My Life in Books – Series Three!

As I mentioned a while ago, I’ve got another series of My Life in Books all ready to go.  This is the third series – the first was March 2011, the second was March 2012, and although I intended to wait until March 2013 for Series Three, I realised that I couldn’t wait that long.  And you all seemed to enjoy before too, so… it seems I now run a spring and an autumn series!

For those who didn’t see previous series (and you can catch up with them here) I copied the idea from the BBC series of the same name – bloggers, in pairs, pick favourite and important books from different stages of their lives.  My twist on it is that these choices were emailed to their co-participant, who then tried to guess what sort of person the blogger was from what they read…

All 14 bloggers I approached said yes, which was lovely – and there are some wonderful suggestions coming up for you this week.  By the end of the week you should have 70 recommendations (well, one Victorian novel did come up a lot.)  I’m going to be away until Wednesday, so hopefully things will all appear neatly and in the right place – if formatting goes awry, it’ll have to wait til then to get fixed…

I’m hoping the bloggers will pop by during the week and reply to your comments – do comment, whether you’ve read the books, or want to – and I’ll hop in to the comment discussions when I’m back.

The first pair will appear on Monday, and it’ll run through to Sunday.  Over to them!

Persephone 100 (or, how I accidentally became part of their postal team)

Happy 100th title, Persephone Books!

I always use this photo when I blog about Persephone…
I’ve lived in three houses since this one!
(but I just like this picture so much…)

It really is an amazing achievement – Persephone have brought 100 neglected books (well, 99 and Flush by Virginia Woolf… teehee) back into print, and many of us have read at least one of their titles over the years.  I have them to thank for my arrival in the blogosphere, actually, albeit rather indirectly.  Here goes my chain of actions, from how-I-discovered-Persephone, to how-I-started-blogging…  Prepare yourself for lots of sentences which start with ‘I’.

I grew up loving Richmal Crompton’s William books.
I stumbled across her novel Family Roundabout in a secondhand bookshop (in an early edition) and thought I’d try it.
I loved it.
I saw a Persephone edition of Family Roundabout in Pershore library. (Incidentally, when I was 16 they turned me down for a Saturday job. I feel like writing to them now and saying that I’ve worked for the BEST LIBRARY IN THE UK [probably] for five years.  Bitter, me?)
I read a review of Family Roundabout on Amazon by one Lyn Baines.
In those days Amazon included reviewers’ email addresses, so I emailed Lyn to enthuse about the book.
She told me about an online book group which discussed Persephone titles.
I joined… This was in early 2004, when I was 18.
About three years later, various people from the group started setting up blogs – including Elaine and Lisa.
I decided to follow suit!  And here we are.  Lots of lovely coincidences led to this blog… and how very different my life would be without it.

But that’s far from the only wonderful gift Persephone Books have inadvertently given me (we’ll get onto the ones they, er, advertently gave me) – what wonderful books!   I’ve read 41 of their 100 titles (or 42 or their 101, if we include the biography of Elizabeth Taylor) – giving me so much delight for the future.  Many of those were read before I started blogging, but if you select ‘Persephone’ from my drop-down publisher menu on the left-hand side, you can read the reviews I’ve put up of Persephone titles.

If you want any suggestions for which to read next – or which to read first, if you’ve never read a Persephone book – ask in the comments, and I’ll do my best to help you out.  Hopefully I know the books well enough to suggest one, so if you tell me what sort of thing you’re after, I might well be able to help… that seems to make more sense than just listing off all my favourites.

Now onto the second part of the title to this post!

I was in the British Library last Thursday, reading the play of Miss Hargreaves – so much fun!  (I had no idea that a copy would be there, since it was never published, but apparently they have all the plays submitted to the Lord Chamberlain for approval – thanks so much Tanya for suggesting I check.)  I finished earlier than I expected, so I wandered over to Lamb’s Conduit Street to say hello to Nicola.  I’d promised to pop in for a cuppa next time I was in the area, you see.  Little did I know that it was envelope-stuffing-day!  Nicola didn’t seem at all surprised to see me, though, and I’d joined half a dozen lovely ladies around a table in the middle of the shop, and started labelling envelopes.  The main sending out of biannuallies is done by a company, but the 4000 international customers are still served by hand – I was stickering surnames ‘C’ and ‘L’, and saw a couple of names I recognised (Cate Lombardo, and Claire from The Captive Reader – hello ladies!)  I had a really lovely afternoon, it was great fun, and Nicola very kindly gave me a copy of the Persephone 2013 Diary and Persephone Book 100 – the Persephone Short Stories.  Thrilled doesn’t even cover it!

I remember once hearing that Persephone might stop after 100 books – thank goodness they aren’t.  I’m really looking forward to the Persephone Lecture in November (are any of you going?) and being in a room of Persephone enthusiasts will be a complete treat.

Oh, final tangent – while in London I had the great joy of having afternoon tea at Miranda‘s flat – all baked by her, and completely delicious – and got to see Donna, Rachel, and Polly too.  Such fun!  The picture shows Polly, me, Rachel, and Miranda (Donna being behind the camera) – and what’s left of the spread!  (Hope it’s ok to post this picture, my friends!)  As Rachel wrote on her blog, it was a reminder of how lucky we are to find fun, lovely people with common bookish interests – I always love these gatherings.  If any bloggers or blog-readers are ever heading to Oxford and fancy a natter in a coffee shop, just give me an email!

Hope you’re having a great week – my cold has almost gone, and I’m reading several great books, so I’m feeling rather cheery at the moment.  Off to read some more!

Great British Bake Off: The Final!

It’s been a while – because I went to London, and came back with a cold (I’m still rather beleaguered with it, but I’m powering through before they remove the episode from iPlayer) – but here I am with the recap of the GBBO final!  I’ve had such fun writing these recaps, and I’m delighted with the good response they’ve had here.  I was a bit worried I’d scare you all away with my snark – but hopefully you can tell that, alongside all that, I love this programme and these bakers.

For the first time, I know the result before writing the recap – but I’ll keep it under my hat until we get to the end, just in case you don’t.  Right… on with the show!

Last week we lost… no, sorry… give me a minute… hmm… someone.  Oh, Danny, yes! (ahem) and we’re left with three – Scottish James, Hyperventilating John, and the bridge between the 70s and today, The Brend.  I’m Team James, and most of you seemed to be as well, judging on last week’s comments.

This is the best shot I could get of all three.
James, sadly, is still in plain blue.
I’m not angry, I’m just disappointed.

