Book Blogger Appreciation Week: Day 1

Just under a year after I started blogging in April 2007, I discovered My Friend Amy and her Book Blogger Appreciation Week. I know I contributed that year; I can’t remember which other years (if any) I gave it a go, but I know there has been a lull for a while. Well, now four bloggers are co-hosting a revival! You can find out all you need to at The Estella Society. Do join in if you can be tempted!

Day 1: Introduce yourself by telling us about five books that represent you as a person or your interests/lifestyle.

I think this is a bit different from ‘five favourite books’ – long-term readers of my blog will know all of them anyway – so I’ll try to diversify a bit.

BBAW

The Feminine Middlebrow Novel, 1920s to 1950s by Nicola Humble

This wonderful overview of novels of the period was the bedrock of my DPhil thesis, and could serve as an introduction to so many books that I love and cherish (not least Guard Your Daughters). It’s scholarly but definitely accessible, and I eulogised about it at length over at Vulpes Libris.

The Bible

I tend to take this one as read, so this time I’ll actually mention. If Humble’s book was the bedrock of my thesis, this is the bedrock of my life.

Ex Libris by Anne Fadiman

This was the first new book I ever bought spontaneously, knowing nothing about it before I picked it up. I was about 17, and it rang so true to me: it is essentially a series of essays about the life of every obsessive reader and book-lover.

The Lark by E. Nesbit

I only read and wrote about this novel recently, but I think it sums up a lot about what I love to be as a reader: funny, dive-inable, early 20th-century novels about everything and nothing, that are a little off the beaten track. And I love novels about flower shops, sure.

More Women Than Men by Ivy Compton-Burnett

This one can stand for the slightly more lyrical, quirky, style-front-and-centre type of novel that I also love – as well as flying the flag for the ineffably wonderful Ivy C-B. I’m unlikely ever to work in a girl’s school (though this novel couldn’t be less like your average school story); this one is definitely about me as a reader than about my interests!

Over to you all…

 

Introducing The 1938 Club

The 1938 ClubDrum roll, please! After the success of The 1924 Club (we were so delighted with the response and support!) Karen and I vowed to make various clubs a bi-annual event, in April and October each year for as long as we are inspired to hold it. We’ll probably dart around with different years at different times, but Ali’s suggestion of 1938 sounded great. On the cusp of war, it is a fascinating time for literature all across the world… we think! We need your help to find out.

For those who missed The 1924 Club, what happens is simple: we ask bloggers and blog readers to read a book published in 1938, and to write about it during one week. We welcome novels, stories, non-fiction, poetry, absolutely anything from anywhere in the world – and together we can build up a much broader sense of the year than could be achieved by an individual reader. There won’t be a single ethos for 1938, of course, but there will hopefully be a fantastic cross-section.

This time we’re giving more warning! You’ve got a couple of months to dig out 1938 books to join in: The 1938 Club will kick off on 11th April 2016 for a week.

We particularly love it when people find unusual or quirky choices, especially if they turn into fantastic recommendations, but if you need somewhere to start then the Wikipedia page for 1938 in literature should help! If you fancy going for a famous book, Rebecca and Brighton Rock fit the bill. I know I’ve got a Richmal Crompton and a Dorothy Baker looking at me, and have been meaning to read Cyril Connolly’s Enemies of Promise for a long time, but have yet to finalise what I’ll be reading…

Do borrow the badge and spread the word, or let us know what you’re thinking of reading – or just if you’re hoping to join in at all! We’re already excited, and hope you are too.

An excellent birthday present (and whatnot)

I’m not reading much at the moment; I was already feeling the onset of Reader’s Block and then I got a cold. It is one of life’s infuriating truths that time lying in bed comes accompanied with an inability to read. Chuh. But it does remind me that I have yet to share one of the best birthday presents I got last November (when it was, it will come as no surprise, my birthday). This came from my housemate Kirsty, and it’s rather special:

EMD letter

 

It’s not a good photo of it, because it’s dark, but… it’s a letter by E.M. Delafield! Very exciting to have on my shelf. The message ‘I have pleasure in acceding your request’ is equally intriguing…

In other news, I am giving up buying books for Lent. What am I thinking? I hope I will be able to redirect those energies to prayer etc., but I also feel like the last moments of pre-Lent should be spent in choosing books to buy. But, you know what, I can’t even think of any that I want right now.

…though I have preordered one that comes out in early March, which I’d done before I decided this Lenten fast.

Fingers crossed the Reader’s Block passes with the cold. Still, plenty of books to review left on my shelves, so perhaps I’ll redirect my reading time to reviewing time? Or even writing time, since my New Year’s Resolution was to write a letter a week, and I’ve also been getting on with a novel in a little writing club with some friends from work. More on that one day, perhaps, but not right now – except to say that I’m about 20,000 words in and not unpleased with what I’ve written. More progress than I ever got through self-discipline alone!

