This is a rather lovely little song called ‘Concrete Wall’ by Zee Avi. Innovative ‘percussion’!
All
Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany
Happy weekend y’all! Hope everyone is very well. I spent my Friday evening watching a great 1945 film I Live in Grosvenor Square with Rex Harrison and Anna Neagle – and, the reason I watched it, Dame Irene Vanbrugh! It was the inaugural film in Andrea & Simon’s Film Club (basically a fancy name for my friend Andrea and I taking it in turns to choose films) – I’ll keep you posted if we watch anything really great. And maybe I’ll do a proper post on I Live in Grosvenor Square one day.
1.) The book – could have your name in it! A youtuber I was watching mention U*Novels (‘you star novels’) which allows you to have specially printed editions of classic novels where you choose the names of the cast. This could make a really fun gift. Want to put your husband in as Mr. Darcy? Fancy taking a trip to Wonderland and having your friends appear as the caterpillar or Chesire Cat? It sounds silly and fun to me.
2.) The blog post – Melwyk over at The Indextrious Reader has started up a really interesting Postal Reading Challenge – reading books with postal themes (e.g. collections of letters – those of you who got excited about Maxwell/Welty or Maxwell/Warner collections could jump on board!) Head over here to find out more.
3.) The link – I just wanted to remind you to WATCH THE LIZZIE BENNET DIARIES if you’re not already. (A re-telling of Pride and Prejudice through vlogs – I first wrote about here.) It’s got so good recently – and Lydia Bennet’s channel is also brilliant. Mary Kate Wiles (along with the writers) has really fleshed out Lydia to be a very sympathetic, thorough character, rather than the silly, flighty girl that Lizzie sees (and thus that we see in the novel.) Lydia’s channel is here, and Lizzie’s is here. There are quite a lot of videos to watch, but I’ll make it easy for you to start – here is ep.1 of Lizzie’s channel.
What There Is To Say We Have Said: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty & William Maxwell
The third Reading Presently book was a really lovely surprise gift from Heather, who reads my blog (but doesn’t, I’m pretty sure, have one herself.) She saw how much I’d loved the letters of William Maxwell and Sylvia Townsend Warner, and decided (quite rightly) that I should also have the opportunity to read William Maxwell’s letters to another doyenne of the printed word – Eudora Welty.
Although no collection of letters is likely to compare to The Element of Lavishness in my mind, this is still a really wonderful book. The dynamics are a little different – both are on the same side of the Atlantic (Maxwell can write to Welty ‘And warm though the British are, one needs to have them explained to one, and everything is through the looking glass’) ; both go more or less through the same stages of their careers – with Warner, Maxwell was always the young enthusiast, even when he was essentially her boss. Here is more a meeting of equals, sharing some literary friends (especially Elizabeth Bowen) and loving and respecting each other without the need to impress (which brought out the very finest of Maxwell’s writing, to Warner.)
It was a delight to ‘meet’ Maxwell’s wife and children again, and to see the girls grow up once more – and fascinating to see how this is framed a little differently in the different books. For her part, Welty’s relationship with her homeland (Jackson, Mississippi) is really interesting – a definitely conflicted relationship, cross with the attitudes of her neighbourhood, but loving home. It’s pretty rare that ‘place’ makes an impact on me, let alone somebody’s engagement with their individual city, but this was certainly one of those occasions.
Just as Warner’s letters stood out more for me in The Element of Lavishness, it was Maxwell’s turn to take the foreground in What There Is To Say We Have Said (which is a lovely title, incidentally – a quotation from the penultimate letter Maxwell sent.) So I jotted down a few Maxwell excerpts, but nothing from Welty – who, though wonderful, turned out to be less quoteworthy. I love this from Maxwell, about wishing for a Virginia Woolf audiobook:
What wouldn’t you give for a recording of her reading “To the Lighthouse,” on one side and “The Waves” on the other. It’s enough to unsettle my reason, just having imagined it. I’ll try not think about it any more.
