A Bookshop in Algiers by Kaouther Adimi – #ABookADayInMay – Day 25

Holding up A Bookshop in Algiers in the garden on a summer afternoon

The heatwave continues, and I spent some time in the garden reading A Bookshop in Algiers (2017) by Kaouther Adimi. It was originally published as Nos richesses and translated by Chris Andrews as Our Riches, so I’m not sure why the title changed when it appeared in the UK – but I have to admit that ‘bookshop’ in the title is what made me pick it up in a secondhand bookshop a few years ago. So perhaps the marketing folk know what they’re doing.

The novella is about Edmond Charlot, a publisher and bookseller in Algiers, Algeria. As I kept reading the book, and seeing so many real French authors, I began to wonder if Charlot were a real person… and of course he is. Which does raise the issue of novels about real people – particular in Adimi’s case, where she tells his story through diary entries. Making up a real person’s diary is a minefield, but I went along for the ride. Perhaps it helps that the entries are so short.

Through Charlot’s perspective, we see his ambition to open up a bookshop and cultural meeting point in Algiers, called Les Vraies Richesses, and to start publishing some of the greatest names in French literature. He is apparently best known for his working relationship with Albert Camus, and there were other names that I recognised – Giono, Vercors, Gide, Saint-Exupéry – as well as many that are doubtless familiar to people with a better knowledge of Francophone literature than I. He appears to have spent some time in prison, thanks to Gertrude Stein…

March 17, 1942
Just out of prison. A month inside! Thanks to Gertrude Stein who had the bright idea of declaring, in an interview with the BBC: “I have a very dynamic publisher in Algiers, who is resisting…” Vichy already had me under surveillance. Three days after the book was printed, the police came for me in the small hours of the morning.

[…]

This unfortunate episode has held up the publication of Gerturde Stein’s book, but the store stayed open, thanks to Manon and other friends. it’s clearer than ever to me that without friendship there could be no Éditions Charlot. It all depends, essentially, on circumstances, friendship, and encounters.

Before each section of diary entries, there is a page or two summarising the state of Algeria in the time period – from the 1930s through to the 1960s. Now, if I am ignorant about French writing, that’s nothing to my ignorance about the geopolitics of Algeria through the 20th century. In Adimi’s hands, I feel like I’ve had a quick but first-class education. She wears her knowledge and research lightly, and perhaps it’s because we see all these famous names and big events through the eyes of one individual, who is as preoccupied with rude letters and paper shortages as he is with the world stage. Later in the novella, there is an astonishing section on a brutal episode I had never heard of – the massacre of Algerians in Paris in 1961, by police. It is related with a fierce poeticism, and is incredibly striking.

The parallel story is in 2017. Through a friend of his father’s, a young man called Ryad is hired to throw away everything left in Les Vraies Richesses, paint the walls, and get it ready to be turned into a shop selling beignets. Though it hasn’t been a bookshop for years, it is still a members’ library, and its final custodian, Abdullah, is living next door. Ryad doesn’t like books at all – the idea of print reminds him of mites – and he is not at all uneasy about his task. But he finds the community are friendly but unhelpful. There is allegedly no paint to be bought in the whole region.

Over his time there, Ryad gets to know Adbullah and other locals. Adimi is too subtle to make him have a Damascan Road turn towards literature, but there is a subtle transformation to him nonetheless. Perhaps it’s because of my well-documented suspicion of historical fiction, but it was the contemporary Ryad scenes that I most enjoyed. He is not your usual literary hero, but I warmed to him and his gradual development.

Despite, as I say, not loving historical fiction, and despite some queries about making up the diaries of a real person – I did really enjoy reading A Bookshop in Algiers. It is quietly powerful about the abuse faced by Algerians over the years, as well as a fascinating insight into a literary circle and the resilience of people who simply love literature. It is not a sentimental book, and it is all the better for that. A lovely way to spend a sunny evening, and perhaps the beginnings of an education about a country and culture I know very little about.

They by Helle Helle – #ABookADayInMay – Day 24

A copy of They in a sunlit park

The UK has entered something of a heatwave, and I read They (2018) by Helle Helle entirely outside, in a couple of different parks in Oxford. It was originally in Danish, and translated by Martin Aitken – the first time, in fact, that I remember seeing the translator’s name on the cover.

I bought They earlier this year with a voucher from some friends for Caper, an excellent little bookshop in East Oxford, having been beguiled by a review in the Guardian. It’s about a 16-year-old girl and her mother (both unnamed) living in a small Danish community. We don’t know what happened to the father, and we don’t know all that much about the two figures – known usually as ‘she’ or ‘her’ and ‘her mother’. Instead, we are just immersed in the ordinary world they live together, with the only clue of instability being the number of previous houses they have lived in. Some of the short sections deal with previous homes, and we usually don’t know quite why they have been so temporary.