We kick off with a retrospective of the previous nine weeks, including all manner of people I’d forgotten existed.  It’s also a reminder of how dearly I loved Sarah-Jane and Cathryn.  The brief snippets of the finalists, in this look-back, suggest that someone in production is keen to give them each catchphrases.  A bit late in the day to try that, but ok.  I missed what John’s was, but James gets “I’m just prepping my cloots”, and The Brend says “The male will get a coxcomb.”  Not really the defining moments of the series, but does show that I’m not the only one who hopes for soundbites every episode.  I just wish The Brend had got “I WANT ABSOLUTE UNIFORMITY.”

We amble through the highs and lows of the three remaining bakers, which is rather more interesting than last week’s “The semi-final is quite close to the final” interview montage – and gives The Brend a chance to start on his self-congratulation.  “I think my track record has to make me a very, very strong contender to win,” he asserts.  Has he never seen a reality show?  This is next to “It’s not called America’s Next Top Friend” in the list of what-not-to-say-if-you-want-to-win.  (Some of you will get that.)

Amusingly, Mel’s voiceover is remarking on John’s ‘modern designs’, while the camera lingers on his gingerbread Colosseum.  Hmm.  Not the most modern, is it?  John then babbles his way through a nightmare he had about the bake-off tent, which seems to revolve around faulty lighting.  Since he’s had a bloody altercation with a food processor, the nightmare seems a little tame in comparison.  Still, we get an Anxious Apron Shot, and that’s got to be worth something.

Haunting.

The Brend has to settle for Anxious Glasses Adjustment, which somehow makes him seem more like a cartoon supervillain than ever.

The Signature Challenge is a pithivier.  Which is a great word to say, and Sue doesn’t stint on the comic potential of sounding-like-she’s-lisping.  I love how she is treating the whole series as though performing a sideshow on a pier, which no pun left under-laboured.  I half expected her to turn up with a Punch and Judy stall this week – perhaps with Mary and Paul’s faces painted whimsically on the dolls?  Oh well, better save something for Series 4.

The VTs this week are visits to the bakers’ homes and families – what a shame Cathryn has left, we could finally have solved the problem of whether or not she lived in a tent on the side of a road.  Scottish James is, Hayley tells me, from Shetland.  Or The Shetlands, maybe.  Well, it’s still Scotland (thank goodness, or I’d have to give him a new innovative nickname) and it’s beautiful.

He encourages everyone to apply next year – and I am seriously considering it.  But then I discover that his girlfriend is called Fenella, and I start to doubt his life advice.  She stares at the camera, and says ‘like’ a lot, but seems nice.  He ends the segment saying ‘Knowledge is Power’, which makes me wonder if The Brend has successfully inveigled him into a Fascist cult.

Meanwhile they’re all making rough puff pastry, which isn’t much of a spectator sport, and the programme seems to realise this.  We scoot past a clip of Mary and Paul dithering by John’s workstation, and we’re swiftly back to My Family And Other Animals segments.

Poor John – his parents don’t seem very supportive.  I did really feel for him, since they all seem to wish he’d hurry up and finish the baking so that he could become a lawyer.

“Baking ain’t gonna keep me in pearls, son!”

His Mum does basically say she’d hoped John would leave early, so that he could do more revision.  Perhaps parents nagging sons to work harder at university is just a touchy subject for me… I did suggest that Our Vicar and Our Vicar’s Wife pay careful attention to this bit! (Only kidding!)

I haven’t told you anything about the pithiviers, have I?  James and John are both making something involving meat, and The Brend is making potato, pepper, and spinach pithivier.  I’m in danger of growing to like him, for his thoughtfulness towards vegetarians, if nothing else.  Sue is astonished by the amount of garlic he is using –

– but The Brend is, as usual, unresponsive to humour and informs her that he knows what he’s doing, thankyouverymuch.  Despite previous home VTs suggesting The Brend lives alone, it turns out he has a partner called Jason, who looks about thirty years younger than him.  Jason comments that baking is a way of connecting with one’s childhood. [Insert joke about The Brend’s age here.  Maybe make reference to dinosaur eggs.]

And The Brend suggests that the best baker will be the one who can keep his emotions in check.  As a properly repressed Briton, I feel like this gives me a fighting chance for a future series.

Just so it doesn’t seem like I’m ignoring the baking process altogether, here’s an irrelevant shot of a pithivier being made.

I can’t get too excited about savoury challenges, I’m afraid.  And is it just me, or is this rather an easy challenge for the final?  Notwithstanding Mel’s dire warnings that, if insufficiently sealed, the pithivier will leak.  This sounds, from her usual tone of doom and gloom, like a tragedy second only to the opening of Pandora’s Box.  Oh, Mel, I’ll miss your absurd attempts to inject drama into proceedings.  As Claire amusingly said in the comments from my recap of a previous episode, without GBBO we’d have “no idea of the many perils involved in baking a biscuit or a simple cake”.

The Brend scores his first Oustandingly Obnoxious point of the episode, when he comments that his presentation is better than James’s.  In this particular case, it definitely is, but it’s still rather an unpleasant thing to say.  Although, thinking about it, the cameraman probably asked him a direct question about it.  Oh, you are sly, BBC2. SLY.

Plus, The Brend’s looks rather as though it were inspired by Little Weed from Bill and Ben, no?

Out come the pithiviers – after another one of those “Hurry up bakers!” bits from Sue that are clearly filmed altogether sometime after the rest of the episode – perhaps explaining their growing insanity over the weeks, as they struggle for something to say.  This time Sue claims that Mel is wandering nakedly through the room, with orange segments.  Sure, why not?  And then comes plinky-plonky music and establishing shots of hazy flowers.

I’m going to miss these.  They’re so pointless, but quite pretty, and there’s always the faint hope that they’ll accidentally include a badger sett or a background shot of David Attenborough stumbling through a thicket. (Did I ever tell you about the time that my friend Lorna and I were in the establishing shots of some programme on Gladstone?)

The Brend is congratulated by Mary on his pithivier’s meticulous appearance; Paul loves its base, and the flavour is also complimented.  And he was right about the garlic, blast him.

John does well too – no soggy bottom in sight, and Mary loves the flavour. “It’s got a good flake,” observes Paul.  Now, does that really save time, compared to “It’s flaky” or “Good flakiness”?  No, Paul, no it does not.  But at this stage in the game, I shouldn’t expect any better.  BAD SPEAK, Paul, poor worditude.

