Won’t somebody think about the children?

I left it a few days, to see what the final count would be, and Enid Blyton surges ahead of JK Rowling – last time I checked, it was 19 votes to 14, I think. That includes my vote, which went to Enid – without her, I’m not sure I’d be such a big fan of reading.

Congratulations, Ms. Blyton – and now I’m throwing the competition open. We’ve already had recommendations for E. Nesbit, and I’m keen to read more of her books, but now I’d like to know which children’s books mean the most to you. Either growing up, or reading them to your own children and grandchildren. It would especially fun if they’re a bit out of the ordinary. One I always remember is Albert the Dragon by Rosemary Weir, and its various sequels, illustrated by the always-delightful Quentin Blake. I don’t know how old we were when this was read to us, but I’ve always remembered (in vague outline, of course) the friendship between Albert and the dragon. I suppose I should say I remember the feeling the books gave me, because in terms of plot I can only remember something vague about food turning into seaweed… Col? Mum? Dad? Am I remembering correctly?


A few years ago I bought one of the Albert books as a Mothering Sunday present for Mum (of course), and I wonder if it’s still in the house… I might try and investigate when I go home for Christmas.

So, yes, favourite children’s books, please, and why they mean so much to you…

Ladies in Lavender


I spent an enjoyable evening re-watching Ladies in Lavender, a 2004 film starring the indisputably wonderful Dames Judi Dench and Maggie Smith. I first watched this when it came out (of course I did, with those ladies at the helm) and I’ve watched it once or twice since, but never did it captivate me so wholly as tonight. And so I’ve been spurred on to write about it – encouraging you to watch or re-watch it.

The film, the directorial debut of Charles Dance, is based on a 1916 short story by William J. Locke. The setting is moved to the mid-1930s, though, which gives the poignancy which is there in everything which takes place on the brink of war. Ladies in Lavender is set in Cornwall, and the ladies in question are elderly sisters – a widow and a spinster – living together quietly, affectionately, and uneventfully. Until one day, while checking the garden for storm damage, they spot a washed up body on the beach. Upon checking, it turns out that the body is alive – and is an unconscious Polish man, Andrea, who is later discovered to be a very talented violinist. The sisters Ursula (Dench) and Janet (Smith) nurse him back to health, and the film watches the repercussions on all of their lives – especially Ursula’s.

Ladies in Lavender rests upon the extraordinary talents of Judi and Maggie, of course, and well they might. Ursula is a kind, naive, easily distressed old lady who has never experienced the peaks and troughs of life. Janet, a little more world-weary, cares intensely for her sister, but has a no-nonsense view on life. She tries to protect Ursula from getting too involved with Andrea’s recovery, aware of the hurt she will suffer, but is helpless. I can’t begin to describe how these women act as sublimely as they do – if you’ve seen them in anything, you’ll know what I mean. The screenplay (also Dance’s) is so subtle, so sparse – each scene is realised through the inflections in their voices, and their expressions, movements, touches. Alongside this pathos, comedy is provided by Miriam Margolyes as the sisters’ cook Dorcas, who is as perfect as always at defusing well-mannered, softly-spoken scenes with lines in the vein of ‘Nothing I haven’t seen before’…


The term ‘beautifully shot’ always sounds pretentious, but I can think of no other for Ladies in Lavender. Even if the story weren’t touching, the film would be worth watching on mute – some reviews seem to think this was overkill, but I don’t think a film should avoid being beautiful. And this one really is beautiful – both in the dramatic views of the sea and scenery, and detailed domestic shots.

I should mention the other principal players, who are wonderful too – Daniel Bruhl spends quite a lot of the film without dialogue, since the character only gradually learns English, and so must put everything into his body language – and he does it brilliantly. Also, I don’t know if he can play the violin well (it is actually played by Joshua Bell, who also released the soundtrack) but, if not, he acts it extremely convincingly (I was fooled, and I play the violin). And then there is Natascha McElhone, whom I have loved ever since The Truman Show.