The girl has the same preoccupations of most 16-year-olds. Her school, her friends, including a new one called Tove who is a little wilder and exciting than the ones she is used to. There are her older friends, some boys who are starting to intrigue her, and the neighbourly people she bumps into each day. But most of all there is her mother. They are close with an unspoken intensity. In less subtle hands than Helle’s, we might know if this is an unhealthily close relationship – but she just shows it to us, without judgement.

The story is mundane, every day, with little to disturb the calm surface of their lives. Except the mother keeps getting tired. And then, in the midst of the relentlessly ordinary, is a phone call from the hospital, where the daughter uses impersonation to get the information she correctly thinks she’s being shielded from.

Then the telephone rings, it’s the nurse, she’s Swedish or Norwegian. She speaks clearly but considerately. She reads aloud from the patient file. The patient expresses great surprise at the severity of her illness. Her mother bounds into the living room with two potatoes. She finds a telephone conversation taking place and beats a quiet retreat. Now the music changes, again her mother sings along. The doctors can relieve the symptoms, but the condition can’t be cured. Her school bag is dumped on the floor, she sits in front of it with her back to the rest of the room. Six months, perhaps a year. The dinner’s ready, they can eat now. They eat now.

A rock has been thrown into that pool – but not into the narrative. Helle’s prose continues as slowly, calmly as before. The mother has to stay in hospital, and the girl distracts herself with baking and housework. This is not a novel with heart-to-hearts or emotional outbursts. It is quiet and tender.

I’ll be honest. For the first 50 pages or so, I wasn’t sure about They. To be frank, I found it boring. The voice didn’t feel quite as distinctive as I’d hoped – but which I mean that it didn’t have the oddness or off-kilter elements that might make Helle’s prose stand out. But, as I kept reading, and as the prose washed over me, I succumbed. I got into the rhythm of the writing, and started to understand what made it special. Ultimately, They won me over. It took a bit of time for me to connect with it, but once I had, I appreciated the gentleness, everydayness of it.

It was also one where I wish I could compare the translation with the original. There were some moments where the English didn’t quite make sense – a ‘goes’ that should have been ‘went’; a ‘since’ which should have been ‘in case’ – but I assume these discordances were in the original? Maybe?

Apparently it is the first of a trilogy, with the other two books focusing on one of this novel’s background characters. I can see myself going back another time, and hoping for that same connection to appear, once I let the novel take me over.

Aftermath: On Marriage and Separation by Rachel Cusk – #ABookADayInMay – Day 22

I know Rachel Cusk is revered by many, but I have to confess my only attempt with her fiction was a mixed blessing. I thought the writing was stunning, and the book had no momentum at all. I don’t normally mind the absence of plot, but Outline tested my limits. And yet, I wanted to try her again – and today I did, with Aftermath: On Marriage and Separation (2012). I thought I might have more luck with her non-fiction.

The topic of Aftermath is, as the subtitle suggests, her marriage to the photographer Adrian Clarke, though he is unnamed in the book. It is a concession to privacy that is seldom paid much attention in the disconcertingly honest book – while some characters, including her daughter’s friends, are represented by an initial, it would be hard not to identify them if you knew them. Remorseless, relentless honesty is the order of the day.

Cusk uses the fire of their separation as the jumping-off point for a discussion of many different things – starting with a look at gender roles in marriage, and what feminism is or is not. Like many women, she found that the division of labour in the home was extremely unequal.

My notion of half was more like the earthworm’s: you cut it in two, but each half remains an earthworm, wriggling and fending for itself. I earned the money in our household, did my share of the cooking and cleaning, paid someone to look after the children while I worked, picking them up from school once they were older. And my husband helped. It was his phrase, and still is: he helped me. I was the compartmentalised modern woman, the woman having it all, and he helped me to be it, to have it. But I didn’t want help: I wanted equality. In fact, this idea of help began to annoy me. Why couldn’t we be the same? Why couldn’t he be compartmentalised, too? And why, exactly, was it helpful for a man to look after his own children, or cook the food that he himself would eat? Helpful is what a good child is to its mother. A helpful person is someone who performs duties outside their own sphere of responsibility, out of the kindness of their heart. Help is dangerous because it exists outside the human economy: the only payment for help is gratitude. And did I not have something of the same gratuitous tone where my wage-earning was concerned? Did I not think there was something awfully helpful about me, a woman, supporting my own family?

It is a battle cry heard over and over again by anybody dissecting the ways in which gender norms create inequality in marriage. Cusk describes it well, and perhaps it was more novel a cry in 2012, though it will not surprise anybody any more. Not that things have changed since 2012, I suspect. It’s just that the reader is more likely to nod their head and roll their eyes than think that Cusk has uncovered something shocking and new. The opening is quite abstract. And because it is retreading now-familiar ground, it didn’t have the impact it could have done if she were a bit sharper with specifics.