Scottish James doesn’t come through quite so well – Mary speaks of the ‘good flake’, which horrifies me – but there is a soggy bottom.  Paul says that it’s seasoned well – stealing the one and only critique ever offered in Masterchef – and Mary refers to the huge temptation to overfry chicken.  As temptations go, it’s one I find fairly easy to overcome.

SOGGY.
(Check your bingo sheet accordingly.)

In post-judgement interviews, The Brend awards himself ten out of ten.  Chuh.

The Blind Challenge!  Which, it turns out, is called The Technical Challenge.  Sorry for misinforming you about that for weeks.  It also features possibly the best moment – not only of the series, but of our time/space continuum to date.  (There, Peter, physics!)  Sue tells Mary ‘off you trot – actually trot, please’ and (GIVE THIS WOMAN A DAMEHOOD) she does.  A static image cannot contain how wonderful this is.

Anything that follows this (in the programme or in my life) will come as something of an anticlimax, but I am impressed by what they have to make.  Fondant fancies!  My old housemate Hannah, who is an exceptionally good baker, made these once – simply because they were the most difficult thing she could think to make.  I used to love them, and my grandparents often had them, but now I find them rather too sweet and creamy for my merely moderate sweet tooth.  Also, bakers – they cost like £1.50 for six.  It’s not worth it.

I learnt this week that Paul calls Mary ‘Bezza’.

Nobody seems to have much of a clue what they’re doing, and the recipe is even sparser than usual.  John makes that fatal transition from enthusiastic-reality-show-contestant to thinks-they’re-filming-their-own-show.  Do you know how you can tell this moment?  The third person plural wanders in.  “We need to keep this butter cream nice and smooth,” babbles John.  Oh dear.  (Also, he is using an electric mixer to make butter icing, which is absolutely absurd.  I would never use an electric mixer at any stage in baking a cake, unless it involved whipped cream or meringue somehow.  Man up, bakers.)

The Brend says “Cover me, I’m going in” – presumably thinking that he’s back in ‘nam.  Awkward.

And John is listening to his cake again.  The final seems to be turning everyone’s head.

“The sponge TOLD me to burn down the tent.”

The bakers all seem to struggle with cutting 25 pieces of cake from a square sponge.  25 is a square number, people!  John gets fixed on the idea that the fondant fancies must be cubed – and disposes of a lot of his baked sponge.  Hmm.

And then they start adding the fondant around the outside.  I don’t remember them saying what’s in this – is it just icing sugar and water?  And food colouring and flavouring, of course.  Coating the fondant fancies is apparently the trickiest part of the process.  The Brend initially warns against ‘dipping them bodily‘, which seems unnecessarily somatic, but ultimately all three bakers opt for dipping – although ‘dipping’ is rather too delicate a word for the clumsy, messy way in which they fling their hands into the mixture.  John even mouths ‘help’ to the camerman at one point.

Even The Brend is struggling.  I’d have thought Fondant Fancies – being garish and dated – would have been right up his street.  My words alone cannot express his difficulties.  This sorry image sums them up:

Sue leans over The Brend and teases him… he does his best to ignore her.  Plus ça change.  She (brilliantly) observes that it is more Generation Game than French Patisserie.  Next, Mary and Paul will eat as many as they can, blindfolded with their arms tied behind their back, while tapping out Ode on a Grecian Urn in Morse Code with their feet.  (Er, Spin-off Alert!  Who wouldn’t pay to watch that?)

None of the displays look particularly impressive… John doesn’t disappoint with his supply of half-hearted, scarcely relevant platitudes – “What’s done is done and cannot be undone.”  Thanks, John.  Never change.

Mary and Paul literally snigger over them…

Mary is disappointed with all of them.  “I wouldn’t say that this is a very high standard at all, for all of you.”  It’s a little heartbreaking.  She should do drugs awareness videos – nobody would do anything illegal, lest Mary do that slight frown, and pained voice.  Oh – The Brend and John share last place, and James scrapes into first place.

The judges and presenters sit around a table and unite in saying that it’s all level pegging at this point.  And it does genuinely seem to be – rather than the usual in reality competitions, when everyone agrees in forced voices that it could go any way, when it’s entirely obvious who has won.  At this point, my money is still on James.  Sue, incidentally, makes a witticism about James being able to prescribe beta blockers.  Mel is confused, and Mary (how I love her) spells it out in tones best suited for a peculiarly unintelligent reception class: “Because he’s a DOCTOR.”

Showstopper Challenge time!  They’re making chiffon cakes, inspired by notable moments in 2012, to be served at a GBBO Village Fete “complete with limp bunting, and torrential rain.”  I’d never heard of chiffon cakes before (their main characteristic is being fatless), but Mel assures me they are ‘notoriously fickle’ and ‘volatile’.  I predicted sentient cakes weeks ago, and now they’re going to happen!

The Brend is making a colossal tiered cake inspired by family reunions – he has been mending rifts in his family.  He’s going to make it difficult for me to dislike him this week, isn’t he?

John is making a ‘Heaven and Hell’ cake, because his year has gone up and down.  Well, that’s vague.  And there go my hopes that everyone will make three-dimensional busts of the Queen in cake.  JUBILEE YEAR, PEOPLE.

Scottish James, bless him, is making FIVE CAKES, one representing each of the four UK nations, and one representing their unity.  Apparently in a year dominated by discussions of Scotland becoming independent, unity is a key feature…  (This, by the by, reminds me of my final project for my Food Technology GCSE, where I decided to make eight vegan sponges.  Goodness knows why.  Sorry, family.)

“Even though they’ve finished their sponge mix,” warns Mel, “every move the bakers now make can still radically alter their chiffon’s texture.”  That sounds like over-statement to me.  John’s frantic wanderings back and forth are especially worrying, if it is true.  As is the unusual baking equipment he requests – cue-tips.

Why were these even in the baking tent?  Surely there is no shop nearby – not if the aerial establishing shots of Nature Red In Tooth And Claw are to be believed.

TRAGEDY!

Here is James’s cake, in mid-fall… I think it’s Northern Ireland.  Make of that what you will.

Curiously, given the presenters’ desire to over-dramatise the most mundane moments of the baking process, Sue refuses to get animated about this genuine mishap.  She comforts him much in the manner of a mother clapping her hands in joy to avert a toddler from the pain of a scraped knee.

The fete is set up, coconut shies and all (I’ve been to dozens of village fetes in my life, and never seen a coconut shy) and our past contestants give us their tips for the winner.  They’re fairly evenly divided between all three bakers, rendering this segment pointless, but it is rather nice to see them all.  Especially, of course, darling Sarah-Jane and Cathryn.  They plump for John and James respectively, by the way.