I mostly love how impassioned (and funny) he is – and I’m probably going to be peppering my conversation with ‘it’s enough to unsettle my reason’. It rivals that immortal line from the TV adaptation of Cranford: “Put not another dainty to your lips, for you will choke when you hear what I have to say!” (Note to Self: I must watch Cranford again…)
Maxwell is, of course, a great novelist on his own account – but I think one of his most significant contributions to literature is his panache as an appreciator. Even when he was turning down Warner’s stories for the New Yorker, he managed to do so with admiration dripping from every penstroke of the rejection. He so perfectly (and honestly) identifies what the author was hoping would be praised, and describes the raptures of an avid reader. Here is his beautiful response to Eudora Welty’s The Golden Apples:
At one point I was aware that I was holding my breath, a thing I don’t ever remember doing before, while reading, and what I was holding my breath for is lest I might disturb something in nature, a leaf that was about to move, a bird, a wasp, a blade of grass caught between other blades of grass and about to set itself free. And then farther on I said to myself, this writing is corrective, meaning of course for myself and all other writers, and almost at the end I said reverently This is how one feels in the presence of a work of art, and finally, in the last paragraph, when the face came through, there was nothing to say. You had gone as far as there is to go and then taken one step further.
Which author would not thrill to this letter? Can a better response be imagined? There is never any sense, in his praise to Welty or Warner, that he is exaggerating or being sycophantic – he simply expresses the joy he feels, unabashed, and the women he writes to are sensible enough to accept his praise without undue modesty. Welty returns compliments on Maxwell’s writing more than Warner ever did – c.f. again the youthful admirer / fond sage dynamic which was going on there.
If this collection does not match up to The Element of Lavishness, it is because it does not have the magic of Warner’s letter writing. But to criticise it for that would be like criticising chocolate cake because it wasn’t double chocolate cake. This is a wonderful, decades-long account of a friendship between literary greats – and is equally marvellous for both the literary interest and the testament (if I may) of friendship. Thank you, Heather, I’m so grateful for this joy of a book it, and they, will stay with me for a while. Now, did William Maxwell write to anyone else…
The Sea, The Sea, THE BLINKING SEA.
This innocent little picture from the back of my diary reveals so little of the anguish and torment which it represents…
When someone suggested The Sea, The Sea for my book group last September, my initial thought was “Oh, good. I wasn’t sure whether or not I liked The Sandcastle, and now I’ll be able to have another try with Iris Murdoch.”
And then I saw how long it was.
Well, nothing daunted (ok, a little bit daunted), I started to read it. And it’s really beautifully written. It all starts off with a retired theatre director in his new house by the sea, discussing his hectic past and his embrace of solitude. And his meals. Always his meals.
(This, incidentally, will not be a review of the book. I don’t have the stamina.)
My experience – nay, my journey – with The Sea, The Sea was very strange. I started off thinking I’d cracked Murdoch. All those unread novels by her, sitting on my shelf, could now be read.
And then…
Well, that beautiful prose got rather cloying after a while. There is almost no dialogue, because Charles Arrowby lives alone. Even at the best of times, I prefer well-written dialogue to well-written narrative – one of the reasons I love Ivy Compton-Burnett so much – and I felt rather beleaguered by it all after a while.
And then…
Then it got mad. By a series of bizarre coincidences, every woman Charles has ever romanced ends up in the same village – including the love of his youth, now a dowdy old woman. He is still bewitched by her, or the memory of her, and is determined to ‘free’ her from her cruel husband. She admits that he has been cruel… and changes her mind a bit about it… so Charles (great sage that he is) decides the best thing to do is kidnap her, hold her against her will in a locked bedroom, and tell her how much she loves him. He wants to free her, by imprisoning her.
Ok, so Charles is insane. But nobody else much seems to mind. The husband busies himself with gardening, various other people have highly-detailed lunches and bathe in the sea. There’s even a half-hearted murder plot thrown in for good measure.
Most bizarre of all, once the woman is finally let out of her locked room (Charles still determined that they love one another), she goes back home and nobody seems to mind either. She even lets him come to tea. IT ALL MAKES NO SENSE.
I finished reading it. I was hoping there would be some big pay-off. It’s a first-person narrative, so I was expecting a big unreliable-narrator twist – did any of it happen? Is Charles insane? But, instead, it just petered out. There was no indication that the events were only in his mind – which is the only way that the novel would make any sort of sense. I even wondered if The Sea, The Sea held the first clues of Iris Murdoch’s dementia, but she wrote quite a few after this, so I suspect not.
Rarely have I been so cross with a book. Yes, any individual sentence or paragraph was beautifully written – but a series of beautiful sentences do not a novel make. And nobody at book group could explain it to me either.