This isn’t the sort of film which proves very popular in the mainstream, and nor is it edgy or brittle enough to appeal to the indie market, so it probably isn’t regarded as a classic in many circles. But I think it is the most subtle and beautiful of films, desperately and quietly moving, with extraordinary actors, making mild, everyday characters so important and vital. One I’ll watch many times.

Oh, Mr. Porter…


Rose Macaulay first hoved onto my horizons when I read Nicola Beauman’s wonderful book A Very Great Profession (which I discover, rather to my horror, I’ve never blogged about – it’s essential reading for anyone remotely interested in Persephone books or any interwar domestic novels). On the strength of that, I bought Told By An Idiot in Pershore market, and… I still haven’t read it. This is the story of so many of my books, of course, but Told By An Idiot (like, for some reason, Rosamund Lehmann’s Dusty Answer) has been close to the top of the tbr pile on numerous occasions. It’s come away on holiday with me, been placed by the bed, somehow never quite been read…

And I still haven’t read it – but I have read a Rose Macaulay novel. While researching my middlebrow stuff, Crewe Train by RM was mentioned a lot, especially in an interesting and newish book by Wendy Gan called Women, Privacy, and Modernity in Early Twentieth-Century British Writing. My curiosity piqued, I got hold of the novel and read it, and isn’t it good? I don’t know if I’m last to the party on Rose Macaulay. I had read some of her letters, but that was it, so forgive me if everyone else has read everything she ever wrote. Those whom I’ve asked seem to have been almost universally put off by The Towers of Trebizond…

Crewe Train (1926) takes its name from the popular rhyme:
Oh, Mr. Porter, whatever shall I do?
I want to go to Birmingham, but they’ve sent me on to Crewe!and is about Denham, who has got onto the wrong path in life. Brought up by her clergyman father in Andorra, she has instincts and a lifestyle which are fairly primitive. Or so they seem when her father dies, and she must move to live with relatives in London, the Greshams, who live in high society and all write or publish or at least read books. That sort. In Denham’s view: Books were mostly dull enough, but criticisms of books were quite unreadable. The Greshams all read them, but then they appeared to be so constituted as to be able to read anything. It was nearly a disease with them.Imagine! Denham is mystified by most of their activities, which seem to her to make no sense – the solemn dancing, the table manners, most of all the need to visit each other and hold conversation all the time. She is at a loss to either initiate or join the sorts of conversations that her relatives’ circle expects of her – the only successful topic she lands upon is puddings – and she believes that people should stay in their own home, and not bother each other all the time.

But nothing is simple, of course, and Denham finds herself in love with (thankfully distant) relative Arnold – and they marry. The tidal wave of first love is enough to get them through a lot, but then the differences start to spring up. She is desperate not to live in London, and he can think of nowhere else to live. She never reads anything but maps, he writes stream-of-consciousness novels (one, Lone Jane, is a cruelly funny pastiche of Joyce et al, to which comes the response: “I suppose,” said Denham doubtfully, “Jane did think like that. I suppose she was a little queer in the head.”) Though never openly antagonistic, their marriage becomes a struggle – whose lifestyle and wishes will be sacrificed for the other, or will they reach an unhappy compromise?

If this sounds bleak, then it’s only really bleak for the characters. The author and the reader are mostly having a whale of a time – Rose Macaulay has that affectionate, ironic voice which is so characteristic of the time, able to expose the ridiculous aspects of her characters without making them wholly ridiculous people. She uses the extremes of society to comment wryly on all of it, and uses Denham’s unusual perspective on good manners and protocol for good comic effect. For example, when Denham’s mother-in-law is instructing her on good house-management:

“It’s the only way of getting everything done in order. Monday morning clean the silver, Tuesday the knives, Wednesday, the paint, Thursday, the taps – and so on through the week. No day without something cleaned. And one room thoroughly turned out each day, too – that’s most important.” “Turned out…” Denham repeated it vaguely. “Yes, turned out. The things all taken out of the room and put back again, you know.” What for, Denham silently wondered. The same result would surely be achieved, with less effort, by leaving the things where they were. But the maids would not then have done a morning’s work; that was of course important.All in all, as well as being useful for my research, I found this a really fun novel, and I’ll definitely be reading more. In fact, I like Keeping Up Appearances even more so far, it’s very clever. If you haven’t read any RM yet, do give Crewe Train a go. Of course, it’s not in print… but there are plenty of 1p copies available on Amazon. And, who knows, Rose Macaulay might make a last minute addition to my Best Books of 2009, which I drafted the other day….