Gone, but never forgotten.

Cakes begin to emerge from ovens, decorations begin, and James is (predictably) lagging behind everyone else.  John uses unorthodox methods…

and things seem to be going wrong with James’s Turkish Delight St. George’s Cross…

It look quite plasticky, and apparently James has never made it before.  Oh, James, why?  His first mistake, of course, was making anything Turkish Delight flavoured seeing as it is, as we know, the food of the White Witch.  And disgusting.  In the end it is discarded for a raspberry St. George’s Cross.  What a fun sentence to write.

Mel declares the final baking competition OVER.  John does this:

I still don’t know why.  If I’d seen it for the first time in my poorly state, I’d have assumed that Lemsip had taken control of my senses, leaving me with a cold-induced hallucination.  As it is… nope, no idea.  Are rabbits notorious for finishing baking on time?

And then, dear readers, The Brend breaks my heart.  He has an incredibly moving interview, where he is rendered speechless by emotion, about his life over the past decades.  This is just like when Danny went and made me feel guilty about teasing her… oh, you guys.  Love you really.

Luckily James and John are on hand to give The Brend a hug – which mostly serves to demonstrate how tiny Brendan is.  And how co-ordinated they are with their clothes.  And how much chocolate John got over himself whilst making his chiffon cake.

I like to think they’ll all stay penpals after this.  Or follow each other on Twitter, which I suppose is the 21st Century’s equivalent.

The final judging begins…

John’s Heaven and Hell cake (with ‘Tartarus’ etched on top, believe it or not) is declared stunning by Mary, and (after a worrying pause, where Paul starts scraping the cake with a fork, and I worry that he may have lost his marbles) the judges love the texture and flavour.

I think The Brend’s Family Reunion cake looks rather silly and top-heavy, but the judges like its appearance – and the fact that, for once, it is not over-decorated.  Even-layers, nice-bake, etc. And Paul thinks the sponge is like a cloud.  Maybe I spoke too soon on that losing-marbles thing.

I promised you a picture of Mary’s Pirate Side-of-Mouth Eating, and she did not disappoint.  Love you, Mary.

And finally, Scottish James’s dozens of cakes.

They try the middle one.  Oh dear, Paul thinks it’s too dry.  Mary thinks it’s ‘too cakey’ – although how a cake can be that, I don’t know.  Scotland goes down almost as badly.  Mel chirpily suggests, from the sidelines, that they try Northern Ireland next – but before this becomes a baked tour of Europe, the judges draw their critique to a close.  Everyone seems a bit sad that James has fared quite poorly, not least me.  But at least he’s feeding most of the assembled crowd all by himself.

Mary, Paul, Mel, and Sue assemble to chat about the bakers.  Mary proudly attests that “they are all home bakers – they don’t make scenes, they cope.”  What a wonderfully British compliment!  It makes me, as a home baker myself, feel like I’m part of the D-Day landings, or at least Dad’s Army.

So, who has won?

At this point, my money was on The Brend.  But, although I’ve grown rather to respect him, I still really wanted James or John to win…

Drum roll, please.  Just tap your hands on the desk, for me.  Humour me, please.

And the winner is…

It’s only flippin’ John!

Hurrah!  My friend Ellie and I cheered and clapped when this was announced, somewhat to the bafflement of our friend Grace (who had joined us, but not watched all the previous episodes, or developed our distaste for The Brend.)

Did he deserve to win?  Well, possibly not.  He scraped his way through nearly every episode – The Brend was more consistent, and James was more innovative, but nobody tried harder than John, or wanted to win more.  Bless his wee face!

I shan’t bore you with the ‘Since the Bake Off’ slideshow, which shows that most of the contestants are doing whatever they were doing before it all started, but I will leave you with this fantastic piece of news…

Thanks to everyone who has read my recap posts, and encouraging me to write more – they’ve been great fun, albeit surprisingly time-consuming to put together.  Back to books from now on, but I daresay I’ll be recapping Series Four next year – and, who knows, might even apply to be on it!

Caroline by Cornelius Medvei

Lest you get completely the wrong impression about Mel, who gave me Dewey (and thanks for your lovely comments on that!) and High School Musical: The Book of the Film, I thought I’d better review a really good novel that she lent me recently.  It’s become sort of a stereotype that when Mel gives or lends me books, it takes me years to read them.  Well, last Wednesday she lent me Caroline: A Mystery by Cornelius Medvei (can this be his real name?), and I started it at about 8.30pm while waiting for my train home – and by the end of the night, I’d finished it.

Mel knew I would love it for a couple of reasons – it plays with the fantastic, and it involves a donkey.  Donkeys are my second favourite animal, after cats (obviously) and I was definitely prepared to enjoy a novel where donkey takes central focus.

It actually kicks off with one of those layered narratives beloved of Victorian writers and earlier – the sort of thing we see in Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights etc., of someone telling someone telling someone, all remembering things perfectly, etc.  So Mr. Shaw’s son is relating the story to someone who may or may not have a name.  Sorry, can’t remember.  I’m not entirely sure why Medvei did this, unless it’s to put all sorts of question marks about reliability and integrity into the narrative.  (It’s also a nice excuse to include photographs and scraps, apparently left behind by Mr. Shaw.)  Let’s skip past it onto the story proper.

Mr. Shaw is on holiday with his wife and child, from his job as an insurance broker, when they come across Caroline in a field.  They know she’s called Caroline, because it’s painted on her stable.  Mr. Shaw’s son gives this account of the meeting…

They faced each other across the sagging gate.  He saw a rusty grey, barrel-chested donkey, with pretty ears nine inches long (one cocked, the other drooping to the left), head on one side, flicking her tail to keep the flies away.  I noticed her shaggy coat and the pale whiskers on her upper lip, and wondered how old she might be.  I wasn’t sure how you told a donkey’s age; something to do with their teeth, I thought, but she kept her mouth firmly shut as she champed on a mouthful of grass in a manner that suggested intense concentration mingled with dumb insolence, like a bored teenager with a plug of bubblegum.

And she, fixing my father my her great, dark, limpid eyes – “eyes a man could drown in”, as he later described them – took in the hair thinning at the temples, his nose reddened with sunburn, his stomach bulging slightly over the waistband of his shorts (like all his colleagues, my father always wore shorts on holiday, regardless of the weather; shorts were not allowed in the office).

