and I’m sure I’ll move on to the third of the trilogy before too long. I don’t know if I’ll revisit the Allways books, but it certainly fitted the mood I was in at the time, and that sort of dependability is to be cherished. Now, if only I had an edition with Rex Whistler’s illustrations on the dustjacket…

Stonecliff by Robert Nathan

StuckinaBook All , , , 5 Comments

Robert Nathan is one of those names now known only, it seems, to people who’ve enjoyed the films based on his work. Portrait of Jennie and The Bishop’s Wife are both, apparently, regarded as classics in the movie world – but less known is their author, who was extremely prolific. I love his novels, which take only a couple of hours to read but transport the reader away for a while. When I read about Stonecliff (1967), I knew I had to get hold of a copy.

Stonecliff is the house of Edward Granville, noted writer. He is a recluse, and Stonecliff is isolated on a cliff in California, but he accepts a visit from Michael Robb – the narrator. He has been commissioned to write the great man’s biography, and is allowed to stay.

I have been sitting here at my desk with the last page of my book in front of me – my book, still untitled, the biography of the novelist Edward Granville. It is all done, complete, with names and dates and places, facts gathered from many sources, including Stonecliff itself. And yet in a real sense it is not done at all, for I know that the life of the book itself has escaped me; the mystery that baffled me then eludes me still.

That’s the opening of the novel, and consider me hooked. The greatest mystery is Granville’s wife – absent from the house – and the young woman who is there and whom Robb finally meets; she is beautiful, captivating, and elusive. He gradually begins to suspect that she is the creation of Granville – has he called her to life with his pen? And what exactly is their relationship? How should the biographer interpret what he sees, and can he get to the bottom of the mystery?

I rushed through the book gleefully. Nathan is not a great prose stylist, but there is also nothing obstructive in his writing – and he is an expert at conveying atmosphere. So I wouldn’t want to quote many of the lines out loud, but he builds wonder and romance (in the traditional sense of the word) so adeptly that I loved my short stay in Stonecliff. It’s the fourth novel I’ve read by him, and I’ll certainly seek out more. They so perfectly suit certain moods. And if you happen to be in America, you can snap them up very easily.

Stuck in a Book’s Weekend Miscellany

StuckinaBook All 11 Comments

I’m going to be spending the weekend with family, which is the nicest way to spend a weekend. Apparently it’s going to rain for much of it – which has been very welcome, but isn’t ideal for a BBQ. But I’m certainly not going to complain, after the heatwave we’ve been having. I hope you have a wonderful weekend, and here’s a book, a blog post, and a link to help you do so…

1.) The link – this oral history of The Parent Trap (1990s remake) is the article you didn’t know you needed, but also sort of did know you needed.

2.) The book – I love Daunt Books choices of books, and their designs. How lovely does this edition of Cassandra at the Wedding by Dorothy Baker look? If I didn’t already have an (unread) Virago Modern Classic then I’d be snapping it up. Anybody read it? (You can find out more at their website.)

3.) The blog post – my friend Tom (who runs the Indie Fic Lit blog) has written really interestingly about the benefits to publishers and authors of buying directly from their websites – something I hadn’t really thought of before, and which I will from now on!

A reading catch-up

StuckinaBook All , , , , 7 Comments

As usual, I’ve fallen behind a bit with the books I’ve been intending to review – and so, partly for A Century of Books, partly just to mention some others, here are some books that I’ve read in the past few months, in brief.

Girl with Dove (2018) by Sally Bayley

Sally Bayley was my DPhil supervisor and we’ve kept in touch since, now and then, so I was certainly intrigued to read her childhood memoir (and thank you for the review copy). The subtitle, ‘A life built by books’, was also calculated to intrigue me. It tells of Sally’s fraught upbringing – as the bio says, she put herself into care at 14 – and does so with the confusion and melding of worlds that a child would face. So the characters in the books she loves (Agatha Christie, Jane Eyre etc.) elide with the real relatives and figures in her life. The whole book is a touching maelstrom, completely unlike traditional memoirs. You might end not really knowing a huge amount of facts, but you’ll certainly understand how it all felt.