So… I’m willing to give respected or recommended authors three attempts. That’s how I came to love books by Muriel Spark, Evelyn Waugh, and E.M. Forster. Iris Murdoch – you’ve had two swings and two misses. Third strike, and you’re out. We’ll see, we’ll see…
The Young Ardizzone
As I mentioned before Christmas (in the post from which I swiped this photo) I got a lovely Slightly Foxed edition of Edward Ardizzone’s The Young Ardizzone (1970) from my Virago Secret Santa, and I took it away with me for my few days of indulgent reading at the end of 2012. It was the first book I finished in 2013, and it amuses me that the year I found most elusive for A Century of Books was the first one I completed in 2013 – not that I’m doing that project this year. BUT it is going on Reading Presently. And what a lovely gift it was! It is – but of course – wonderful.
There are lots of teenage girls out there who go mad for Justin Bieber, or young boys who idolise football players (I’m afraid I can’t name any who weren’t playing back in 1998). In my own off-kilter way, I’m in danger of becoming a total fanboy for Slightly Foxed Editions. They’re just all good. There are other reprint publishers I love, as you know, but I think these are the most consistently wonderful offerings. No duds. Excuse me while I put a photo of the editorial team on my wall. Ahem.
Edward Ardizzone’s childhood seems to have been rather unusual, where parenting is concerned. He was born in 1900, in Tonkin, Vietnam, but moved to Suffolk, England when only five. His father, however, stayed behind, moving around Asia – visiting England at intervals, moving his family around the country (for he was certainly still married to Ardizzone’s mother, who spent four years out in Asia with him when Ardizzone was at boarding school) but playing minimal part in Ardizzone’s childhood. The chief figure was his tempestuous grandmother – Ardizzone often describes her going ‘black in the face with rage’, but adds that she ‘was normally gay, witty and affectionate’. More diverting relatives! Lucky Ed.
I always love reading about people’s childhoods, but I loved Ardizzone’s more than most, because it took place in East Bergholt. I’d initially thought, flicking through the book, that only a chapter or two took place in East Bergholt – but he is, in fact, there for a few years. It’s the village where my grandparents lived for about 40 years, and Our Vicar’s Wife was there for her final teenage years, so I know it pretty well. I even recognise the house Ardizzone lived in from this little sketch.
A very lovely village it is too. Here are some of his recollections:
Yet certain memories are with me still. A particular picnic in a hayfield during haymaking; a fine summer afternoon in a cornfield when the stooks of corn became our wigwams. A certain rutted lane with oak tree arching overhead and hedges so high that the lane looked like a green tunnel leading to the flats below.[…]Not far from the old parish church, with its strange bell cage planted down among the tombstones, was a round bounded on one side by a very high red brick wall. Set in this wall was a small gothic door. It was of wood and decorated with heavy iron studs. Beside this door was a wrought-iron bell pull.
It’s all quite simply told, but works well with the simple pictures. The name Ardizzone meant nothing to me when I received the book, but I did recognise his illustrations – although I don’t know where I encountered them – which are throughout the book as a delightful accompaniment. I must confess, to my unlearned eyes his draughtsmanship is not the very finest, and the comparisons Huon Mallalieu’s Preface makes with E.H. Shepard and Beatrix Potter seem a trifle generous. But, even with those reservations, his illustrations enhance the memoir no end. It is almost all done with lines and crosshatching, just a dot or two to suggest facial expressions.
Ardizzone didn’t enjoy school greatly – there are some incidents of bullying which seem to me quite shocking, but he only really mentions them in passing, without any suggestion that they have scarred him for life. And, indeed, his various school exploits take up most of the book – with plenty of cheerful moments, especially when describing respected schoolteachers.
I only wish Ardizzone hadn’t whipped quite so quickly through the final section of his autobiography – where he explains (in three or four pages) his progression from being shown by the London Group, favourably reviewed at the Bloomsbury Gallery, commissioned to illustrate a Le Fanu collection, and finally a successful children’s author/illustrator. He rattles through it all at breakneck speed, which is a shame, as it sounds a fascinating period in his life. So many autobiographers find their own childhood much more interesting than the rest of their life, and many of their readers would find everything interesting. Oh well. Mustn’t grumble; I’ll accept what Ardizzone has given us. And what he is given us is rather lovely.
Song for a Sunday
Happy Sunday, folks. Bridget Jones’s Diary is one of only three films that I have seen twice at the cinema, and it has a pretty fab soundtrack (once you let Geri Halliwell quietly out the back door). Here’s Rosey and ‘Love’.
Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany
Welcome to the first Weekend Miscellany of 2013! I hope you had a lovely Christmas and New Year, whoever you were with. As of Thursday, I’m back in Oxford, having refuelled on cat, countryside, and family.
1.) The blog post – lovely Thomas at My Porch has had a clear-out, and (as well as admiring his lovely shelves) you can put your name in the draw for his duplicate Dorothy Whipple books. US residents only, though, since he wanted to keep the Whipples in a country where they’re difficult to find. It’s open til 31st January.
2.) The link – I’ve yet to listen to it, but Mary has passed on the info about a Radio 4 programme on the incredible Margaret Rutherford. Click here for it. If I had a time machine, I’d probably (mis)use it just to go and see her on the stage as Miss Hargreaves. What bliss that would be…
3.) The book – I really loved The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets by Eva Rice (it was in my top books of 2008), so I was very excited to receive a review copy of her new book, The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp – with a lovely note from Eva too. My reading will be taken up by Vanity Fair for the foreseeable future, but Eva Rice’s is one of many 21st century books I’ve been holding off until A Century of Books was finished. If it’s half as good as The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets, then I’ll adore it!
And not forgetting… the readalong of Cheerful Weather for the Wedding is coming up soon! A lovely lot of people seemed keen – see here for details – I suggest we post reviews sometime in the week beginning Monday 28th January, and I’ll post links and have a discussion here. Fun fun!
2012 in First Lines
I seem to have all manner of year-in-review posts appearing or in the pipeline, but I can’t resist the one Jane reminded me about, which started with The Indextrious Reader, I think. It’s quite simple – use the first lines of each month on your blog, to give an overview of your blogging year (albeit one which is amusing rather than very useful!) This probably isn’t the ideal meme for me, since I tend to start my posts in a meandering way, eventually getting to the point after a paragraph or two…
January: “I have set myself the 2012 challenge of reading a book published in every year of the twentieth century…”
February: “I didn’t come back from Hay-on-Wye empty-handed (surprised?) and I thought I’d share my spoils with you.”
March: “The first book I read from my recent Hay-on-Wye haul was Kay Dick’s Ivy & Stevie (1971) about Ivy Compton-Burnett and Stevie Smith.”
April: “I feel I should do an April’s Fool… but I can’t think of anything. So let’s have a Song for a Sunday as normal, eh?”
May: “A very quick post today – in case you missed it on my previous post, Annabel/Gaskella has taken up the challenge of nominating another author for a reading week, and designing a great badge, and so… Beryl Bainbridge Reading Week will be hitting the blogosphere June 18-24!”
June: “There has been a bit of a theme on SiaB this year, hasn’t there?”
July: “I had a lovely break in Somerset, and was surprised by how well my little sale went – I’ll head off to the post office tomorrow, laden with parcels.”
August: “One of the weirder tangents my thesis has taken me on is the depiction of Satan in 20th-century literature…”
September: “Saturday night was a big barn dance for my parents’ wedding anniversary and my Mum’s birthday, with about 100 people coming.”
October: “Time for the third and final update on how A Century of Books is going!”
November: “Stu is otherwise known as Winston’s Dad, and knows more about literature in translation than anyone I know.”
December: “Happy Weekend, one and all. And happy December, no less.”
Well, wasn’t that productive? Do have a go yourself – and let me know in the comments if you have done so!
Reading Presently
![]() |
thanks to Agnieszka for making the badge! |
This will be the page for 2013’s project, where I’ll list my 50 Reading Presently books – books that were given to me as presents, along with their givers. I will never use the word ‘gifted’ as a verb, or ‘gifting’ at all. *Shudder*