I suppose this was the moment the whole strange affair began; the moment, so well documented in classical poetry and TV soaps and sugary ballads, when two strangers come face to face; the heart thumps, an overpowering force shakes them, like the wind in the birch trees above the stable – in short, they begin to fall for each other.
One interesting result of Medvei giving the focalisation to Mr. Shaw’s son is that we never really know what Mr. Shaw is thinking, or quite what level of affection he feels for Caroline.  His son describes it as a love affair (er, non-physical of course.  It’s not that kind of book) but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that it isn’t – that Mr. Shaw simply thinks Caroline is incredible.

And it’s hard not to agree.  Mr. Shaw manages to persuade Caroline’s owner – and his own wife – that taking Caroline home with him is a good idea.  Once established in the backyard of their terraced city house, Caroline becomes something of a nuisance to the neighbours with her eeee-orrrring.  (We used to live a few metres away from a field of donkeys (known as the ‘donkey field’, demonstrating an early flair for linguistic manipulation) and, believe me, some donkeys make their presence known.  There was one called Charlie Brown who was LOUD.)  Anyway – Mr. Shaw’s solution to this predicament is somewhat unorthodox.  He decides to take Caroline to his office.

After initial protests, Caroline becomes an integral part of office life.  Eventually, even though Mr. Shaw is only a few months away from retirement, she even takes his place.  It isn’t clear whether the office staff are having a joke at Mr. Shaw’s expense, or whether Caroline somehow does perform adeptly at the job… but these ambiguities aren’t practicable once Caroline begins to play chess…

This is where the potential element of the fantastic comes into play.  It’s possible that delusion is at work, but it seems more likely (within the context of the story) that Caroline can play chess and look after financial clients.  She never speaks or writes, or anything like that – Medvei is much cleverer, by giving her a curious form of communication which centres around the chessboard.

Caroline: A Mystery has the feel of a fable, but without any moral or message.  But with, so the subtitle proclaims, a mystery.  What is it?  Her unusual abilities, or his unusual affections?  Or simply the suddenness of it all, without any connection to Mr. Shaw’s previous life?

As I said before, I read this in a few hours.  It’s short (around 150pp) and definitely a page-turner – but with lingering thoughtfulness, rather than the rush-through-discard-immediately feel of some fast-paced books.  Medvei isn’t particularly a prose stylist – there is no bad writing though, it’s just secondary to the plot and the characters – but he certainly knows how to craft a novel so that the reader rushes through, loving every moment, curious as to what the next page will hold.

I know it’s still early to mention the C-word, but I think this would make a lovely Christmas gift for the animal lover in your life.  If that person happens to be you, then… what are you gonna do??

Others who got Stuck into it:


“This is a lovely little book!” – Jackie, Farm Lane Books


“a small but finely wrought – and very enjoyable – read.” – David, Follow The Thread


“Sheer delight from start to finish, amusing, sad and wonderfully written, with great economy of style.” – Elaine, Random Jottings

Dewey

Everyone likes being given a book, don’t they?  Well, a good book, that is.  Or… or a really, really awful book.  They can be hilarious too.

My best friend Mel (who also inflicted this upon me) knows me pretty well, and thought I’d be amused by Dewey: The True Story of a World Famous Library Cat by Vicki Myron and Bret Witter.   I don’t know if they wrote the memoir together in the first place, or whether Bret is responsible for (wait for it) the ‘wonderful adaptation for younger readers’ that I held in my hand.  That’s right – a simplified abridgment of a book about a cat that lives in a library.  The horrors.  Mel insisted that I review it for your delight and education…

Now, you probably know that I’m a part-time librarian, and it’s no secret that I love cats.  I probably love them more than would be considered sane by most.  But Vicki Myron puts me to shame – and this book is a horrifying warning about what I might become a few years down the line.

Before I go any further, I should say that Vicki is probably a lovely woman, and everything I’m going to write is meant affectionately… and who knows how much sanity was edited out during the abridgment stage?  But brace yourselves.  Things get kinda weird.  And hilarious.  My housemates and I took it in turns to read chapters aloud to each other – pausing for hysterics.

On the face of it, this is rather a touching story.  A kitten is found abandoned in the book chute of a smalltown library, is named Dewey (full name Dewey Read More Books – which only works if you are American and say ‘doo-ee’, not English and say ‘dyu-ee’).  He lives in the library, is adored by Vicki, and (it seems) is able to solve most of the problems of the Western world.

Chapters can generally be divided into two camps: those which relate incidents of no notable interest, and those which relate incidents which couldn’t possibly have happened.

She gets very animated about the Dewey Carry (a special technique for carrying Dewey, which involves… putting him over your shoulder); Dewey’s fussiness with food; the fact that he ran to meet people when they came into the library; his liking for catnip.  Basically, lots of numbingly ordinary things which Vicki identifies as qualities which elevate Dewey to a near-deity.  But a lot of cat owners are like that.  I know I am – Sherpa only has to tilt her head on one side, and I’m cooing and taking photos – and she’s not even my cat.

What gets rather crazier is the incidents which reveal the extent of Vicki’s self-delusion.  She appears quite genuinely to believe that Dewey plays hide-and-seek with her – and explains his inability to hide simply as impatience.  She credits him with intelligence far beyond his species, and a level of undying partisanship for Spencer, Iowa which no cat would ever display.  Call me a cynic, but I can’t imagine Dewey (also known as The Dukester *shudder*) feeling that Iowa was unquestionably superior to Nebraska or Wisconsin.  He might – here’s a thought – have no concept of regional geography at all.

Most curious of all, though, is the connection Vicki believes herself to have with Dewey.  Now, I know that if I had a cat in Oxford, I’d probably craft it a cat-sized mortar board and pretend it was a doctoral candidate.  I’d also probably send out Simon & Mittens (for that would be her name) Christmas Greeting Cards, signed whimsically with a paw print.  But I’d like to think that I would do these things with a touch of irony – or at least realism.  Vicki (in this abridgment) doesn’t seem to… she often talks about the first time she met him, and the ‘special bond’ which was immediately established:

As I took the kitten in my arms, I must admit that I felt a little flutter in my heart.  When the kitten had looked into my eyes, something had happened; we had made a connection.  He was more than just a cat to me.  It had only been a day, but already I couldn’t stand the thought of being without him.
You might be thinking – this lady might be lonely, she needs a friend.  Fair enough.  But she has a teenage daughter!  This poor daughter (I think her name was Joanne, or similar) becomes increasingly neglected as the book goes on.  And Dewey doesn’t even live with Vicki!  He lives in the library!  It never became clear quite why the cat didn’t live at her home (except for, ahem, ‘He belongs to Spencer’.)  One time, in the part I think I laughed at most, Dewey did come to stay with Vicki:

The library closed for three days on Christmas Eve, so Dewey came home with me.  We spent Christmas morning together.  I didn’t give him a present, though. [Simon – ahha, not as crazy as I thought] After a year together, our relationship was well beyond token gifts.  We didn’t have anything to prove. [Simon – whaaaaaaat!??]
Brilliant!  They didn’t exchange gifts because either (a) their relationship had reached a place of mutual understanding and love which transcended commercial interests, or (b) DEWEY WAS A CAT WITH NO COMPREHENSION OF CHRISTMAS.  Oh, lordy, Vicki.

