I know I usually point you in the direction of my Vulpes Libris posts, but I really, really encourage you to read my review of Eudora Welty’s The Optimist’s Daughter (1972) as it is phenomenally good. Find out more over at Vulpes Libris…
All
Stuck-in-a-Book Answers…
Well, that went even better than I’d hoped! Thanks so much for your questions, there was a wonderful mix, including some which had me lying awake at night trying to work out my answers. Anyway, here are all my answers – I have grouped the questions vaguely into, erm, groups… I’ve given the name of the person who asked, using the username which appears in the comment box.
Do link in the comments if you are doing your own Q&A!
Reading and Books
Heavenali asks… If you had a literary time machine which literary world would you transport yourself to?
If I could just be a fly on the wall, and wouldn’t have to interact, it would be the Bloomsbury Group as they gathered at Charleston – so I could see how great, bohemian writers and artists interacted on a minute-by-minute basis. Surely life couldn’t all be grand realisations about art and culture?
Thomas asks… Which novel that is least like your life/personal frame of reference/state of grace did you like the most?
I don’t seem to read any books that are particularly like my life – and I tend to feel most at home in those that are about women in a different period and different class from me… so I’ll go with the bit about a character who would appal me in real life, and pick Ned Beauman’s Boxer, Beetle.
Claire asks… If you were to start your own publishing house, what would its focus be?
I’d love to have a slightly quirkier version of Persephone Books. Nicola Beauman and I have chatted about this – that my taste wanders off into the surreal more than hers does (and that’s the basis of my DPhil). So, I’d love to see books like Miss Hargreaves, Lady Into Fox, Lolly Willowes, and their ilk under the same imprint.
Claire asks… What are five out-of-print books you think are most deserving of a reprint?
Fun! The best question to be asked. Well, it’s criminal that Ivy Compton-Burnett isn’t in print, and my favourite of hers (so far) is More Women Than Men. A.A. Milne’s Mr. Pim Passes By (the novel rather than the play) is hilarious and should be made easily available, as should his brilliant autobiography It’s Too Late Now – and I know you agree, Claire! E.M. Delafield’s collection of sketches As Others Hear Us is delicious – and now she’s out of copyright, someone should get onto it. Barbara Comyns’ The Skin Chairs will finish off my list – so there are the first five books for my publishing house(!)
Tina asks… How many books have you got in total and of these how many are not read?
According to LibraryThing I have 2341 books, and have tagged 908 of them as read… which leaves 1433 unread, but that does include a fair few reference books etc. But still… I’m unlikely to run out of things to read any time soon. Might have to do Project 24 again next year…
Tina asks… How many are in your house and how many with your parents?
Now I’ll have to guess. Probably about 500 in Oxford and the rest in Somerset?
Thomas asks… Would you ever go for a whole month where you only read books that were published this century?
Yeah, I reckon I’d give it a go. I’d find that easier than any century earlier than the 20th.
Authors
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings asks… Which author, dead or alive, would you most like to meet.have met?
I think it’s going to be Jane Austen. I don’t know how long we’d be able to chat for, because our lives are so different, but simply for the honour, it would be she.
Annabel asks… Which authors, dead or alive, would you invite to a dinner party?
I puzzled over this one for a while. Because it’s not the same answer as Kaggsy’s question – I wouldn’t want anybody I’d be too in awe of, and there are plenty of writers I love who would dislike me for my class, faith, or age. So I settled on Monica Dickens, Herbert Jenkins, and Denis Mackail – all of whom seem like they’d be good fun. Although I have picked three authors I don’t know much about.
Annabel asks… Assuming you lived somewhere with other houses close by, which authors do you think would make good neighbours?
Interesting… I’m not sure what I look for in neighbours. Quiet people, who’d be dependable in an emergency, perhaps, and wouldn’t be too noisy. Richmal Crompton strikes me as someone of that sort.
Thomas asks… Which Trollope do you prefer? Anthony or Joanna?
Well, I’ve not read anything by Joanna Trollope, and I love the one book I’ve read by Anthony Trollope (The Warden), so… there’s your answer!
Mike Walmer asks… I remember you blogging at some point that you’ve got all of Barbara Comyns’ books. Since Birds in Tiny Cages is one of the rarest books in the universe, I’d like to know where you found your copy.
What I should have said is that I’ve got or have read all of her novels. This one, as you say, is basically impossible to buy – but I did manage to track down a copy via Interlibrary Loan. It’s not very good…
Thomas asks… List one living author that everyone in book blogging circles loves that you have no desire to read.
Philip Pullman.
Vintage Reading asks… Which is your favourite Austen novel?