Gloves on…

Time for another of our sporadic vote-offs, I think. In the past Jane Eyre has triumphed over Wuthering Heights; Music over Art; Hardy and Dickens came out equal, and… well, I can’t remember the others. But it’s been gripping.

Today we’re taking a step into children’s literature. I’ve noticed that whenever I mention Enid Blyton, I get lots of happy comments – she inspires that sort of nostalgic joy in a lot of us. When JK Rowling’s name is heard, we reveal a slightly guiltier pleasure – perhaps because, for most of us, it’s not a nostalgic issue, not yet.

But today they’re going head to head – please cast your vote for your favoured author:
Enid Blyton vs. JK Rowling.

 

Of course you can also vote for ‘neither of the above’ if you’re feeling very grown up… but I shan’t settle for a ‘both of ’em’ answer – ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to nail your colours to the mast!

Bloomsbury

A couple Bloomsbury Group (Virginia et al, rather than Bloomsbury publishing) things to mention today – one being the CD I got from Our Vicar and Our Vicar’s Wife for Christmas. I think it was my friend Lyn in Australia who first mentioned this to me – thus creating something of a circle, since the CD is released by the British Library. Click this link to buy it (no, no commission for me…) It’s basically lots of clips of Bloomsbury Group people speaking, and those who knew them well. A lot come from a radio broadcast on Virginia Woolf, but it also has previously unreleased recordings, and is a great resource to have in one place. Entertaining and useful – and unique. I don’t know about you, but I rarely have an author’s voice in my head when I’m reading. I certainly wouldn’t be able to read Mrs. Dalloway with Virginia Woolf’s actual, very posh, tones pulsating through my mind – but, nevertheless, it is fascinating to hear what they sound like. Just hearing the voices is so interesting – for the most part, they are also talking about the Bloomsbury Group, which would be captivating in itself.

Some names for you – alongside Virginia, there is everyone you can think of. Here are just a few: Elizabeth Bowen, Vita Sackville-West, EM Forster, Frances Patridge, Leonard Woolf, Harold Nicolson, Bertrand Russell, Vanessa Bell, David Cecil, John Maynard Keynes, David Garnett, Duncan Grant, Clive Bell…. oh, everyone. And then you also get people like Nellie Boxhall and Grace Higgins, servants of people in the Bloomsbury Group – another fascinating angle. Let’s just say that Nellie’s voice would give a lot of people now considered ‘posh’ a run for their money.

One of the people featured whom I haven’t mentioned is Angelica Garnett. I wrote a rather hazy review of Deceived with Kindness a while ago – in fact, it’s on my 50 Books… list, though it’s not my best review (and led to one of the funniest comments I’ve received – I usually don’t publish the mean-spirited ones, but this one was too amusing to ignore). Having loved her autobiography, I was very keen to get hold of The Unspoken Truth, ‘A Quartet of Bloomsbury Stories’ which is coming out in January with Chatto & Windus. I sent them a begging letter, and it is now by my bed. Can’t wait to read this lot – fictional, but apparently heavily based on fact. I must confess I didn’t realise Angelica Garnett was still alive, so I was doubly excited – I’ll let you know what I think around the publication date. But, always important, the cover is beautiful…

Snaps from my holiday album

It’s one of those unusual (possibly unique?) trips where I come back without having bought any books. Perhaps not entirely unexpected, since the ‘Englisch’ section of the one bookshop I entered was less than inspiring – but, even without buying books, I loved my trip to Switzerland!