1. Moranthology by Caitlin Moran – from my brother Colin
2. The Young Ardizzone by Edward Ardizonne – from Verity
3. What There Is To Say We Have Said : Eudora Welty & William Maxwell – from blog-reader Heather
4. The Diary of a Provincial Lady by E.M. Delafield – from Thomas
5. House of Silence by Linda Gillard – from Linda
6. A Spy in the Bookshop ed. John Saumarez Smith – from Lucy
7. Return to the Hundred Acre Wood by David Benedictus – from Verity
8. Is It Just Me? by Miranda Hart – from Lucy
9. How The Heather Looks by Joan Bodger – from Clare, maybe??
10. Room at the Top by John Braine – from John H.
11. Ella Minnow Pea by Mark Dunn – from Ruth
12. The Easter Party by Vita Sackville-West – from Hayley
13. The Saturdays by Elizabeth Enright – from Nichola
14. Skylark by Dezső Kosztolányi – from Our Vicar and Our Vicar’s Wife
15. Bassett by Stella Gibbons – from Barbara
16. The Library at Night by Alberto Manguel – from Colin
17. The Help by Kathryn Stockett – from dovegreybooks reading group
18. Four Hedges by Clare Leighton – from Clare
19. Books, Baguettes, and Bedbugs by Jeremy Mercer – from Charley
20. Some Tame Gazelle by Barbara Pym – from Mum
21. Virginia Woolf by Winifred Holtby – from Lucy
22. Of Love and Hunger by Julian Maclaren-Ross – from Dee
23. Oxford by Edward Thomas – from Daphne
24. Young Entry by Molly Keane – from Karyn
25. Dumb Witness by Agatha Christie – from Fiona
26. The Flying Draper by Ronald Fraser – from Tanya
27. A House in Flanders by Michael Jenkins – from Carol
28. The Restraint of Beasts by Magnus Mills – from Mel
29. The Queen and I by Sue Townsend – from OUP colleagues
30. Mr. Skeffington by Elizabeth von Arnim – from Rachel
31. Six Fools and a Fairy by Mary Essex – from Jodie
32. Cullum by E. Arnot Robertson – from Clare
33. Symposium by Muriel Spark – from Karen
34. Beowulf on the Beach by Jack Murnighan – from Colin
35. Pink Sugar by O. Douglas – from Clare
36. Time Will Darken It by William Maxwell – from Barbara
37. Hetty Dorval by Ethel Wilson – from Becca
38. Phantoms on the Bookshelves by Jacques Bonnet – from Clare
39. Faulks on Fiction by Sebastian Faulks – from Mum and Dad
40. The Compleat Mrs. Elton by Diana Birchall – from Diana
41. The Underground River by Edith Olivier – from Jane
42. Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim by David Sedaris – from Laura
43. A Reader on Reading by Alberto Manguel – from Lorna
44. Hyperbole and a Half by Allie Brosh – from Colin
45. My Grandfather and Father, Dear Father by Denis Constanduros – from Mum and Dad
46. The Best of Archy and Mehitabel by Don Marquis – from Barbara
47. Ten Days of Christmas by G.B. Stern – from Verity
48. Together and Apart from Margaret Kennedy – from Rob
49. Midsummer Night at the Workhouse by Diana Athill – from Mum
50. Black Sheep by Susan Hill – from Colin
Caitlin Moran is basically Dickens.
I’m going to start this review by getting all hipster – bear with me one moment while I put on my oversized specs and dig out some ironic vinyl records – and say that I loved Caitlin Moran before it was cool to love Caitlin Moran. Granted, I don’t buy a newspaper myself, or subscribe to The Times online, but my father and brother regard The Times as second only to Scripture and I flick through it when I visit either of them. More specifically, I have read Caitlin Moran’s columns for years. I don’t always agree with her, but I always find her brilliantly, ingeniously funny. The sort of funny that makes reading a newspaper actually fun.
Following on from the success of How To Be A Woman, which I have borrowed but have yet to read, a selection of her columns has been published under the title Moranthology. Geddit? Good. Her topics are widespread – a lot of celebrity-culture and arts & entertainment, but also just the world around her, from new dresses to Gregg’s pasties to tax (she’s pro.) Here’s how she glosses her inspirations in the introduction:
The motto I have Biro’d on my knuckles is that this is the best world we have – because it’s the only world we have. It’s the simplest maths ever. However many terrible, rankling, peeve-inducing things may occur, there are always libraries. And rain-falling-on-sea. And the Moon. And love. There is always something to look back on, with satisfaction, or forward to, with joy. There is always a moment when you boggle at the world – at yourself – at the whole, unlikely, precarious business of being alive – and then start laughing.
And that’s usually when I make a cup of tea, and start typing.