Always a tussle between Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility – I think the former wins, although I find the latter more amusing. Persuasion is at the bottom of the pile, but I’ve only read it once, when I was 17, so should revisit.
Thomas asks… If you had to limit yourself to only reading one novelist for the rest of your life, who would it be?
E.M. Delafield, because she does humour and melancholy both so wonderfully, which would give me some variety. Plus I’d happily read Diary of a Provincial Lady over and over forever.
Thomas asks… Have you read May Sarton yet? Why not?
But I have, sir, and years ago! I’ve read As We Are Now and thought it was quite good – but I’m afraid that’s all the impression it made on me.
Dark Puss asks… Why haven’t you read anything by Colette yet?
Haha! The same reason I haven’t read books by any number of authors whom I’m sure I’d find interesting… time, the number of books around, and being in the right mood. But I do have quite a few of her books, so I certainly will… one day…
Tina asks… Can you review Elizabeth Cambridge’s Susan and Joanna?
I still haven’t read it, Tina! One day, one day…
Epsie asks… I would be really grateful if you could answer that eternally puzzling question – Shakespeare: was he a woman?
You pose an excellent question, madam! For everyone else… this was our standard undergraduate essay question suggestion, when we couldn’t think of anything else to write. It works for any author… in this case, I’m going to say… probs.
Life and Work
Diana asks… How do you do it all? (And she elaborates beautifully!)
You suspect right that I don’t sleep enough – my mother jumped in and said that I sleep a lot, but that’s because when she sees me in Somerset I’m usually in a state of collapse! But, honestly, I always feel like I don’t do very much in my days, so it must be an illusion…
Claire asks… What do you hope your life looks like 5 years from now?
I’m the worst person at life-planning – I just amble along and see what happens. My one big plan – hopefully before five years is up – is to live in the countryside again.
Susan T. Case asks… Are you a lark or an owl?
Sort of both, in that I feel quite alert in mornings and evenings, but afternoons are anathema to me… England needs to bring in the siesta tradition. I’m always semi-comatose in the afternoon – and during my first year at university my tutorials were always at 2pm, which must have given my tutor a terrible impression of me.
Susan T. Case asks… Are you a fussy or messy housekeeper?
Nearer messy than fussy… I like to think I’m not a total slob, but my room is often a bit, erm, disordered.
Thomas asks… If you had to get a DPhil in some other subject, what would it be?
I’d be utterly hopeless at any other subject, but I do have an amateur interest in psychology/neuroscience.
Harriet asks… If you had the chance to write one book, guaranteed publication, what would it be?
It would definitely be a novel of some variety, and I have a vague idea of writing a novelisation of (part of) A.A. Milne’s life. If I could do that well, I’d choose that, as I owe AAM so much in my reading life.
Donna asks… Do you use a fountain pen or a biro? Are you a Parker, caran d’ache, or Mont Blanc sort of guy?
I used to use a fountain pen (Parker!) all the time, but seem to retreat to biros more often now. But you have encouraged me to go back to my fountain pen – my writing is much more legible when I’m using it, and it makes me feel more like Virginia Woolf, which is all I want in life.
Susan T. Case asks… Favourite dinner? Which real and fictional people would you invite?
My favourite food is the ‘umble cheese sandwich (cheddar cheese; the best crusty white loaf money can buy) but that’s not really dinner food, is it? I love roast potatoes but vegetarians don’t have the best range of things to accompany them. The real people I’d most like to invite are my brother and parents – I’m always at my happiest when they’re with me. And fictional people? I’d love to have dinner with John Ames from Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead, as he is about the wisest character I’ve read, or perhaps Betty Macdonald’s persona in The Egg and I, as that would be a laugh – so long as we didn’t have to cook it at her ranch. For humour, it would be almost any collection of characters from PG Wodehouse… so long as I could duck under the table when things inevitably went wrong.
Thomas asks… Which TV show are you most embarrassed to admit that you watch?
I make a point of being gently self-mocking – getting in there before anyone else does – so I’m more likely to make a joke of one of these than be embarrassed by it. At the same time, I felt a bit ashamed by being beguiled by Gogglebox. Look it up…
Susan T. Case asks… Favourite guilty pleasure TV viewing and snack?
This is subtly different… my favourite is probably the soap opera Neighbours, which I love and ridicule in equal measures, but wholeheartedly love. It’s no coincidence that I my two best friends both watched Neighbours through university – I think we bonded through our lunch and Neighbours meet-ups. As for snack – I am currently a bit obsessed with popcorn, which is dangerous.
Claire asks… Sweater vests or cardigans? Do you see your preference changing as you age?