Thank you for all your reading suggestions, which have been stored away in my mind (and, less vulnerably, my inbox) – it was especially lovely to hear from Lewerentz who is actually in Switzerland – and for Lewerentz’s benefit, I will try to remember where we were in the country… quite near Schaffhausen… I can’t remember the name of the village, but it was that part of the world.

Here are just a few snapshots of the trip…

The view from my bedroom window was rather beautiful.

Lots of beautiful chalet-style houses, but I don’t seem to have taken photos of them – this one isn’t wholly representative, but it is charming.


We spent a day at Rheinfall, Europe’s something-ist waterfall. Widest? Biggest? Shiniest? It was a wet day in many senses.



The highlight of the trip was our day up a mountain, having snowball fights….



Amusingly, my trash talk (or, appositely, ‘sledging’) of “You’ll be going all kinds of down!” was misheard as “You’ll be wearing all kinds of denim!” Which, of course, became the catchphrase of the trip. Here Mel is about to be fitted for a new denim jacket, courtesy of Liz.


All in all, a fantastic holiday – and Switzerland is a rather wonderful country. Plus, all the residents have tasteful Christmas decorations. How do they do this? No inflatable nativity scenes in sight, nor even coloured light bulbs. Lovely. Oh, and we crossed the border into Germany to go to church – so that’s another country I chalk up on my tiny list of countries visited.

Switzerland!

I’m off to Switzerland for the weekend with my housemates – all very exciting – so unless I’m very organised tomorrow, there won’t be anything popping up chez Stuck-in-a-Book for a few days.

I don’t know anything about Swiss literature. Either in Swiss or out of it – since I don’t speak any languages but English, I’d have to rely on translations, but even then my mind draws a blank – any suggestions?

At the moment, just to keep you updated on my reading habits, I’m reading Civilization by Clive Bell (for university work) and Mrs. Tim of the Regiment by DE Stevenson, which I seem to have been reading for months – it’s absolutely fantastic, I just haven’t had opportunity to finish it. Also on the go is Try Anything Twice by Jan Struther (of Mrs. Miniver fame), a collection of articles and essays which is very amusing. Ruth (of Crafty People) gave it to me a couple of years ago. Thanks Ruth, these things work their way to the top of the tbr pile eventually!

Since I’ll be out of the country for a few days, it would be lovely to have a list of suggestions to which to return – so I’d love to hear about anything Swiss (except the Family Robinson) and, failing that, any European novel you think I should read, so long as there’s a translation. Scandinavian is my preference…

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekday Miscellany

Yes, the Weekend Miscellany has been visiting a Great-Aunt for the past few weeks, and obviously it is now not the weekend – nor, in fact, is today’s post going to take the usual form of a book, a blog post, and a link. And that’s because I’ve read so many brilliant blog posts over the past week or so, that I just wanted to share them with you. Some you’ll probably have already seen, but some might be new – and there’s just too much wonderful stuff on the blogosphere for me to ignore it for a moment longer. Without further ado…


1.) Throughout January and February, Claire from Kiss A Cloud, and some of her friends, will be leading a Woolf in Winter readathon. This is for everyone, but primarily those who have been intimidated by old Virginia in the past, and need a helping hand to get started. Full details are here, but I’ll just mention that the books in question are Mrs. Dalloway, To The Lighthouse, Orlando, and The Waves. The Big Four, and the right order to read them in. I still have soft spots for Jacob’s Room and Between the Acts, in fact Jacob’s Room might be my favourite Woolf novel (it is today, at any rate) but you’ll be set in good stead if you read those four.


2.) Lovely Elaine at Random Jottings has been a Richmal Crompton fan for nearly as long as I have – I found Persephone through Richmal Crompton, and Elaine and I have shared our RC collections with each other over the years. We both champion her whenever we can ( I wrote about her back here) and Elaine the other day wrote another post in praise of this neglected author. Here it is. Her work is sometimes a bit variable, but there are many gems amongst her wide output. I’m currently reading The Innermost Room, and plan to re-read Matty and the Dearingroydes soon.