It did get a bit uncomfortable at times.  Cue photo pun.

photo source

I think my favourite moment of crazy, though, came from neither Dewey nor Vicki.  There is a chapter devoted to the fact that Dewey likes eating elastic bands (no topic is considered too trivial to have a chapter devoted to it) and they want to hide them away at night.  Vicki’s colleague Mary has some in a mug – which she insists he cannot access.

“How about an experiment? [says Vicki] You put the mug in the cabinet, we’ll see if he pukes rubber bands in the morning.”

“But this mug has my children’s pictures on it!”

“Good point.”
HOW is that a good point??  Will her children be somehow cursed if photos of them are put in a cabinet?  I don’t even know what she was trying to mean.  But I laughed.  A lot.

I can’t, in all honesty, recommend this book.  It’s either appallingly written, or appallingly abridged, to make Vicki sound like a loon.  Even people like me, who are destined to turn into Vicki (“turn into?” comments everyone who knows me, adroitly) consider her crazyboots.  BUT, if you can find someone who is willing to read it out loud with you, then it’s an absolute joy!

Right.  Sorry if I’ve been too mean today… tongue-in-cheek, remember!  And Mel – happy now?!

Song for a Sunday

Firstly – a few people have been asking about subscribing to Stuck-in-a-Book by email.  It’s not something I do for any blog, and so I don’t really know how it works, but I’ve decided to give it a go!  There’s a box over in the right-hand column, so… give it a go if you fancy it!  I hope it doesn’t stop anybody popping over and commenting, though, as reading everyone’s comments is my favourite part of blogging.

Onto the Sunday Song – The Dixie Chicks and ‘Not Ready To Make Nice’.  It’s a great song, but it also has a rather amusing (but not entirely PC) MadTV spoof, which I’ve included too.  (You do need to know the background to the song, I think… which you can learn here.)

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany

Another Saturday at work for me, but nothing planned for the evening – X Factor or Iris Murdoch?  Hmm.  It should be an easy choice, but I have to admit that I’m finding The Sea, The Sea rather ponderous.  It’s a book group choice, and I do think it’s very good, but it’s not light reading.  And it is long.  You know how I feel about long books.  Over 500 pages of tiny font.  Huh.  I might be shouting at Louis Walsh instead…

Well, now that I’ve got that off my chest, I’ll throw a book, a blog post, and a link your way.

1.) The book – came from Tara Books, an Indian company which produces really beautiful books.  I wrote  a bit about them here, two years ago, and now they’ve sent me another gem.  To celebrate Dickens’ centenary (which has rather got lost in the whole Olympics fever, but let’s remember it now!) they’ve produced a gorgeous copy of Dickens’ Pictures from Italy, illustrated by Livia Signorini.  I think it would make a brilliant Christmas gift (oh, so early, sorry!) for any fan of Dickens in your life.  If that person happens to be you, then… so be it! ;)

2.) The link – was sent to me by my friend Rachel, and is about the language of P.G.Wodehouse.  Fun!

3.) The blog post – is by Karen/Kaggsy – the first person to review Guard Your Daughters after the mad rush for copies which happened when I waxed enthusiastic about it!  Read Kaggsy’s review here, and revisit mine here, if you so wish.  She lucked out with a lovely (if oddly irrelevant to the book) cover for her copy – go have a gander.  (If you have reviewed Guard Your Daughters, on a blog or LibraryThing or whatever, then let me know!  I’m hoping to gather together reviews…)

‘Modern Reviewing’ by H.G. Wells

Now and then I like to share interesting findings with you, so you can reap the benefits of my trips to the library and research for my DPhil.  I thought this brief article by H.G. Wells – published in a magazine called The Adelphi (edited by Katherine Mansfield’s husband John Middleton Murray) in July 1923 – might be of interest.  Not only is it about Lady Into Fox, which a few of you have read or want to read, but it comments on the whole business of reviewing.  And things in the world of reviewing have changed surprisingly little in 90 years!

‘How many people have read Lady Into Fox by David Garnett?  Most of us round and about the professional literary world have done so, but has it got through yet to the large public of intelligent readers beyond?  I very much doubt it.  Our critical reviewing people are cursed by a sort of gentility that makes them mumble the news they have to tell; busy doctors, teachers, business men, and so forth, have not the time to attend to these undertones.  No doubt Lady Into Fox has been praised a good deal in this mumbling, ineffective way.  But has it got through?  In the newspapers we ought to have more news about books and less hasty essay writing by way of reviewing.  A book, bad or good, gets its two or three or four or five inches of “review” in the papers and then no more about it.  You cannot tell from most book reviews whether the book matters in the slightest degree, whether it has any significant freshness in it at all.  The good things are hustled past public attention in a crowd of weary notices, weak blame, weak praise, and vague comment.  Newspapers don’t treat tennis or golf in that fashion.  A new golfer is shouted about.  Why was there no shouting about Stella Benson’s The Poor Man or Gerhardi’s Futility – shouting to reach the suburbs and country towns?  Both these are wonderful books and only quite a few people seem to have heard of them yet. Lady Into Fox is the most amazingly good story I have read for a long time.  I don’t propose to offer criticisms.  I accept a book like this; I don’t criticise it.  I have nothing to say about how it is done, because I think it is perfectly done and could not have been done in any other way.  It is quite a fresh thing.  It is as astonishing and it is as entirely right and consistent as a new creation, a sort of new animal, let us say, suddenly running about in the world.  It is like a small, queer, furry animal I admit, but as alive, as whimsically inevitable as a very healthy kitten.  It shows up most other stories, all these trade stories that fill the booksellers’ shops, for the clockwork beasts they are.’

Great British Bake Off: Semi-Finals!

Drum-roll please, ladies and gents – it’s the semi-finals!