Oh, definitely cardies! I don’t see myself changing, as the spectre of Chandler and his sweater vests (or pullovers, as we call them!) would prevent me.
Geography
Thomas asks… What job would be so fabulous that it could induce you to live in a big city (e.g., London)? And don’t just say there isn’t one, which would come closest?
SIAB Q&A
I don’t know if this will work – that is up to you guys! – but I thought it might be fun to hold a Q&A. I was inspired by the fab 100th episode of The Readers – it’s no secret that I long to appear on the show, only now they don’t have guest presenters – but I thought I can still borrow good ideas from them, one of which is a bookish Q&A. (Do go and listen to their 100th ep, of course.)
So… any questions you have for me about books, reading suggestions, reading habits, my life, my blogging, Shiny New Books, my DPhil, Sherpa… please pop ’em in the comments or ask on twitter @stuck_inabook. And then, at some point next week, I’ll answer them!
I’d love to see this sort of thing on other people’s blogs too – it’s a great way to interact a bit more. So, fingers crossed that it works! I’ve got a busy Bank Holiday Weekend, so I’ll see you on Tuesday…
Let’s Explore Diabetes With Owls – David Sedaris
Would you believe that there’s still one of my reviews from Issue 1 of Shiny New Books that I haven’t shared with you? It’s of David Sedaris’ Let’s Explore Diabetes With Owls – a terrible title but a good book of funny and moving essays. With some misfires along the way. Intrigued? Read the whole review over at Shiny New Books…
Delight – J.B. Priestley
In 2009 I read a fun book called Modern Delight, in which various authors and others talked about the things that most bring them delight. I mentioned it in a Weekend Miscellany, but don’t think I ever got around to a proper post about it. It was enjoyable and fun, and for a good cause. Also published at that point was a reprint of the book that inspired it – Delight (1949) by J.B. Priestley.
Somehow I didn’t get a copy of it then, but when I was in Malvern recently I stumbled across an original edition of Delight and couldn’t resist it – it became my dipping-in-and-out-of book. And (yes, this mini-review writes itself), it was a delight!
I haven’t read any of Priestley’s novels, although I’ve read one play and seen another – and read a fair bit of his journalism as part of my DPhil research. Delight shows quite a different side to him. Basically, it is short pieces on 114 things which delight him. Why this number, I don’t know.
Priestley claims to be an old grumbler (he was actually only in his mid-50s, and would live ’til a month shy of 90) and this was his way of making up to those around him. And the things that delight him are truly delightful – covering the silly (charades, playing with small children, fantastic theories), the moving (coming home), the scholarly (Shakespeare re-discovered, discovering Vermeer), and the bizarre (mineral water in bedrooms of foreign hotels). Above all, they are wonderfully engaging, often very amusing, and show a writer who knew how to put together a book that is at once utterly unnecessary and wholly (yes, again) a delight. Here’s an excerpt from Delight no.1, about fountains:
And I believe my delight in these magical jets of water, the invention of which does credit to our whole species, is shared by ninety-nine persons out of every hundred. But where are they, these fountains we love? We hunger for them and are not fed. A definite issue could be made out of this, beginning with letters to the Times, continuing with meetings and unanimous resolutions and deputations to Downing Street, and ending if necessary with processions and mass demonstrations and some rather ugly scenes. What is the use of our being told that we live in a democracy if we want fountains and have no fountains?
Well – as someone who once traipsed around Torquay trying to find the precise fountain that my friend had seen in her youth, I can empathise. But you need not worry about wanting Delight and not finding a copy – there are plenty around, particularly the 2009 reprint. I can think of a few dozen bloggers and blog readers who would love this… it’s just the sort of gem that deserves to be on a reader’s shelves.
Bello Books
Do you know of Bello Books? They are an offshoot of Macmillan, I believe, and do print on demand paperbacks and ebooks, reprinting lost voices. And, oh, their catalogue is divine! They seem to be browsing my bookshelves – and my wishlist – to come up with some of their titles. Reprints will be coming soon from Christopher Milne, Ann Thwaite, Edith Olivier, Pamela Hansford Johnson, and…
Vita Sackville-West (thanks for sending these, Bello!) You can see their latest catalogue here, and investigate the site more generally here. General hurrahs for Bello!