Introduction to Sally by Elizabeth von Arnim

Reprints Issue 8

I really did mean to review Introduction to Sally (1926) back when I read it before I attended the Elizabeth von Arnim conference last year, but… oops. I don’t think it’s one of her best regarded novels, but I thought it was fantastic – and heard a great paper on it too. It’s rather more high concept than the others I’ve read: essentially, what would happen if a hyperbolically beautiful woman was born in a working-class environment? What if a Greek goddess came to life – but only with the looks, not with any of the powers or bravado?

Spoilers: it doesn’t go particularly well.

This novel makes an intriguing counterpoint to Zuleika Dobson, Max Beerbohm’s 1910 novel about a woman so attractive that all the undergraduates at Oxford University fall in love with her; Sally, likewise, attracts every man who sees her. The difference is that Zuleika welcomes and expects it: Sally would just like to get on with her life, and humble shopkeeper Mr Pinner (her father) is just keen that she gets married quickly, to avoid being taken advantage of by the nearby Cambridge university undergraduates. As the opening line states with typical von Arnim panache, ‘Mr Pinner was God-fearing man, who was afraid of everything except respectability.’

We start with a quick back story: Sally is short for Salvatia, being a much-longed-for daughter. Her mother sadly dies, and Mr Pinner is anxious and fraught, and not the sort of man who could put a defence against very much. Sally is docile and naive, unaware of the affect her beauty has as she grows older. Her naivety becomes quite the hallmark of the novel; she is as exaggeratedly simple and good as she is beautiful, making this all rather like a fairy tale – or, rather, a fairy tale character plunged into the slings and arrows of the real world.

The real world comes into the shop in the form of Jocelyn Luke. He is fine-speaking and high-falutin’, horrifying Mr Pinner until he realises that Luke is proposing marriage. To please her father, chiefly, Sally accepts – though she has little idea what Luke is saying when he quotes poetry or expresses his undying love. Von Arnim writes these scenes brilliantly; they are funny while also carrying dark undertones.

Jocelyn sat down too, the table between them, the light from the oil lamp hanging from the ceiling beating down on Sally’s head.

“And Beauty was made flesh, and dwelt among us,” he murmured, his eyes burning.

“Pardon?” said Sally, polite, but wishing her father would come back.

She is shy and uncertain, and very much of her class. She drops her ‘h’s, says ‘I don’t mind if I do’ rather than ‘yes’, and is generally full of habits and tics that would make Eliza Doolittle blush.

This is all very well at first, but it soon grows to infuriate Jocelyn. All Sally wants is to be a good, honest, quiet wife and mother, and von Arnim has no great notions about the egalitarian nature of marriage. If there is a message in this novel (and perhaps there is not) it is that a marriage between ‘non-equals’ cannot possibly work. In this particular marriage, Sally has to put up with Jocelyn’s interfering mother (while she, in turn, has to cope with attentions of her brash neighbour Mr Thorpe), and she finds that situation equally difficult – though with the sort of fatalistic pragmatism that von Arnim writes beautifully.

Sally’s knees shook. She clutched the grey wrap tighter still about her. Mr. Luke’s mother was so terribly like Mr. Luke. Two of them. She hadn’t bargained for two of them. And she was worse than he was, because she was a lady. Gentlemen were difficult enough, but they did every now and then cast themselves at one’s feet and make one feel one could do what one liked for a bit, but a lady wouldn’t; a lady would always stay a lady.

The chief difficulty is Jocelyn Luke’s monstrous jealousy. He cannot cope with any man speaking to Sally, believing – often quite rightly – that they have designs on her. When she meets anybody with whom she can have a normal conversation, he gets in the way and tries to isolate her. This fairy tale turns dark – though Luke’s rod of iron comes from hysterical jealousy rather than malice.

The ending is a little less engaging; it feels rather as though von Arnim has written herself into a corner, and has to find a solution that isn’t too bleak – but what makes this novel great is von Arnim’s writing style. Line by line, she shows her wry wit and her well-practised ability to turn a sentence. This may not have the charm of an Enchanted April, nor the realism of some of other dark works, but it is a triumph of its variety of twisted fairy tale. I loved it, and highly recommend tracking it down.

Death on the Riviera by John Bude

Death on the RivieraAnother Shiny New Books review – this time of the latest British Library Crime Classic, and my first John Bude (despite having the rest of them on my shelf!), 1952’s Death on the Riviera. He does get wonderful covers, doesn’t he? To be honest, it’s not my favourite of their offerings – Alan Melville still holds that crown – but it’s good fun. Read the whole review, or be enticed by the opening to it…

I’ve got all the John Bude reprints that have appeared in the British Library Crime Classics series, and have given several to other people, but Death on the Riviera (1952) is actually the first of his that I’ve read. Like all the others, he has been given a beautiful cover – but what of the contents? Well, it’s a fun detective novel that won’t stand up to rigorous examination, but is none the less enjoyable for that.

Gratitude by Oliver Sacks

GratitudeThe first of my reviews from Shiny New Books that I’ll be pointing you towards is… a little book called Gratitude by Oliver Sacks, and the final book that will ever be published under his name. Read the whole review here, or be enticed by the opening of it…

I’ve had the privilege of reviewing three different books by Oliver Sacks for Shiny New Books now, but this is the first since his sad death last year. By the time his autobiography On The Move was published, we already knew that Sacks had fatal cancer – though he didn’t know it when the manuscript was handed in. So the difference between his autobiography and three of the four essays here is precisely that: these are written with an awareness of mortality and this, indeed, is often their theme.