Golden Hill (2016) by Francis Spufford

I didn’t think I’d like this book for book group, and I was right. It’s set in 18th-century New York, as the main character turns up with a cheque to cash for a large sum of money. On it wanders, with his various exploits, in a sort of half-18th-century-half-not tone that I found frustrating. And, frankly, I found the whole thing quite dull and a little confusing. I’d rather just read a book from the 18th century.

Leadon Hill (1927) by Richmal Crompton

I know a few Crompton fans say this is their favourite of her books, and the last few of hers I’d read had been a bit sub-par. This one is about (of course) a small village – and the ways their worlds change when an exotic and bohemian Italian woman starts renting one of the cottages. I don’t think I was quite in the right mood to read Crompton when I did, and this isn’t among my favourites, but I have read 28 of her novels now, so perhaps it’s just a question of a surfeit? Bless her, she doesn’t vary her canvas much.

When Heaven Is Silent (1994) by Ron Dunn

I bought this years ago, and have dipped in and out over time. It’s about living the Christian life through times of difficulties – written largely because of Dunn’s experience of losing his son to suicide. Nothing close to that dreadful has happened in my life, so I read it more out of interest than for personal help – but I think I’d return to it if I needed that help for any reason, because Dunn writes well, sensitively, and with a great knowledge of the Bible and of God’s nature.

Family Man (1998) by Calvin Trillin

I read this on holiday earlier in the year, and really enjoyed it, but had almost forgotten it by the time I got to the last page. It’s a collection of essays about his family over the years – and a little on how he feels about mentioning his children, as they get older. It’s all fairly incidental, and it’s only Trillin’s wonderfully engaging and warm tone that made it such an enjoyable (if forgettable) book.

Tea or Books? #61: Do We Care What Characters Eat? and The French Lieutenant’s Woman vs Remarkable Creatures

StuckinaBook Tea or Books? , , 8 Comments

John Fowles, Tracy Chevalier, and eating in books – Lyme and limes, if you will!


 
Sorry for a bit of a delay (because I had to read two quite long books) – and advance apologies for the delay before our next episode, as Rachel moves house and completes her dissertation. Thanks for bearing with us! In this episode, we use a recommendation from my friend Rachel (a different one) and ask about characters and food. In the second half, we compare John Fowles’ The French Lieutenant’s Woman with Tracy Chevalier’s Remarkable Creatures. Do let us know your thoughts on either!

You can support the podcast and get various rewards at Patreon, or visit our iTunes page. Rate and review if you can work out how and would like to!

The books and authors we mention in this episode are:

The Brontes by Juliet Barker
Letters by Virginia Woolf
The Diary of a Bookseller by Shaun Bythell
Famous Five series by Enid Blyton
Malory Towers series by Enid Blyton
Swallows and Amazons by Arthur Ransome
The Debt to Pleasure by John Lanchester
Five Quarters of the Orange by Joanne Harris
Chocolat by Joanne Harris
The Edible Woman by Margaret Atwood
The Cazalet Chronicles by Elizabeth Jane Howard
The Sea, The Sea by Iris Murdoch
Edith Wharton
Cranford by Elizabeth Gaskell
The Heat of the Day by Elizabeth Bowen
Provincial Lady series by E.M. Delafield
To The Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl
Matilda by Roald Dahl
The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake by Aimee Bender
Girl With a Pearl Earring by Tracy Chevalier
Golden Hill by Francis Spufford
The Luminaries by Eleanor Catton
Patricia Brent, Spinster by Herbert Jenkins
Speaking of Love by Angela Young
Concert Pitch by Theodora Benson
Mr Pim Passes By by A.A. Milne
Four Days’ Wonder by A.A. Milne
Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell
Animal Farm by George Orwell

A tour of my books

StuckinaBook All 29 Comments

When I moved into my little flat, almost a year ago, quite a few people asked if I intended to give a tour of my bookcases. I absolutely did intend to, but somehow it never quite happened. Now is the moment! It’s certainly not a new flat anymore, and it feels almost like another lifetime ago that I shared with three other people and most of my books were elsewhere. But, hey, here they are nonetheless!

The front door of my flat opens on the ground floor, onto a tiny hall and a staircase, so as we ascend the stairs we come across the first bookcases. On a little platform halfway up the stairs are…

The Persephone books, suitably enough, are the first things you see. I feel like I want to add that I took this photo a few weeks ago, and I’ve since (finally!) painted over the paint effects the previous occupants had on the wall, that weren’t to my taste.