Oh, Agatha
Oh dear, have I really not blogged since last Wednesday? I’m sorry, I’m being very negligent – and I can’t even think of a reason why, as it hasn’t been an especially busy week. Perhaps it’s my general reading slump at the moment – and, if you’ve been around for any of my previous reading slumps, you’ll probably know what my solution has been. Dame Agatha Christie. If you hate spoilers of any variety (and I’ll only talking about the death which happens in the first few pages) then skim read this post…
Yes, that’s right, I’ve ignored the hundreds of unread books in my house – and the few that I’m reading at the moment – and taken myself to Oxford Central Library to borrow some Agathas. Almost all of mine are at home, and the ones I have here don’t fall into blank years in A Century of Books – and, if I’m reading Agatha, I may as well kill two birds with one stone. Still, with the criteria of being (a) not read read, (b) filling blank years, and (c) currently in library stock, I managed to come away with two books – Hallowe’en Party and The Seven Dials Mystery, and whipped through the first in a couple of days.
I’d always steered clear of it, because of my distaste for Hallowe’en, but it’s pretty incidental to the plot. And, as plot is so important in Christie novels, I’m not going to tell you much beyond the initial murder – which is of a young girl at a Hallowe’en party, who is drowned in an apple bobbing bucket. Shortly before this, she has begun to tell people that she once witnessed a murder, only she didn’t realise it was a murder until much later. They won’t listen – but it seems that perhaps someone present has taken her comment seriously… Hercule Poirot, naturally, comes to sort things out, called there by Ariadne Oliver. I have five main things I want to say about this novel:
1.) I love Christie plots about misinterpretation – where a witness sees someone looking shocked that something is there, when in fact they’re shocked that something isn’t there; when a look of horror is about a memory rather than a current event – all those sorts of things, for some reason, are wonderful to me. So I loved that element of Hallowe’en Party.
2.) I’ve never read an Ariadne Oliver novel before, and I love her. And Agatha Christie obviously had a lot of fun creating her (she is a detective novelist, with a Finnish detective hero, and Christie uses her as a bit of a mouthpiece…)
3.) This is Christie’s child-killing novel… it’s interesting for the number of times (and this isn’t a spoiler) she talks about leniency for mentally imbalanced killers or those who’ve been through care, or whatever extenuating circumstances, and how Poirot doesn’t think justice should be considered less important than mercy.
4.) It was published in 1969 – so nearly 50 years after Poirot’s first case and Christie’s first novel. Amazing that she could still be on such good form after all that time.
5.) And it is a very good novel. I found the conclusion a little unsatisfying, mostly because I’d already guessed the solution, or at least most of it, and I much prefer being surprised by the end of a detective novel.
So, there you go. Onto The Seven Dials Mystery…
Two links…
A quick post today, with two exciting things!
Shiny New Update – we’ve launched the ‘inbetweeny’ for Shiny New Books! Issue 2 will be out in early July, but to keep you busy til then we’ve added a handful of new reviews and features to every – find out more on the site.
Limerick competition – at OxfordWords, the blog I help out with at OUP, we’ve launched a limerick competition where you can win an iPad (slightly higher class prizes there than at Stuck-in-a-Book!) All details here.
Three Plays
I’ve been quite the culture vulture of late, and have seen three plays – and somehow haven’t managed to write about any of them. So I’m going to whip through all thee of them quickly in one post… I have more to say about the first than the others, but they were all great in different ways.
Good People at Hampstead Theatre
My friend Andrea and I took a trip off to Hampstead (where I saw a very good play about Katherine Mansfield and D.H. Lawrence, On The Rocks by Amy Rosenthal a few years ago) and we saw Good People by David Lindsay-Abaire. It’s since transferred to the Noel Coward, where it will be ’til 14 June, so I don’t feel guilty about recommending what would have been the last performance.
Truth be told, we went because Imelda Staunton was in it – and I knew essentially nothing else about it. To me, Imelda will always be the Provincial Lady (a role she took in a Radio 4 dramatisation) but I also love her in Vera Drake, Another Year, and all sorts of other things. She was on my bucket list of actors to see, and this was a brilliant play to see her in.
Basically it’s about being poor in America. Imelda has a strong Boston accent from the first scene, where her character Margaret is fired from her job at a checkout for being consistently tardy – which is because of her disabled daughter. We next see her with her friends Jean (Lorraine Ashbourne) and Dottie (June Watson) – both of whom are loud and animated, and especially while playing bingo (which is where they head next). There is plenty of talk about how to cope without income and without prospects – when Margaret learns that her old schoolfriend Mike is back in town. And she wonders if he’ll perhaps give her a job…
Mike (Lloyd Owen) is a big success – a doctor – but he has become what Margaret calls ‘lace curtains’. He’s offended; he thinks he’s still Southy at heart. But he won’t give her a job; he doesn’t need a new receptionist. This escalates into a perfectly balanced argument about whether or not he has stayed true to his roots – never quite a shouting match, but never far from it – and he invites her to a party he’s having with his young and beautiful wife Kate (Angel Coulby, whom I know from underrated teen drama As If). Neither of them think she’ll go, and he phones to say it is cancelled… angrily she goes. And then the already brilliant play gets even more brilliant.