Caitlin Moran and I are unlikely ever to be friends. This is largely – though not entirely – because all her friendships seem to be assessed on the willingness with which said friend will breakdance, drunk out of their minds, in seedy clubs at four in the morning – or how much they admire Ghostbusters, which I’ve never seen. But, should our paths ever cross – at, say, 7.30 am, as she is stumbling back from a faux-Victorian strip club with Lady Gaga, and I am blearily crawling to the corner shop to get milk for my morning tea, not wearing any glasses because for some reason that only feels like a viable option in a post-caffeine world – should we meet, perhaps we would bond a little. Bond about our love of books (she champions libraries wonderfully; ‘A library in the middle of a community is a cross between an emergency exit, a life-raft, and a festival’) and our distrust of the Tory Party. Maybe even about how great Modern Family is, although that’s not mentioned here. But that might be it. I’ve never seen Sherlock, and I don’t much care for Doctor Who – these admissions are probably enough for Moran to cement-bag me to the bottom of the Thames, a la Mack the Knife. The columns where she reviews or goes behind the scenes of these shows are near-pathological in their adoration.
And, of course, there are plenty of other things we don’t agree about, or enthusiasms we don’t share. That’s beside the point. Moran could write about how much she likes dead-heading roses to make bonnets for foxes, and she’d make the hobby seem not only amusing, but rather bohemian and cool. Because Moran just is cool, without seeming to try at all. The sort of cool which entirely embraces self-deprecation and wears absurd foibles as badges of honour – and makes everything she writes seem adorable and awesome. (The only time I felt disappointed by Moran was when she referred to the ‘anti-choice’ movement. However strongly people may disagree over the issue of abortion, I’ve always deeply admired the almost-universal respectful use of ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice’ by those who oppose either one. Because, Moran – as well you know – absolutely nobody takes an anti-life or an anti-choice stance. That is never their objective.) But, that aside, she doesn’t put a foot wrong. She can babble about Downton Abbey, declare her hatred of children’s book/TV character Lola, or opine on her holidays to Wales, and it’s all just brilliant. And it’s brilliant because she has her tone down pat – a way with simile that is always innovative and hilarious (she, for instance, describes X Factor alum Frankie Cocozza as having ‘a voice like a goose being kicked down a slide’) and a clever mix of high and low registers which is positively Dickensian – throwing slang in with perfect judgement. Because (see above) she’s so cool.
And that mention of Dickens isn’t careless. Caitlin Moran is basically a 21st-century Dickens, with crazy awesome hair. In amongst all the hilarious columns on the ugliness of fish names or how someone stole her hairstyle, Moran gets in some serious social politics. So, like Dickens, she is incredibly funny – but uses the humour to slip in social commentary; the difference being that Dickens would give us a plucky urchin at the mercy of Sir Starvethechild. It would be glorious, but his point would be rather lost in a thicket of the grotesque. Moran, give or take some emotive wording, just tells it as it is.
Moran grew up on a council estate with eight siblings and parents who were on disability benefits. As she says, ‘I’ve spent twenty years clawing my way out of a council house in Wolverhampton, to reach a point where I can now afford a Nigella Lawson breadbin.’ But she still knows what poverty was like firsthand, and writes movingly, sensibly, and brilliantly about various issues to do with cutting benefits or alienating the poor.
All through history, those who can’t earn money have had to rely on mercy: fearful, changeable mercy, that can dissolve overnight if circumstances change, or opinions alter. Parish handouts, workhouses, almshouses – ad-hoc, makeshift solutions that make the helpless constantly re-audition in front of their benefactors; exhaustingly trying to re-invoke pity for a lifetime of bread and cheese.
That’s why the invention of the Welfare State is one of the most glorious events in history: the moral equivalency of the Moon Landings. Something not fearful or changeable, like mercy, but certain and constant – a right. Correct and efficient: disability benefit fraud is just 0.5 per cent. A system that allows dignity and certainty to lives otherwise chaotic with poverty and illness.
Who but Moran could write about her hatred of creating party-bags, her love of David Attenborough and her friend with schizophrenia who has to move cities in order to retain state-given accommodation? Not in the same column, you understand, but I wouldn’t put it past her. Moran has won all sorts of awards, I believe, and I would say that she deserves them – but, quite frankly, she is the only columnist I ever read. I’ve been enjoying her columns for years (some in this book are, naturally, revisits for me) and I’m so delighted that they’re now available as a book. I’ve got my fingers crossed for another, since this can only represent a small percentage of her output. But I’ll count my blessings with this one (thanks Colin for giving it to me!) and urge you to seek it out. Like I said, Moran is basically Dickens. Hilariously funny, socially conscious, rocks some impressive sideburns. Well, two out of three ain’t bad.