Turn the corner, and a tall, thin bookcase snuck into a corner holds Persephone’s aunt – Virago:

It also houses my pile of Slightly Foxed journals. To the right: a painting of Sherpa by Our Vicar’s Wife. (I haven’t used that nickname in a while – for those not in the know, that’s my Mum!)

We’ll head across the little hallway and into the living room/dining room, which is where most of the books are. This angle might be familiar to those who follow my instagram, as it’s the easiest one to get the most in.

The bookcase wallpaper tends to give people a double take – I have a lot of books, but not that many. On the mantelpiece are my A.A. Milne books; on the windowsill are some of my books about reading – and the bookcase has my ‘old books’ starting at A. I divide my books into ‘old’ and ‘new’ which is very vague, but mostly hardback vs paperback. Essentially, the prettier books are in the living room.

We’ve turned around, and here are the rest of the old books – down the grey bookcase and then down the step-style one. Yes, it goes anti-clockwise, because I’m maverick. The step bookcase (I don’t quite know how to describe it…) is one I’ve had since I was about 15, and makes a perfect room divide. Not least because…

You can keep books on the other side of it! This bookcase has the most variety – it houses theology, poetry, plays, misc non-fiction, and the entire bottom row is books about Virginia Woolf, and her letters and diaries. The novels are elsewhere, but it shows that I do have quite a Woolf obsession.

Let’s turn around, and face the wall opposite that book wallpaper.

This is the dining space of the living area, which doubles up as my office when I’m working from home. Two of the bookcases (the two on the left) are biography and autobiography, alphabetical by subject. The third bookcase has two shelves of essays, two shelves of misc lit (theory etc.), and two shelves of letters.

The final wall of the room (opposite the sofa) has my little TV, but also – of course – some more bookcases (kindly put into the wall by Our Vicar, aka Dad). Here’s where I have all my E.M. Delafield and Richmal Crompton books.

We’ll pop our head into the kitchen – because there are, of course, some books in there too.

It’s the rest of my books about books and reading. They were on a windowsill in the kitchen, but got quite damp there. (I’m enjoying the spring and summer, for my books’ sake – it does get a little bit damp on some of the external walls in winter, so I may have to amp up my dehumidifer situ this winter.)

Scoot back through the living room, and head on into my (indeed, the only) bedroom. I haven’t gone subtle on the paint colour – I really love this shade of blue, and it makes me so happy to wake up and see it.

As I said, in here we have the paperbacks and newer fiction (and, tucked down in one corner, the children’s books). On top of the first set of shelves are my British Library Crime Classics and my Agatha Christies.

And that’s the end of the tour! I hope you’ve enjoyed having a mosey around my flat (and are perhaps relieved that I don’t have bookcases in the bathroom). There’s not really room for any more bookcases, though I’m mulling squeezing one into the living room that would mean I couldn’t quite open the door fully… watch this space.

Which books have I given up on?

StuckinaBook All 38 Comments

I don’t often give up on books. I think that’s largely because I select the books I want to read relatively carefully, and also because I’d rather speed-read to the end of a book and add it to my list than give up – particularly if I’m over halfway. People often say that life’s too short to read books you’re not enjoying, and I daresay that’s true, but I’m still relatively young (more relative by the day…) so perhaps have yet to feel the impending pressure of how few books I’ll actually manage to read in the rest of my life. Frankly, it’s mostly because I like putting the books I’ve read on a list. I love lists.

But I did give up on a book this week, pretty quickly, and it got me thinking about the books I’ve given up on over the years. I thought I’d go through them, looking at how far I got and why I gave up. (And, since they don’t end up on my lists, who knows how many others I gave up on and forgot about? Incidentally, I’m not including books that I never finished because they got lost in the pile of current reads – these were all intentional give-ups.)