Thankfully, she does exactly that in the next section – what a wonderfully specific detail this is:

The day my husband moved his possessions out of our house I had toothache. It was raining, and all morning the door to the street stood open. The wet air gusted in and the dim hall lay like an opened tomb in the grey daylight. I stood at the bottom of the stairs, my hands over my mouth, like a mime artist pantomiming dismay.

She is on far surer ground when relating actual events than she is when trying to philosophise about them in the abstract. The strongest, most memorable parts of Aftermath, in my opinion, were these sharp moments – for example, a story about renting terrible accommodation while her children went horse-riding, or the awkward experience of a lodger moving into the spare room after her husband’s departure, or the extraction of the aforementioned tooth. Cusk is seldom generous in her descriptions of anyone, including herself, and she is vicious in her physical depictions of even the most casual background ‘character’. Make of that what you will.

Along the way, Cusk broadens out from her own experiences to seek parallels in a shared cultural history. There is a lot drawn from Greek mythology, though my knowledge of Clytemnestra et al is very shaky – I’m grateful for Cusk including the details we need to know to make the comparison (though if her understanding of them is as weak as her understanding of the Bible, then I have some doubts if I’m actually any the wiser).

Still, the best parts of the book – which I enjoyed reading a lot, despite some misgivings – were those parts where she put aside the abstract and went for the concrete. The irony of the book is that there is very little that is precise about her marriage or separation – and far more drawn from later events, or events with other people. As the book progresses, she turns her attention to ‘X’, ‘Y’, and ‘Z’, three people with whom she forms some sort of connection. Y, for example, is some sort of counsellor.

It is strange to discuss my marriage in this room; its neutrality is almost chastising, makes the story both more lurid and more sombre, like the orderly courtrooms in which suited committees analyse war crimes, carefully dissect individual acts of thoughtless brutality and havoc over matching coffee cups. It is aftermath, the thing that happens once reality has occurred.

Throughout, Cusk’s writing is exceptionally good. It was only when I finished it that I realised – despite the tone and feel of total honesty – that I didn’t really know anything at all about her marriage or her separation. You never get a sense of what drew Cusk to Clarke, or any of his positive qualities (presuming he has them). You don’t even get a sense of his particular negative ones, besides an unenlightened approach to marital roles, which is admittedly a significant one. Perhaps the most revealing description of their marriage really comes in a curious short story that concludes the book, which has a moment of revelation that made me gasp.

It’s odd for a work of memoir to feel so blisteringly open, often in ways that it would be hard to advise, while also being something of a closed book. And despite not really being the book I expected, I’d still recommend it. I’m not sure it’s the book Cusk thinks it is, or that I imagined I’d be reading, but it’s a very good one nonetheless.

The Driveway Has Two Sides by Sara Marchant – #ABookADayInMay – Day 20

I’m continuing my reading of Fairlight Moderns with The Driveway Has Two Sides (2018) by Sara Marchant – with another lovely cover illustration by Sam Kalda. Honestly, I can’t speak highly enough of these editions. Their size and feel and the care taken over them are all wonderful.

And thankfully, in this case, the book is also excellent! I really enjoyed The Driveway Has Two Sides, and it has made me interested to read more by Marchant.

It’s set on an East Coast Island, onto which moves Delilah. She is a young woman who is, we are told quite often, beautiful and sexy (if the book were written by a man, I’d have questioned how often we needed to know that!) On the small island, any outsider is treated with a little suspicion – and she clearly doesn’t want to be at the heart of the community. But she shares her driveway with the yellow house next door, and the resident there is even less keen to communicate. They can be recluses near each other.

If you looked underneath you noticed certain signs that all was not as it should be. The man next door hardly ever went out and no visitors ever went in. When he did go, it was in his own car that he kept in the garage at the front of the shared drive, and he left the island on the ferry. He made no overtures of neighborliness to the girl, and to the villagers’ eyes she seemed either uninterested or maybe not even aware of his existence. This was odd because they shared a driveway.

But then Delilah gets to know the local sheriff, Ted. He is a widow, and I particularly enjoyed the detail that local women brought him meals a lot… until he saw Delilah for the third time, and the overtures and offerings ceased. All small communities are the same! Ted’s kindness starts to wear Delilah down a little… leaving her with three men to decide between. Ted, the mysterious man next door, and the married boyfriend who is paying for her home.

That makes The Driveway Has Two Sides sound like a romcom, and it probably doesn’t help that the Amazon subheading is ‘the perfect escapist beach read’. Because this novella is so much more interesting than a ‘who will she choose?’ plot (though I have to admit that Ted is one of the lovelier characters I’ve come across in a while). I found it much more a calming, beautiful look at someone trying to forge a home – and being gradually brought into contact with other people. Delilah is particularly interested in gardening, and over the course of the short book she manages to breath life into the gardens at the front and back of the house – causing gossip among the locals, and also inadvertently opening up a connection with her neighbour.