This may seem to have come around rather quickly, since I only started recapping two episodes ago, but hopefully that just means that we’re all still super-excited, and my jokes have yet to wear thin.  I’m definitely in the right mood for a GBBO recap, since on Monday I made gingerbread cake from Mary Berry’s Bakes and Cakes.  I didn’t have the right fat, flour, sugar, or treacle/syrup ratio, and my hopeless oven took 1hr 40 to bake it instead of 50 minutes, but… they are delish!

Last week they made crackers (yawn), chocolate teacakes (why?) and gingerbread structures (astonishing) and my favourite baker, Cathryn, went home.  It was past her bedtime, and the producers were worrying that she’d get sulky.  So we’re left with just four bakers battling it out for the final…

Brendan, a.k.a. The Brend, who is using GBBO to audition as the voice of the Speaking Clock:

At the third stroke, the time… sorry, I mean, “I’m nervous.”

Danny, who is lovely and proficient but, in that mysterious way of some reality contestants, entirely unmemorable.

“Danny who?  Oh, ME!”

John, whose distinguishing characteristic is bleeding a lot, and having wildly different hair in his VTs than he is sporting in the tent.

It was all swoopy before.

Scottish James, who had better be wearing jazzy knitwear this week, no matter what temperature it is, or Edinburgh Woolen Mill will be filing for bankruptcy.

It’s no use looking over there, James, I can see UNPATTERNED BLUE.

I’m totally Team James now (which, following recent episodes, almost guarantees his exit) so, with that in mind… on with the semi-finals!

It’s French Week, which is appropriate given the news that France will be showing their own Great British Bake Off (presumably with some sort of change of name, non?) and inspires this attractive shot of presenters Sue and Mel.  (It feels wrong not to call them ‘Mel and Sue’ – maybe they, like Ant and Dec, should always stand in alphabetical order?)

Uncanny.

The bakers are definitely feeling the pressure, as they tell us in those vague sort of interviews which don’t really achieve anything other than reminding the viewer that it’s the semi-final.  “The stepping stone towards the final,” The Brend confides.  “The final is just one step away” adds John, helpfully.  Scottish James (who is wearing a PLAIN BLUE T-SHIRT, the horrors) says that people seem more ‘withdrawn’.  Lots of people have been withdrawn, James.  That’s how the show works, m’dear.

For the Signature Challenge, they’re making three types of petit-fours (oh, the irony, &c.) – meringue, choux pastry, and so forth – and twelve of each.  Since we’ve not seen lovely Mary Berry and fierce sweetheart Paul Hollywood yet, here they are.  Paul, it seems, is mid-linedance, but we shan’t hold that against him.  For all I know, Mary’s about to launch into a do-si-do.

Petit-fours were originally served as an after-dinner course, Paul tells us, and while Mary simply requires them to be small (I reckon I could do that), Paul stipulates that they be small, exquisite, and perfect.

The Brend is making these delights:

He tells the camera that he is a perfectionist, and impossible to live with.  Yes, I imagine it would be a nightmare to have those clipped tones tell me the time, sponsored by Accurist, every three seconds.  But I’m always impressed when people make pastry swans on this show, and presumably pastry cygnets are the same, writ small.  Yet again, the BBC Colouring-in department has only the least appetizing shade of yellow available – those friands look like Victorian baths filled with melted traffic cones.  (Incidentally, Heston Blumenthal is considering that very recipe for his new show.)

Paul goes up some points in my estimation by asking Brendan whether or not his cygnets will be sat on a blue  buttercream sea, fish and all.  Maybe he’ll go minimalist this week?  The Brend disregards the question altogether, and ploughs on with his description of lime-filled friands.  I love me some limes, so I’m not going to argue with him, although nobody has explained what a friand is.

The other three bakers are making macaroons.  Mel warns, on the voiceover, that one baker is being a bit risky with the traditional recipe.  Without being told, I knew this would be Scottish James.  He has become the tent’s version of James Dean – unpredictable! rebellious! called James! – and, adorably, he smirks guiltily when admitting that he’s making chilli sugar…

He laughs at Paul for not having had chilli, raspberry, and lime together before.  Oh, Scottish James, please win.  Although answering Paul back might not be a longterm strategy… look what happened to Cathryn “Oh, that’s a bit harsh” er, Baker.  I don’t know her surname.

Precision is the order of the day; to make sure each is the same size, the macaroons are being piped out into circles by Danny, John, and Scottish James.  Although there doesn’t seem to be a huge similarity between the drawn circles and the piping in this particular shot:

Danny is making, amongst other things, Orange and White Chocolate Langues de Chat. Literally translating as ‘cats’ tongues’.  In case that wasn’t clear (and an electric whisk is being used throughout Danny’s interview with the judges, so it’s entirely possible that the typical BBC2 audience member can’t hear a word that’s being said) Mary, amazingly, does this:

I love her more each minute!

Danny, perhaps bravely trying reverse psychology, suggests that they are usually ‘hard and disappointing’, and resists all attempts on Mel’s part to get her to adopt a French accent.

We’ve not visited John yet – he’s usually the sage of the group, dispensing wisdom in the form of irrelevant platitudes, but today he settles for promising ‘bejewelled’ madeleines (which gets an ‘ooo’ from Mel and Mary, and stony silence from Paul).  I was hoping for something along the lines of ‘The madeleine makes me contemplate mortality’, but I can wait.  I can wait all day, John.

Brendan’s choux pastry cygnets, if prophetic, don’t bode well for his eventual placing in the Great British Bake Off…

Sue then sidles up, and he offers to let her put one of the cygnet necks into a bun – before immediately transforming into everyone’s strictest teacher, and telling her to watch him do it properly, and that if she acts like a child she’ll be treated like a child.  (Well, maybe he didn’t say that bit.  But the point stands.)

To do him justice, he does declare it perfect afterwards.  Good old The Brend.

While Sue is enjoying herself, it’s up to Voiceover Mel to put on her usual tone of danger and doom, warning that one baker is about to commit a ‘potentially disastrous patisserie faux-pas.’  (I’d eat a patisserie faux-pas right now; sounds delicious.)  Is it Danny, under the watchful eyes of Hollywood and Berry?

At least we now know what Mary would look like with a big blue beard.

No, nothing so interesting.  It is – but of course – Scottish James, doing something even I know you shouldn’t  do – adding water to his melting chocolate.  But apparently he does know what he’s doing – melting them together, then whisking them together over ice to make a mousse.  Impressive, Scottish James, you renegade, you!