 

The book: The Extraordinary Life of A.A. Milne by Nadia Cohen

How far did I get: c.40 pages

This is the one that kicked off the post. I hadn’t realised a new biography of AAM was out last year, and was quite excited to go to the library and get it. My excitement quickly dissipated. It was written in a sort of tabloidy style (everyone was ‘outraged’ or ‘never forgave’ etc.) and generally quite over the top. Then Cohen referred to his ‘stories about a family of rabbits’. She was referring to The Rabbits – sketches about a group of amateur sportsmen, so-called because ‘rabbits’ is slang for amateur sportsmen. How poor was her research? There was no referencing whatsoever, and – more worryingly – Milne’s autobiography wasn’t even listed in the tiny bibliography. I suspect she read Ann Thwaite’s excellent biography, abbreviated and tabloided it, and churned it out in time for the Goodbye Christopher Robin film last year.

 

The book: We Need to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver

How far did I get: c.50 pages

This was all the rage a few years ago, and I made an impulse purchase in a supermarket – which had a big stand of them. Not my usual sort of novel, being quite traumatic, but I thought I’d give it a go as I’d heard such good things. Well, I never made it as far as the traumatic bit. It was so poorly written – so over written – that I just couldn’t continue. I recall that I gave up at the sentence (while the narrator is having a bath and is worried that the hot water might run out) that ‘it permeated my ablutions with disquiet’. Good lord.

 

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

How far did I get: c.20 pages

I’m sure Lolita is brilliant. There are enough people who rave about Nabokov whose opinions I respect that I don’t doubt he is one of the twentieth century’s great writers. But I cannot read about paedophilia, particularly inside the mind of a paedophile. I recognise that that limitation is with me rather than with the literature, and I certainly don’t believe in censoring books (except on quality – there’s no reason that badly written books should be published) but this crosses one of my lines in the sand.

 

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo by Steig Larsson

How far did I get: c.100 pages

This was for book group. And, of course, everyone was reading it a few years ago – and watching the movie, and then watching the next movie. I wasn’t excited about it, because I don’t love gruesome books. But the reason I actually gave up was because it was so deathly dully. It read like an Argos catalogue – every item mentioned getting its brand name and value. (For good measure, I did get one description of torture and murder that haunts me still.)

 

The Silkworm by Robert Galbraith

How far did I get: c.100 pages

I love the Harry Potter series, and I was certainly very open to reading more by J.K. Rowling, under a pseudonym or otherwise. And a murder mystery sounded perfect for her, since many of the Harry Potter books are essentially mysteries – and she’s quite brilliant at pacing in those. But The Silkworm… again, I just found it really boring. And rather gruesome, yes, but it was the tedium that put me off.

 

Gone to Earth by Mary Webb

How far did I get: 1.5 pages

Never have I given up on a book so quickly. It was just so astonishingly bad. You can read more about my thoughts (and my annotations for those 1.5 pages) in a post from the time. I got lots of lovely comments on it, and one (Anonymous, naturally) telling me that “you probably weren’t worthy of reading it anyway”.

Do share which books you’ve given up on – and if you write a blog post about it, pop it in the comments.

Anybody Can Do Anything by Betty Macdonald

StuckinaBook All , , , 10 Comments

It’s been a while since I listened to all the Betty Macdonald books on audio, courtesy of review copies from Post-Hypnotic Press, and every now and then I remember to write about them. Anybody Can Do Anything (1950) is the third – after The Egg and I about chicken farming and The Plague and I about life in a TB hospital. This is the most general so far, and also my favourite of the four autobiographical books Macdonald wrote.

It takes place during the Great Depression, where jobs are scarce and Betty is desperate. So desperate, in fact, that she takes the advice of her go-getter sister Mary. Mary insists that anybody can do anything, and specifically that anybody can get any sort of job. Which is how, in the era of very little employment, Macdonald manages to secure (and lose) a vast number of jobs.

As usual with Macdonald, she meanders around the topic for a little too long before getting into it – each of her books would be slightly better with the first chapter lopped off – but once we’re in the sway, it’s hilarious. She works as a photo tinter, she works a stenographer, she works as a typist. She has various office jobs, she gets involved in a pyramid scheme, she organises the offices for a mining company – and gets in trouble for putting all the maps in size order, rather than by place or contract. Often we don’t see quite how she leaves these jobs, but there are dozens of them – each time, Macdonald describes her own ineptitudes extremely amusingly. She has self-deprecating down so well that you’d swear she was British.