There are a few bigger ‘plotty’ moments, including a twist or two, and they did feel a bit like they belonged to a different, longer novel. The Driveway Has Two Sides was on firmer ground when it was about the subtle, poignant shifts in relationships between two people that happen almost reluctantly. I found it a beautiful, absorbing little book, creating a community I felt I knew well. Whether or not it had the ending I was hoping for is another question, but the fact I was invested in the outcome is a strong endorsement…

Fight by Preston Sprinkle – #ABookADayInMay – Day 15

This is barely a blog post – just noting that, on an evening journey to visit a friend in Milton Keynes, I finished my audiobook of the moment: Fight: A Christian Case for Non-Violence (2014) by Preston Sprinkle.

Preston Sprinkle is my favourite Christian writer (theologian? I don’t know where the line is to become one) and I love his books on a wide range of topics – he also hosts an excellent and wide-ranging podcast called Theology in the Raw (so I guess he is a theologian). His books range from the very accessible to the quite academic, sometimes within the same chapter, and Fight is to the accessible side of things. I think the print version has a lot of supporting academic material in appendices.

Sprinkle’s thesis is basically that Christians are called to be non-violent – which I think is a more controversial claim in parts of right-wing America than it is here. And, as often with Sprinkle, it’s not a conclusion he comes to instinctively or even comfortably. He always looks to find his theology from the Bible, not from culture or history or assumption. He goes even further than most, and argues that Christians shouldn’t fight in the army, shouldn’t kill someone trying to attack them etc, and has beautiful, Christ-centred back-up.

I’ll be honest, this is perhaps the worst kind of theological reading – in that I’m reading something I know I’ll agree with. I’m instinctively a pacifist and find violence abhorrent in any form. So I’m glad to have scriptural back-up for it (though it also seems very self-evident of the Prince of Peace) – particularly for the trickier bits of the Old Testament or Revelation that people will wheel out in opposition to the idea, often without having actually read them.

So, when I say ‘worst kind’, I mean this book has not challenged my thinking at all – because it says what I want it to. And I know that’s kinda lazy… but also I’ll follow Preston Sprinkle anywhere he leads.

Whereabouts by Jhumpa Lahiri – #ABookADayInMay – Day 9

I absolutely loved the short story collection The Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri, and naturally was keen to try more by her. It’s taken a while, but today I read Whereabouts – first published in Italian in 2018, and translated by the author in 2021. I don’t think I’ve ever read a novel translated by its author before, and it all adds to Lahiri’s exceptional talent.

This novel – as so often in May, I am tempted to add ‘novella?’ as a qualifier – is about an unnamed woman in her mid-40s walking through a city. That is almost the whole plot. The story describes many different days, rather than one, but it is like an eternal moment – whether passing a shop that used to house her favourite stationery store, visiting her grieving mother, or struggling to leave the hosue, we are in a sort of everyday always. There is a sense that her life is unchanging, but she is not trapped, exactly. She is too caught up in observing everything and everyone. It’s one of several ways the book reminded me of On the Calculation of Volume by Solvej Balle. They share the same gentle rhythm, and the same peaceful interaction of a woman with surroundings that she is somehow both subsumed by and separate from. As Ali wrote in her perceptive review, she experiences belonging and isolation simultaneously.

Solitude: it’s become my trade. As it requires a certain discipline, it’s a condition I try to perfect. And yet it plagues me, it weighs on me in spite of my knowing it so well. It’s probably my mother’s influence. She’s always been afraid of being alone and now her life as an old woman torments her, so much that when I call to ask how she’s doing, she just says, I’m very alone. She says she misses having amusing and surprising experiences, this even though she has lots of friends who love her, and a social life far more complicated and lively than mine. The last time I went to visit her, for example, the phone kept ringing. And yet she’s always on edge. I’m not sure why. She’s burdened by the passage of time.

We don’t learn much about the woman’s mother, except for a handful of her stronger emotions and the way she impacts her daughter’s life. But, to be honest, we don’t learn that much about the central character. This didn’t feel like a character portrait, to me – rather, it is a portrait of an experience. Of a city, but really of experiencing a city. Along the way there are snapshots – a daughter refusing to stay the night with her single father; friends rummaging through luggage in the shop that used to sell stationery; an argument at a dinner party. They are brushstrokes coming together to create a single image.