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

Thus Were Their FacesHowdy y’all – hope you’re all having lovely weekends. It’s beautifully sunny here in Oxford, but in a few hours I’ll be hopping on a plane for a very short trip to Glasgow (no time to find any bookshops, boo) – I’ll let you know all about that afterwards. For now, here’s a book, a blog post, and a link…

1.) The book – I heard on the Reading the End podcast that Helen Oyeyemi was having a collection of short stories out later this year, and while searching for that (FYI, it’s What Is Not Yours Is Not Yours and is out in April in the UK, possibly earlier in the US) I came across an NYRB she’d written an introduction for. It’s a collection of short stories called Thus Were Their Faces by Silvina Ocampo, and sounds darkly, weirdly fascinating. Does anybody know anything about it?

2.) The blog post – it’s got to be the link round-up post for Margery Sharp Day over at Beyond Eden Rock.

3a.) The link – thanks to Biana the publicist for sending me this link, to a video of the highlights from the Costa Book Awards, which seems like a fun thing to embed:

3b.) The sneaky second link – can you match the grammar abilities expected of 7 year olds under the new curriculum? I’m sad to say I got 10/11 – I feel like by now I should be able to ace a test for 7 year olds…

Shiny New Books: Issue 8

As usual, I’ll tell you more about individual posts – but Shiny New Books Issue 8 is now live!

SNB-logo

Writing in haste… but do go and have an explore. It’s the usual mix of great fiction, non-fiction, reprints, and BookBuzz features – slimmer than usual as we’ve been particularly keen to include only our favourites. Many thanks to my wonderful co-editors Annabel, Harriet, and Victoria!

 

The Eye of Love by Margery Sharp

The Eye of LoveI’m rather astonished that I’m managing to join in with the Margery Sharp celebrations at Beyond Eden Rock (organised by Jane) – chiefly because I only managed to start The Eye of Love (1957) on Saturday, and have had a very busy weekend. Indeed, it’s been a busy old year so far, which is the reason I must give for not having published as many blog posts as I’d intended so far. But the combination of fierce determination and (more importantly) Sharp’s excellent writing have made me finish just in time.

The Eye of Love is the third Sharp novel I’ve read so far, and it’s been on my shelves for many years. The reason I chose this one is because it turns out it’s the only one I have in Oxford (I had intended to go with Britannia Mews) – but it is rather lovely, and (sorry, but the connection is irresistible) sharp.

This is Sharp’s quirky take on a romance novel, her motif being that the ‘eye of love’ sees things that other eyes cannot; basically, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In this case, the beholders are a middle-aged couple, one of whom (born Dorothy Hogg, but choosing instead the name Dolores Diver) fancies herself a Spanish Rose type, comb in hair and shawl around her shoulders, but is known by laughers in the street as Old Madrid. Her inamorata is Mr Gibson, a portly man who has made his money in retail. As the novel opens, they are deciding that they can no longer be a couple. They have been in love, and lovers, for a decade – but both decide, unspoken, that people of their disparate stations do not marry. Instead, Mr Gibson must marry a Miss Joyce, solely for business reasons.

They are both rather distraught, but Sharp’s masterstroke is adding a third element: the young girl Martha. She is Dolores’ niece by marriage, orphaned and living with Dolores, and a more convincingly stolid and dispassionate child never existed in fiction. She is not mean or intentionally rude, she is simply completely uninterested in the emotional lives of the adults around her. Where Dolores hopes she will be a shoulder to cry on, or even some sort of go-between, she naively and honestly makes no indication that she misses him at all. Martha adds wonderful comedy to the novel, and Sharp draws her beautifully. Oh, and she’s also something of an artistic genius, unbeknownst to everyone (including herself).

Martha is not the only element of comedy. The narrative is always undermining the characters’ emotional effusions or deceits. When Miss Joyce accepts Mr Gibson’s proposal, with supposed surprise, Sharp adds:

As she moved impulsively to accept his embrace, she impulsively pressed a bell; the maid who brought in the champagne must have been very handy.

That repeated ‘impulsively’ works wonders. It is a very amusing book, and that – as in Cluny Brown, which I failed to finish in time for Margery Sharp Day 2015 – is due chiefly to this way Sharp has as a narrator. The most ordinary events are lent a spin of dry humour, but, vitally, Sharp remains intensely affectionate about her characters – and so does the reader. That is the keynote of the novel, that has various twists and turns and interlacing events: Dolores and Mr Gibson may appear ridiculous to many, but Sharp ably makes it so that the reader, like the characters, sees them instead through the eye of love.

Incidentally… my copy is The Popular Book Club, eventually a subscription book-of-the-month type club, and my copy still had the original brochure tucked in it (at around p.20, suggesting that they didn’t get very far). It features a little bit about the author…

Margery Sharp brochure