This does all eventually lead to her sister forcing her to try writing, so there was definitely a happy ending. But the pinnacle of the book is a lengthy section that is creepy rather than simply an amusing catastrophe. It concerns a woman whose name I can’t remember but was something like Doritos. She turns up a shift of folding papers and putting them in envelopes (if I recall) and talks wildly, roots through Macdonald’s bag, and later starts stalking her. That doesn’t do this section justice – she is built up like something in a suspense novel, and it shows an element to Macdonald’s writing that I hadn’t seen elsewhere. Masterfully done, and leaves us with nervous laughter rather than the empathetic, happy laughter of the rest.

Macdonald’s personal life is curiously absent from the page. Her time in the TB clinic is glossed over in a sentence (understandably, given the amount of time she spends on it in The Plague and I), but she also acquires a husband almost incidentally – and her children are scarcely mentioned at all. Perhaps she didn’t want to dilute what focus the book does has, but it is bizarre to remember that they exist, in the middle of some amusing exploits in an office Macdonald is comically ill-suited to.

As before, Heather Henderson does a brilliant job narrating this – I can’t imagine Betty Macdonald in any other hands now. Heartily recommended.

Excellent Intentions by Richard Hull

StuckinaBook All , , , , 6 Comments

Who doesn’t love the British Library Crime Classics? I’m amassing them far faster than I can read them, but earlier this month I did read Excellent Intentions (1938) by Richard Hull, which is one of their more recent publications. I was beguiled by the description of it being an unusual twist on the detective novel. And the reason it’s a twist is because we start in the courtroom, with the accused in the dock…

“May it please your lordship – members of the jury.” Anstruther Blayton rose to his feet and, as was his habit, moved some papers that were near him in an unnecessary and fussy manner. At the age of fifty-two he was, he knew, comparatively young to have been selected by the Attorney-General to act as leader in a trial which was arousing a certain amount of public interest. Even though he had been known for some time as a leading K.C. on the circuit, it was his chance and he meant to make the most of it.

That’s the opening paragraph, throwing us right into the midst of the trial. But – crucially – we do not know who the accused is.

As the trial continues, the scenes described run parallel to it. So, as the brilliantly-named Anstruther Blayton talks us through the scene of the death, we then jump to seeing it – Mr Cargate, taking snuff on a train, and dying almost immediately. Cargate is that stereotypical murder victim from this genre – universally disliked, and rightly so. All manner of people are suspected, from his household staff to the inheritors to a group of people involved in (of all things) the stamp trade.

I don’t know if Hull was a philatelist or simply did a lot of research, but buckle up to learn a huge amount about stamps. Unless you already know it, in which case… well, I hope he got the details right. I could have done with perhaps less of this information, not least because I spent the whole time marvelling that anybody could care whether or not a particular stamp did or did not have a dot of ink in a particular place. But Hull does a good job of immersing us in this world.

Hull writes with wit, which always helps this sort of novel, and many of his characters are very vivid – particularly in the silent sparring within the courtroom. The actual plot seems like it might be rather flimsy, but don’t form your opinions until the final page… and perhaps not even then. A worthy addition to the BLCC series.

Stuck in a Book’s Weekend Miscellany

StuckinaBook All 11 Comments

This week has been long. And sometimes a bit wearying. It started off with a nasty cold and feeling very sorry for myself. It ended with Trump coming to the UK with his hideous rhetoric about immigrants and general terribleness – I went to Blenheim Palace to protest. He truly is a terrible, terrible human being, and I’m ashamed that the leaders of my country were so sycophantic to him – though proud of the protests that the British people have put on in response.

Anyway. Ugh. Here’s a book, a link, and a blog post to distract ourselves…

1.) The blog post – is on Medium, which feels very millennial of me (is Medium still a thing?) It’s about the buy-out of Capitol Hill Books by the employees and friends of the eccentric owner Jim Toole. I’ve been a couple times, and love it, and the post is quite amusing. I’m so pleased this bookstore is sticking around, so close to the political heart of the US.

2.) The book – where did I hear about Avid Reader by Robert Gottlieb? Can’t remember, but it’s another book about reading (and an autobiography) that I will inevitably buy at some point. With his heritage working at Simon and Schuster, Alfred Knopf, and The New Yorker, how could this not be good?

3.) The link – with Trump on the mind, here’s a link for the best places to donate to help migrant and refugee families at the US/Mexico border. It’s from a few weeks ago, when the situation was a little different, but they could still do with all the compassion and help that we can give.