I very much enjoyed reading Whereabouts because it is beautiful, poetic, dreamy. It felt quite different from Interpreter of Maladies, which had sharp details and a depth of insight into the relationship between pairs of people. This was much more impressionistic. Both are done very well – I probably prefer Interpreter of Maladies and the sharp style she has there, but it really depends what you’re in the mood for. Being able t

The Dutch House by Ann Patchett

Sometimes, reading a book that everyone was reading a few years ago can make you feel more behind the times than reading something from a century ago. I knew about The Dutch House (2019) by Ann Patchett, of course, since it won any number of awards and appeared in lots of best-of lists – but I didn’t really know any details, and for some reason it hadn’t appealed. Thank goodness for book group selecting it. Now that I’ve read it, I can certainly see what all the fuss is about.

The first time our father brought Andrea to the Dutch House, Sandy, our housekeeper, came to my sister’s room and told us to come downstairs. “Your father has a friend he wants you to meet,” she said.

“Is it a work friend?” Maeve asked. She was older and so had a more complex understanding of friendship.

Sandy considered the question. “I’d say not. Where’s your brother?”

That’s how The Dutch House opens, and it is our introduction to the family unit living in the house in question. The narrator is Danny, Maeve’s brother, and he is hiding behind the drapes, eavesdropping. The house itself is hard to grasp. I’ve often mentioned that I don’t have a ‘mind’s eye’ for picturing visual descriptions, so I always struggle with that sort of thing, but I struggled here to even have a sense of its size. There are a handful of small bedrooms – but a ballroom on the third floor. It was built for a Dutch family with ornate mouldings and lavish features, but is clearly quite modern and on a street soon crowded with other buildings and a short driveway. I suppose almost all neighbourhoods in America are modern to British eyes.

To go back to that opening, Andrea will eventually be their new stepmother – an unwelcome addition to the household, who seems to make no effort with her boyfriend’s children and see them as an affront on her new position and home. She is young and beautiful, and perhaps that is why Danny and Maeve’s father has chosen to marry her. Danny, the narrator is looking back from several decades in the future, merging his eight-year-old experience with the understanding of a middle-aged man, but in neither iteration is he particularly good at recognising the motivations of others. It often doesn’t seem to cross his mind. Their mother has disappeared – Danny can scarcely remember her – and none of their questions about her whereabouts are satisfactorily answered. They assume she is dead, but if she is alive then her deliberate absence is a kind of death to them.

Much of the first section of the novel is about the unspoken war between Andrea and Danny/Maeve. It is only after two years of Andrea being a regular visitor to the house that they discover she has two daughters of her own, younger than they are.

Nearly two years into her irregular tenure, Andrea walked in the house one Saturday afternoon with two small girls. Say what you will for Andrea, she had a knack for making the impossible seem natural. I wasn’t clear about whether it was only Maeve and I who were meeting her daughters for the first time, or if the existence of Norma and Bright Smith was news to our father as well. No, he must have known. The very fact that he didn’t look at them meant they were already familiar.

This passage is an excellent example of what Patchett is doing so cleverly throughout the novel. As well as some incisive turns of phrase – ‘a knack for making the impossible seem natural’ – it shows how she interweaves Danny’s different perspectives across time. At the forefront is the 10-year-old who thinks his father might not have known about his potential stepdaughters – followed by the older man realising how absurd this remembered confusion is – then followed, again, with a striking memory that supports his more recent understanding of the situation. Patchett is a subtle, sharp writer, and it is extraordinary how she manages to keep the sensibilities of young and old on the page at the same time. All tied together with Danny’s lack of self-awareness. We gradually realise, as the novel continues, how little he truly understands of almost anybody else in his life – regardless of whether he cherishes them or despises them. His flaws are so unspoken that it takes a while – it took me a while, at least – to recognise that is an unreliable narrator. Not because he lies, but because there is so much he doesn’t know, often without realising. (Incidentally, it felt like such a female voice – particularly in the opening chapters, where I had to keep reminding myself that it was a brother, not a sister, narrating. I don’t know why I kept thinking it was a girl speaking, but others at book group agreed.)

I started the novel thinking that it was fine – relatively well-written, ordinary enough. Somewhere along the way I was totally beguiled. Without noticing quite when, I was immersed and filled with admiration. This is the real deal.

Through Danny’s eyes, we see him and his sister grow older. Maeve is away at college – during which, Andrea moves her things into the attic bedroom. Losing her beloved windowseat, and doing so uncomplainingly, is one of the great wounding moments of literature. It reminded me of Jo March’s stories being burned, though Maeve’s response is certainly much more subdued.

Alongside this, Danny is figuring out his future. His father is a property tycoon, buying and selling commercial and residential buildings, and this is the world that Danny longs to join. Maeve clearly has a brilliance with figures, but it is not expected that she shall do significant further education or join the family business. I never worked out the timeline of the novel, but we must be somewhere around the mid-century, or a bit later.