The scene is so well written, and so well acted. The audience don’t know precisely what the truth is about the history between Margaret and Mike; neither does his wife. And no emotion is straightforward in this scene (or, indeed, this play). Margaret – and this is Imelda’s play, she is extraordinary – is angry, hopeful, regretful, proud, witty, even a bit forgiving. It’s a spectacular character, so complex, and needs an actress as astonishingly talented as Imelda Staunton to fill it. So much power comes from such a tiny woman! Having said that, it is more of an ensemble production than I’d imagined from the advertising – the whole cast is brilliant, and it’s probably in the top three plays I’ve ever seen. Very emotional, also very funny. Do go and see it if you have a chance.
OH, and we waited around in the foyer afterwards, and spotted Imelda Staunton’s husband (Jim Carter, aka Mr Carson in Downton Abbey) – AND we braved going and asking for her signature. She was very sweet, and we were buzzing all the way back to the coach home.
The Play That Goes Wrong by the Mischief Theatre Company
From the emotional and poignant to the unashamedly hilarious. I took a day trip to Malvern, in my old stamping ground of Worcestershire, and saw the touring production of The Play That Goes Wrong (go and see if they’re touring anywhere near you). It’s essentially a spoof of Agatha Christie’s The Mousetrap in the tradition of Michael Frayn’s Noises Off (so I’m lead to believe, having not seen it.)
An amateur dramatic society is putting on a murder mystery play. It goes wrong in every conceivable way, from even before the play begins, as the stagehands are trying to keep a mantelpiece in place (aided by a lucky member of the audience).
The actors forget their lines, they accidentally repeat them, mispronounce them, or they make no sense because of bad staging or props (I particularly loved “Is that your father’s portrait?” collapsing into despair, as the actor realises that the portrait is actually of a dog in a deerstalker.) An actress is knocked out, and replaced by a reluctant – but increasingly enthusiastic – stagehand. But what I most loved was the way in which the stage fell apart. It just kept collapsing, more and more, including the supporting pillar for a mezzanine level, which falls to a steeper incline at intervals throughout the rest of the play – which means a couple of very talented and very agile actors have to keep furniture from falling to the ground, while still delivering their lines.
It’s all very silly, but impressively done. Some of the actors are more able than others at convincingly being actors (if you see what I mean) but it’s not exactly a play which requires staunch realism. But the biggest applause should go to the set designer and set builder – its deconstruction is like choreography. I laughed hard all night, as did the good people of Malvern – they were definitely ready to be amused. (One sidenote: any accident can be masked as deliberate in this sort of play, which did lead to some audience confusion when one of our number was led out, and the ‘lights guy’ – an actor too – was involved. Turns out she was just ill.
Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw
This one probably doesn’t need any introduction. Some colleagues from OUP and I went to the Oxford Playhouse to see Alastair McGowan (also Worcestershire’s finest, fyi) play Henry Higgins in My Fair Lady without the songs. Just in case you don’t know the premise, Higgins has a bet with a friend that he can pass off a Cockney flower girl as a Duchess in the space of a few months, simply by training her in manners and voice. It basically works, but Higgins is an unobservant cad and doesn’t realise the emotional effect the process is having on Eliza Doolittle.
It was an amusing production of an amusing play. I also discovered that Shaw was a lot less progressive than he thought – or, rather, he was ahead of his time in terms of sexism and classism, but very much behind our time. Oh, but he does LOVE to labour a point – the final scene hit us over the head with his point so many times that he’d make Ibsen seem subtle. But that’s all par for the course – it was a great production, and my only real complaint was that it didn’t have any songs. (Ahem.)
Patch Picks a Prizewinner!
It’s been over a month since I started my 7th birthday prize draw, but fear not, I have not forgotten it!
I also got a lovely email recently from a blog reader called Vicki, and she mentioned that she liked seeing Patch helping with prize draws in the past. I realised I hadn’t called on his services for some time, and he was more than willing to oblige… (as you see, there are two colours of paper – but we closed our eyes when picking a winner.)
The prize wasn’t revealed before – other than the warning that it’ll be a bit tatty – but I can now reveal that it will be two books by authors I love dearly: The Skin Chairs by Barbara Comyns and The Ridleys by Richmal Crompton.
Congratulations to…
Well done Helen! I think I probably have your address somewhere, but I’ll email to confirm…