This obviously isn’t a chocolate mousse, but it encouraged me.

There are so many different types of cake to get through here, so I’m just going to give you the vaguest of impressions of the judges’ comments.  And, after three recaps, I still haven’t screencapped Mary Berry eating like a pirate.  I’ll save something for the finale.

James gets commended for his flavours and originality, but Paul considers his tarts too big – ‘afternoon tea’ rather than petit-fours.  I reckon I could manage.

Danny’s cats need to see a vet asap, if their tongues look like this, but she gets a mostly positive assessment.  Mary comments on the ‘good bake’, while Paul’s grammar is either improving, or I’m ceasing to notice it.

John’s don’t fare quite so well.  Mary says that his madeleines ‘somehow or other, should have a better appearance’.  In Paul’s less delicate parlance, ‘the look is terrible’.  John begins to look rather folorn.

The Brend has somehow managed to restrict his colour palate to beiges and browns, and gets excellent critiques for all his petit-fours.  Mary thinks she’s in Paris – perhaps angling for a job on the new French series, or perhaps the amount of sugar she’s eaten in the past few weeks has addled her brain?

Paul seems obsessed mostly with the size of everyone’s petit-fours, and I get the feeling that he’d have greeted little cardboard cut-outs with joy, so long as they were the right size and shape.

For the Blind Challenge they all have to make a Fraisiere – which I have never heard of, but which makes Brendan raise his eyebrows in consternation, and thus MUST be difficult.  Or pose no opportunity for bright orange fondant flowers.  I imagine either would chill The Brend to the bone.

The recipe they must all follow is very sparse – the first step is ‘make a genoise sponge’, for instance.  Here is the one which Mary Berry made earlier – I hope she made it herself, anyway, although she calls it ‘scrummy’, which isn’t very modest.  But she’s right, it does look scrummy.

Mel says it’s the ‘little black dress’ of the patisserie world.  It’s that sort of inexplicable nonsense which reminds me that we haven’t had the Here’s Some Facts About Regional Cakes segment, where poor hapless Mel is dragged up to Lancashire to witness the genesis of an Eccles cake, or Sue is forced to sit through an out-of-work actress pretending to be a boisterous 18th century cook.

Oh.  I spoke too soon.

I’m going boldly to ignore the history of someone who made ovens, or something.  Mel and Sue have obviously revolted, as neither of them are present in this segment – various biographers and ‘experts’ are forced to babble, instead, at anonymous cameramen.

I don’t know what they were talking about, but there were nice pictures.

Back in the tent, everything’s a little tense.  They all comment that they’ve never made a ‘creme pat’ quite like this.  Well, folks, I’ve never made a creme pat at all.  Adorably, Mel and Sue gossip at the side (“How’s Danny doing?”  “Danny’s doing well.”  “Oh, good!”) like anxious parents on the side of a school football field.

Was that offside, do you think?”
“I have no idea what that means.”

John especially is struggling, and the way the editing is going, I’d be very surprised if he weren’t on the first train back to whereverhe’sfrom.  Over on the prehistoric table, The Brend is getting along pretty well.  Mel pops over to offer some encouraging words (among which, no joke, is included “Amazeballs”) and he not only completely ignores her, he basically shoves her out the way:

That’s not gonna win you any friends, Brend.

But when they’re all unveiled, it’s actually Danny’s which is looking rather the worse for wear…

…and a few minutes later…

Could John be safe after all?

Overall, I’m pretty impressed – but Paul just says “One or two of them look pretty good.”

The placings, you ask?  In last place, of course, is poor Danny.  Believe it or not, The Brend is third.  It’s very close for first place, but James just pips John to the post.  John, brilliantly, calls James a ‘wily minx’.

This establishing shot is so gratuitous, but… awwww.

And onto the Showstopper Challenge – a choux pastry gateaux!

As usual, I’m flagging in my recap by now (always by the most exciting challenge!) so here are some quotations, before we see the finished results…

“I’m interested in your passionfruit curd.”

“Less is more is my new motto.” (The Brend, no less!)

“Although the gateaux is usually in the shape of a bike-wheel, James is planning to go further.”  (Oh, James.  Never change.)

[Mary] “How are you going to construct it?”  [James] “I… don’t know.”  (Attaboy.)


“What the hell is that?” (Sue’s encouraging words.)

[Insert Yet Another Historical Segment Here.]  But Sue gets a trip to Paris out of it, and a man in green trousers gesticulates at her.

AND she’s not wearing a blazer! 

Before this programme started, I was trying to remember John’s distinctive characteristic – and now I’ve remembered; he has mini-breakdowns every episode.  His choux pastry doesn’t rise very well, and he starts madly wandering back and forth, gibbering, while Mel becomes ever increasingly like a tired single mum with a stroppy teenager, and beseeches him to calm down.  Bless them both, it works.  If Cathryn’s spin-off sitcom never happens (and it still should), then I want Mel and John to have their own guidance counselling segment on morning television – are you listening, TV producers?

Time for the final judging of the episode – once we’ve seen three more rabbits in establishing shots.  It’s like a casting call for Watership Down, here.

The Brend’s actually does look understated, somehow!  ‘Exceptional job on the display’, says Paul, shocked into proper grammar.  No ‘displayingly good!’ or ‘it’s the exceptional’ in sight.  They love the flavour, crust, colour, and everything.  I worry a little for Mary’s teeth when she comments on the ‘crunch’, as they sound like they’re disintegrating.

Danny’s also gets complimented on appearance, but they think it’s gone a bit over the top on the amount of rosewater.  “You were brave to pick rose,” says Paul.  That’s what they said to Jack in Titanic.  Badoomtish.

James’ bike amuses everyone, and declared absolutely lovely by Mary, but Paul had hoped for more volume.

Finally, John‘s is another one which is complimented on its appearance – they have all got that in the bag this week – and they love the passionfruit flavour too…

So, who will go home??  My money right now (some hours after it finished being broadcast, and thus null and void at any bookmakers) is… Danny.

Am I right?

Er, yes.  Star Baker is James, again, and leaving is, indeed, Danny.  A lucky save for John.

“Er, let go now, Danny…”

She gives the sweetest exit interview ever – about how the people in her life have been excited about her success, and that she feels valued.  Now I feel a bit bad for being mean to her… but I love them all, really, even The Brend.  Honest.

Next Tuesday – the final!  And an all-male final, at that.  I am man, hear me whisk!

My predictions are Third: John, Second: The Brend, First: Scottish James.  What do you reckon?

See you then!