I don’t want to spoil any further events in the novel, but it covers decades of the brother’s and sister’s lives. Tragedy and the selfish behaviour of others shapes the direction of their lives – but their own pettiness and hubris play their parts too. Danny’s marriage and children are a significant part of the latter stages of The Dutch House, but there is one true romance at the heart of the book. ‘Romance’ is probably the wrong word, but I mean it in a sexless way: Maeve is always the focus of Danny’s attention and care. She is the most interesting character in the novel because she is the most interesting character in Danny’s life. He never states it outright, but her wisdom, kindness, and determination are sacred to him.

Which is not to say they never argue. Arguing is their main form of communication. Patchett writes an adult sibling relationship so well in The Dutch House – the sort of relationship that is central to many people’s lives, but seldom addressed in fiction. There is a depth of dependence and trust between them, and a bond that cannot be equalled in any other relationship. It is beautiful, even when it is frustrating and occasionally unhealthy. She captures the sibling dynamic so perfectly in their quippy dialogue, which darts between openness and occasional secrecy. The depth of their care for each other means that some things are kept hidden, for the perceived benefit of the other. And, again, we gradually realise that there is a lot about Maeve that Danny has never truly understood.

I kept thinking that Maeve would be a better title for the novel. She is the narrator’s first and last consideration, even his obsession. She has played sister, father, mother, friend, mentor, and even the cover is a specially commissioned portrait that appears in the novel. But calling it The Dutch House is clever: it keeps the home in our thoughts, even when the narrative moves far from it. It gives the reader an expectancy that the house will return. The legacy of their upbringing is this strange, almost fantastical, home casts a long shadow over their lives. And for reasons they never fully understand, in their 20s and 30s they often return to the house – not to go inside, but to sit in a car outside, smoking and talking.

“This isn’t a stakeout. It’s not like we’re here all the time. We drop by every couple of months for fifteen minutes.”

“It’s more than fifteen minutes,” I said, and it might well have been more than every couple of months.

There is a sharp line later in the book, where Danny realises he is nostalgic not for their childhood, but for the times in the car outside their childhood home. Not for memory, but for memory of memory – filtered through his sister and their conversations.

There is so much in The Dutch House. Whole careers, marriages, twists that wouldn’t be out of place in a murder mystery, but which are played with an almost subdued thoughtfulness. Patchett reminded me of Barbara Kingsolver, or perhaps Carol Shields. Writers who are not reinventing the novel form or taking it into new, shocking directions – but are taking a traditional novel, focusing on characters and their development, and simply doing it with exceptional skill. She elevates the genre. That is Patchett’s real brilliance: to make her creations live so vitally and vividly that it feels important to witness their world.

I hope this doesn’t sound over the top, but few novels convey so successfully how monumental it is simply to live a life.

The Reading Promise by Alice Ozma

Every now and then, I’ll know it’s time to pick a book from my teetering pile of books about reading. I mean this literally, except there is not one pile: there are three. They stand about three feet tall, behind the door into my living room, as there simply isn’t space for them anywhere else – and they are not in any order, so that read and unread books, old and new, a scattergun of unalphabetised authors sit there.

The most recent choice was The Reading Promise (2011) by Alice Ozma, which my friend Malie gave me for my birthday last year. The subtitle tells you what is going on: ‘3,218 nights of reading with my father’.

Opinions differ, within the book, about how the promise started. But it seems to have started on a train. Alice’s dad – Jim – regularly read to Alice at night and now, in 1998, when Alice was in third grade (the internet tells me this is aged eight or nine) they decided to make this casual habit into something official. They started The Streak. Now, their opinions differ on whether they initially set out to do a hundred days or a thousand – one remembers the hundred-day streak ending with a commitment to add another 900 days, while the other thinks it was a thousand at the outset – but the commitment was made.

When I started reading Ozma’s book, I thought it might feature a lot of the books they discussed. And they are in there, of course. But the specifics are somewhat incidental to what is really a memoir of a father/daughter relationship – one that became all the more important after Ozma’s parents divorced. Their shared love of reading managed to get past the awkward teenage period, and they were able to put aside temporary feuds to ensure they had at least a few minutes of reading every night – though Ozma movingly remembers the final time that she lay in the crook of her dad’s arm as he read. And even that was an unusual concession to the significance of the nightly ritual: Ozma builds up a picture of a kind, intelligent, funny and very loving man, but he is not the warm, huggy man you might be picturing from the premise.

My dad is not an affectionate man. As a librarian, he told his students not to touch him, warning them that his skin was poisonous. Kindergarteners seemed to accept this as fact, but the older students often wondered why they couldn’t just give their favourite teacher a hug. He does not like to be touched, and he does not want to touch other people. After school concerts or award ceremonies, I saw other parents hug and sometimes even kiss their children. My father considered it a bold and almost over-the-top display to stick one finger in my hair and scrtach my scalp for a moment with his cracked fingernail, like he was helping me get an itch I just couldn’t reach. If the event called for such a grand gesture, he would do it quickly and then back away several feet. 