3.) Harriet Devine has an ongoing series on her blog, paintings of women reading. The other day she posted my favourite in the series so far, by a painter I didn’t know – Tavik Frantisek Simon. (Great surname!) I hope she doesn’t mind me reproducing it here… but do go and have a scout through her blog for previous paintings. This one reminds me of the Vanessa Bell painting on the Virago Modern Classics edition of Rebecca West’s Harriet Hume. I can only find tiny pictures of it, and can’t remember the title, but you can see it at Verity’s Virago Venture.


4.) I love a bit of book serendipity, don’t you? Simon Savidge picked up Lady Into Fox by David Garnett because the cover and title intrigued him – he read it, loved it, and then found out that it was in my 50 Books You Must Read! His review is so much better (and longer) than the one I wrote, and his beautiful Hesperus edition is a little bit nicer than my old one, found in a secondhand bookshop. The lady who told me about it was the same lady who introduced me to Miss Hargreaves – I have much for which to be grateful.

5.) And finally… Litlove at Tales From The Reading Room has compiled a list Reasons For Buying Books, which I happen to find rather convincing…

That’s a small selection of my favourite recent blog reading – always such a lot to delight in around the blogs, and perhaps you’ll be inspired to link to your five favourite recent blog posts… let me know if you do.

An Evening With Susan Hill

On Friday Becca (whom you will know as Oxford Reader) and I took a trip to Abingdon, to hear Susan Hill talk about Howards End is on the Landing. Anybody who has even glanced at book blogs over the past month or so will have heard about this non-fiction book, where Susan Hill goes through her bookshelves and reacquaints herself with books long-loved, never read, forgotten, or which have mysteriously appeared from nowhere. Reviews have been at both ends of the spectrum, and most places in between, but I’m a firm enthusiast – it’s still prime candidate for my favourite book of 2009, and I waved my pom-poms for it here.

Susan Hill started off by, as she recognised, preaching to the converted – as regards the book industry. HEiotL makes it clear that Hill has no personal desire for an eReader or similar – and while she doesn’t mind other people having them, she (like all of us) is horrified at the suggestion that books will consequently become obsolete. I’m certain that this won’t happen, the Death of the Book has been predicted more or less since the book was invented, but I do worry that bookshops will have to close, and all transactions will have to take place online. Most of Susan Hill’s audience were not, shall we say, in the first half of their lives – so the responsibility lies with the younger generation! What a great way to persuade myself that I need to buy more books.

At each of the different events where Suan Hill has spoken, she’s apparently chosen different bits to read from Howards End is on the Landing. At our event, she read two extracts which demonstrate the book’s scope in tone – one about Roald Dahl, one about Iris Murdoch. That she has known both these people (and shared a doorstep with TS Eliot) is quite something in itself – and she has turned both acquaintances into very different chapters. Her tales of working with Roald Dahl on judging panels were hilarious; her memories of meeting Iris Murdoch before and during her dementia brought a tear to my eye.

Susan Hill – both in this book and on her blog – isn’t shy of an opinion, like any good Yorkshirewoman. What I’d forgotten, when I went to see her talk, was that this would come with a Yorkshirewoman’s warmth and wit. It was a lovely evening, enhanced by seeing Annabel (aka Gaskella) again, and a completely unexpected bumping-into Margaret (aka Books Please). If you click on those links, it’ll take you to their blog posts about the evening, as they’ve been quicker off the mark than me…

Making the Cat Laugh

Oh dear… I was promising for so long to write about that book, the single woman in the 1990s, and I still haven’t. And now it’s too late for me to remember what I liked about it, but anyway, here it is…

This post has no pretensions to being a proper book review, because it could only fail, given my poor memory and the eclectic. After my not-particularly-favourable experience reading Diane Harpwood’s Tea & Tranquillisers, you’ll be relieved to hear that I had a much better time with Lynne Truss’ Making The Cat Laugh: One Women’s Journal of Single Life on the Margins. My Aunt Jacq gave it to me a couple of years ago, perhaps because of the cat theme, perhaps because she sensed it would be up my street. And this, ladies and gentleman, *is* the sort of book EM Delafield would be writing, were she a single woman living in a city in the 1990s, rather than a married woman in a village in the 1930s.