The portrait of Jim is necessarily very subjective, and I wasn’t always sure that I would like him were I to meet him, but I loved reading the evolving relationship of father and daughter (with other members of the family much more peripheral). Reading is more of a thread through the tapestry than the main content – there is, for instance, no complete list of books read, just some pages of the ones they remember, ranging from childhood classics to presidential biographies, via Dickens, Shakespeare, Arthur Conan Doyle, and many, many books I haven’t heard of.

And because the reading is really a portal to their relationship, there are lots of chapters about totally unrelated things. There is a clarion call against the American education system for its devaluing of reading. There are the various relationships her father has after divorce, and what an extending, evolving family feels like. The most fascinating tangent is where Ozma writes about her vivid fear of JFK. Even when she learns he is dead, the fear doesn’t abate: she is terrified that his body (still, somehow, evil and out to get her) is in her bedroom. Holding a book he once loved leaves her scrubbing her hands like Lady Macbeth. The terror is so unusual that a novelist might be wary of using it, but Ozma describes it with a heady recollection of the fear, as well as self-awareness about how unrelatable it is, at least as a specific phobia. It’s not what I expected in a memoir about reading, but these sorts of details and anecdotes help set The Reading Promise apart from any book-about-books that ends up retreading familiar ground.

Why did The Streak end? There isn’t a sad story here: it simply ended because Ozma went away to college. And this book is really a tribute to what a beautiful thing it was. An obsessive, perhaps peculiar version of many father/daughter relationships – but lovely to read a memoir of resilient love, and a generational love of reading that persisted long beyond the close of the book. Here are the final words of The Reading Promise (which, in case it isn’t clear, is a book I loved reading):

We called it The Reading Streak, but it was really more of a promise. A promise to each other, a promise to ourselves. A promise to always be there and to never give up. It was a promise of hope in hopeless times. It was a promise of comfort when things got uncomfortable. And we kept our promise to each other.

But more than that, it was a promise to the world: a promise to remember the power of the printed word, to take time to cherish it, to protect it at all costs. He promised to explain, to anyone and everyone he meets, the life-changing ability literature can have. He promised to fight for it. So that’s what he’s doing.

Thirteen years ago, my father made the reading promise to me. He kept his word.

A couple of underwhelming #ABookADayInMay choices – Days 28 + 29

Coming towards the end of A Book A Day In May, I’ve read a couple of books that weren’t particularly bad, but left me pretty underwhelmed. So let’s race through them.

One Writer's Beginnings: Amazon.co.uk: Welty, Eudora: 9781982152109: Books

One Writer’s Beginnings (1984) by Eudora Welty

I’ve only read two of Eudora Welty’s novels – The Optimist’s Daughter, which I thought was brilliant, and Delta Wedding, which I didn’t. Years and years ago I started One Writer’s Beginnings but somehow never finished it – and, considering it’s 102 pages, I should have taken that as a red flag. Well, I started again and now I’ve read it, but it felt very meh.

One Writer’s Beginnings comes from three lectures that Welty gave at Harvard, and I wonder what they made of them there. Really, this is my fault though. I always find the childhood sections of autobiographies the least interesting sections – and One Writer’s Beginnings told me in the title that that’s what it would be. Welty’s three chapters are basically childhood anecdotes and family folklore, and only right at the end do we get anything hinting at her writing career (beyond the odd mention here and there, which presumably reminded Harvard that they’d invited her as a Pulitzer prizewinning author, rather than someone with a diverting childhood).

There’s nothing wrong with her stories, and some of the things her family experienced were heartrending (there is a poignant section where she accidentally learns about the brother who died, and even more poignant that she adds that her parents never mentioned him again). But I found that her novelist’s craft rather deserted her. Even anecdotes that should be interesting in fundamentals come across as curiously uninteresting. I recognise that I’ve not detailed what many of them are, and that’s because I’ve already forgotten almost all of them. I don’t know why One Writer’s Beginnings was so bland to me, but it was. Your mileage may vary.

undefined

Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda (2015) by Becky Albertalli

I listened to this young adult novel, having previously watched the film – adaptated under the more crowdpleasing title Love, Simon. It’s about a gay teenager (Simon) who has been emailing another gay teenager – both of them using pseudonyms. The novel is about this e-friendship, wondering who ‘Blue’ might be, and the wider group of Simon’s friends and family.

I’d enjoyed the film, but found the book a bit slow by comparison. I didn’t much care about any of Simon’s friends, and the subplots involving them were a bit of a slog. The book picked up towards the end – and, thank you fading memory, I had misremembered the identity of ‘Blue’ – so that revelation came as a surprise the second time around. I guess either I’m too old for this sort of book, or the makers of the film turned it into something a bit zippier. (As a sidenote, and I’ve found this a few times, listening to an audiobook with lots of emails in it is a mistake, cos you can skim over the email address / time stamp / subject line when you’re reading it, and it is tedious to hear all these read out over and over again in an audiobook.)

So, not the best couple of days, so let’s be optimistic for finishing off May well with my next two choices.

The Odd Woman and the City by Vivian Gornick – #ABookADayInMay Day 7

I’m only buying 24 books this year, and so naturally I’m choosing them carefully. I knew I had to have The Odd Woman and the City (2015) by Vivian Gornick when Jacqui wrote a brilliant review in January (and it certainly didn’t hurt that it had been republished by Daunt Books, who have impeccable taste). Now I’ve read it, and Jacqui didn’t put me wrong – it’s brilliant.

The Odd Woman and the City has the subtitle ‘a memoir’, but it’s only a memoir in the loose sense that it’s non-fiction and in the first person. Don’t come here expecting to have anything you might traditionally expect in a memoir. Anything we learn about Gornick is picked up almost by accident, in amidst the things that she thinks are more important – or perhaps I should say, she recognises that things like friendship, city life, and literary appreciation are more significant markers of a person’s life than date of birth, list of publications etc. etc.

The Odd Woman and the City isn’t told in fragments in the way that Blue Postcards was – it feels more linear than that – but it is still built up impressionistically, weaving between reflections on friendship with a man she loves but brings out her negative side, to comments overheard as she walks through New York, to analyses of books she has loved from Middlemarch to Isabel Bolton to George Gissing’s The Odd Women that inspires Gornick’s title. Her main subjects are right there in the title: herself, and New York.

I have always lived in New York, but a good part of my life I longed for the city the way someone in a small town would, yearning to ­arrive at the capital. Growing up in the Bronx was like growing up in a village. From earliest adolescence I knew there was a center of the world and that I was far from it. At the same time, I also knew it was only a subway ride away, downtown in Manhattan. Manhattan was Araby. 

At fourteen I began taking that subway ride, walking the length and breadth of the island late in winter, deep in summer. The only difference between me and someone like me from Kansas was that in Kansas one makes the immigrant’s lonely leap once and forever, whereas I made many small trips into the city, going home repeatedly for comfort and reassurance, dullness and delay, before attempting the main chance. Down Broadway, up Lexington, across Fifty-Seventh Street, from river to river, through Greenwich Village, Chelsea, the Lower East Side, plunging down to Wall Street, climbing up to Columbia. I walked these streets for years, excited and expectant, going home each night to the Bronx, where I waited for life to begin.

I have never been to New York, and I don’t particularly want to. I am emphatically not a city person and I never intend to live in one again (my 13 years in a city as small as Oxford were proof that I wasn’t built for city living). Gornick even commits the cardinal sin of saying that the Bronx is ‘like a village’, which is the sort of thing people say about areas of cities if they have never lived in a village. And yet I loved reading about Gornick’s thoughts on city life – the people she knows, the people she overlaps with, the communities that have battled through modernity and the ones that have been lost. She scatters in amusing or unusual New York moments in between longer self-examinations, as though she is walking through the city, lost in contemplation, and occasionally interrupted by something significant in front of her.

On upper Broadway a beggar approaches a middle-aged woman. ‘I don’t drink, I don’t do drugs, I just need –’ he starts. To his amazement, the woman yells directly into his face, ‘I just had my pocket picked!’ The beggar turns his face northward and calls to a colleague up the block, ‘Hey, Bobby, leave her alone, she just got robbed.’

She is excellent at immersing us in different worlds, whether that is particular streets or particular milieus. Some are more sustained – towards the end of the book there is a poignant recollection of seeing a friend delivering a Samuel Beckett monologue after having been severely invalided by a stroke. Some are only in passing, but Gornick is brilliant are using all of the elements to build up a picture of her life. Her sense of rhythm and pace – whether of sentences, paragraphs, or whole sections – is exhilirating.

She is remorseless is self-examination – though I did enjoy the contradiction of nearby sentences that ‘It is the great illusion of our culture that what we confess to is who we are’ and ‘No one is more surprised than me that I turned out to be who I am’. What an irony – to create a memoir while saying that she does not understand herself, and that you shouldn’t believe her even if she said she did. But somehow both those statements get to the heart of what The Odd Woman and the City is: more an exploration of the questions you could ask about your life, your friendships, your connections, your city, your home – and less about any concrete conclusions. Gornick resists writing the traditional, solid memoir on firm foundations, and the result is excellent. The book is somehow sturdy in its fluidity.

In conclusion, Jacqui was right, of course. This book is a marvel.