Here’s a confession – despite being a grammar pedant of the first water, I haven’t read Lynne Truss’ bestseller Eats, Shoots and Leaves. I don’t even own it – I know, you’d have thought that at least a dozen people would have bought it for me over the years, but no. I have, however, read Talk To The Hand by Truss, which my friend Holly gave to me for a birthday present a few years ago, since it was an expression we cordially shared with one another. It’s a look at the rudeness in everyday society – quite diverting, but made me realise how terrifying it would be to be a shop assistant for Truss, since she seems to thrive upon confrontation, and I run from it as much as is humanly possible.

Anyway. Back to the book in question – Making the Cat Laugh was first published in 1995, and consists of columns which had appeared in The Listener, The Times, and Woman’s Journal. That might make them sound a bit scattergun, but since they’re all essentially about Lynne Truss’ life, they all meld pretty well. And her life, throughout, is defined by two things: being single, and having cats. I’m reminded of a line from The Simpsons, when Lisa goes into investigative journalism: “Can a woman with this many cats really be mad?” But Truss is playing up to this image – oh, how she plays up to it. But I suspect there is a kernel of truth in her one-sided conversations with feline housemates, organising her life and living arrangements around them and their peculiarities. As the book continues, it becomes less about her single life and more about her views on life, the universe, and everything middle-class, domestic, and slightly bizarre in it. Supermarkets, paint names, Little Women, using friends in newspaper columns without their permission… they all get the treatment. And many more – and it’s very funny. Nary a whiney note, not a glimpse of a sulk – just good old British self-deprecation and mild indignation.

As an example of her cat-obsessed life, this is the beginning of the final column in the book:

When night falls and she doesn’t come in for her tea, I usually start to worry. So I go outside and call for her (the old story), and then feel helpless when she still doesn’t come. I tell myself that probably she is “eating out tonight” – because I know how easily she insinuates herself into other houses, and then cadges a meal by acting weak and pathetic. At the end of such an evening, she will come home to me in a telltale over-excited state, not really interested in food.

Still, I will say this for her: she always makes sure I’m all right. Out comes the tin-opener, and there’s half a tin of Felix, a handful of Kitty Crunch for my little jaws to work on, even a tub of Sheba if she’s been drinking. But it’s not the food I am worried about. It’s just that I am only properly happy when I know she is safe indoors, curled up asleep on that warm hairy rug of hers, her ears flicking contentedly as she dreams of Jeff Bridges.

She was thirty-one when I got her. Mangy and with a bit of a whiff, but also affectionate. She took time to settle down, and it was clear she had been badly treated in the past, because her mood swings were abrupt and inscrutable – one minute running about like a maniac, the next flaked out in weird angular poses in random places on the carpet. But gradually I earned her trust (and she learnt some basic grooming), and now she has this peculiar habit of rubbing her face against my leg, which is quite pleasant actually, though a bit of a nuisance when you are trying to walk downstairs.

To friends who haven’t got one, I always say, ‘Get one.’ I mean it, no hesitation. Yes, they are selfish. Yes, they moult. Yes, they yowl a bit in the night-time and they make it difficult for you to go on holiday. But they make it up to you in so many ways. For one thing, they can sometimes be persuaded to pose with ribbons around their necks. And for another, they are absolutely fascinating to watch. For example, mind spends hour after hour just staring at a big box in the corner of the living-room, not moving an inch, but silently grinding her teeth and tensing her muscles as if to pounce. I have said it before and I’ll say it again: I am convinced they can see things we can’t see.