Changing titles

Reading Boel Westin’s biography of Tove Jansson, I’m struck by the significance (and flexibility) of titles – especially for a much-translated author.  It’s interesting to see how Jansson’s choices of titles were changed by her publishers, and then changed again for reprints and translations and the like.  It’s a bit haphazard, and sometimes misleading… in Jansson’s case it seems to be quite a lot of the publishers being keen to get ‘Moomin’ somewhere in the title. Understandable.

I love publishers – not just the one I work for at the moment! – but there have been a few name-changing culprits along the years.  Here are some of the examples I’ve come across; I’d love to know ones you’ve heard about…

Agatha Christie’s American publishers had a bit of a field day I think.  We’re not talking the necessary retitling to And Then There Were None, but retitling where they want to make the theme more prominent… so Hickory Dickory Dock became the oh-so-subtle Hickory Dickory Death.  I love that…

Whoever reprinted Noel Streatfeild’s children’s books was really keen to capitalise on the success of Ballet Shoes. I was reading her Wikipedia page the other day, and saw that The Circus is Coming became Circus Shoes; Curtain Up became Theater Shoes; Party Frock became Party Shoes, The Painted Garden became Movie Shoes, The Bell Family became Family Shoes (ugh); Wintle’s Wonders became Dancing Shoes; Apple Bough became Traveling Shoes.  Even White Boots wasn’t considered on-message enough, and became Skating Shoes.

The one that makes me crossest… E.M. Delafield’s Straw Without Bricks: I Visit Soviet Russia hasn’t appeared under that title for a while… Someone decided at some point that it would be a good idea to call it The Provincial Lady in Russia, which is incredibly misleading because (1) it doesn’t feature the Provincial Lady, and (2) it’s a very different sort of book.  It’s quite funny, but it’s not a comic book – it’s not even a fictional one.  Tut tut, somebody, tut tut.

Over to you, as usual!  Come across any retitling horrors?

Patricia Brent, Spinster – Herbert Jenkins

Although I love all the books on my 50 Books You Must Read list, I freely admit that some are better than others, as regards literary merit.  Some are simply on there because they are incredibly fun and a delight to read – and Herbert Jenkins’ 1918 novel Patricia Brent, Spinster is among that number.

One of the things I love most about literary discussion online – be it on blogs or email groups or whatever – is that occasionally an unlikely novel will take centre stage.  As I read in a sage review somewhere (I forget where), somebody in the blogosphere always seems to be discovering Barbara Comyns.  Ditto with Shirley Jackson, and similar unexpected enthusiasms have been launched for books like Saki’s The Unbearable Bassington, Diana Tutton’s Guard Your Daughters, and (of course) Miss Hargreaves by Frank Baker. I don’t remember quite where I first heard of Patricia Brent, Spinster, but I do know that last year lots of people in my Yahoo group were reading it, and that Thomas compared it to Miss Hargreaves. So it was one of them.  Right, let’s get onto the book itself, shall we?

Although officially I disapprove of lying, I love it when characters lie in books and TV shows – especially when they do it badly, or it leads to all sorts of unintended consequences.  It’s such a great device, perhaps because, rather than dealing with an enemy or antagonist, the victim has caused their own chaos – and thus must steer things back onto the right path.  It’s the starting point of Miss Hargreaves, and it is the starting point of Patricia Brent, Spinster.

I had assumed that Patricia Brent would be in her dotage – such are the connotations of ‘spinster’ – but in actual fact she is only in her early 20s.  Thus she is rather outraged when she overhears the older residents of her boarding-house talk pityingly about her being 27 and alone.  As Jenkins writes later in the novel:

A book could be written on the boarding-house mind, I think.  It moves in a vicious circle.  If someone would only break out and give the poor dears something to talk about.
Well, this is precisely what Patricia does.  Without giving it much thought, beyond the triumph of the moment, she announces to the assembled ladies and gents that she is off for dinner with her fiancée.  Her plan is simple – she will take a taxi to a fancy restaurant, eat alone, and return having scored a point.  Of course, she couldn’t have predicted that two of the women would find out where she would be eating, and follow her there…

Unable to admit to the lie, Patricia takes a different step – one which severs any attachment the novel might have had to real life – and plonks herself down at the table of a man eating alone, whispering to him to play along.  Rather than look startled or call the manager (as you or I might do), he is game – and they have rather a fun evening.

Peter Bowen is the man in question, an officer and a gentleman (or something like that), and – would you believe it? – he falls in love with her.  The rest of Patricia Brent, Spinster follows her reluctant realisation that she loves him too, and… well, you can probably guess everything that happens.

Not a moment of it is plausible from beginning to end – and, because it is consistently absurd, it is a total delight.  A likely incident would have ruined the whole thing, just as a moment of pathos deflates a farce.  Nobody seems to speak or behave as anybody outside a novel would, but Jenkins has created a masterpiece, in his own way.

You might not expect to love something of this ilk, but I defy you not to be charmed by it.  Along the way we meet Patricia’s aunt, her oft-stated ‘sole surviving relative’, who is every bit as interfering as you’d hope.  Bowen has a kind, wise, witty sister of the sort which cheerfully cluttered up the Edwardian era; Patricia’s political employer (she is a secretary) has a simple-but-honest father.  Nothing here is too original, but all is wonderful – and the writing is just as fun.  This sort of thing:

Mr. Cordal grunted, which may have meant anything, but in all probability meant nothing.
Oh, I loved it.  It’s a breath of fresh air, and as abundantly silly and heart-warming as you could possibly desire.  There are quite a few secondhand copies available (I got mine, with its bizarre dustjacket, for £1 in Felixstowe) but it’s also free on Kindle.  I’m not the first to cry the joys of Patricia et al, but I am among its most vociferous supporters.

A surprise on the shelf

Do you ever just go and look along your bookshelves, reminding yourself of the exciting and interesting books you’ve been meaning to read?  It generally fills me half with joy that they’re there, and despair that I don’t have time to read them immediately.  But it’s also fun to pull things off the shelf, re-read the blurb, remember where you bought, ponder on how good they might end up being…

Today I did that with an author I’ve intended to read more of for ages – Janet Frame. I read a collection of her short stories four years ago, and have bought a fair few over the years.  One of the most intriguing was The Adaptable Man, with this blurb:

Electricity is coming to Little Burgelstatham, cottages are being modernised and the Overspill from London is starting to encroach on the village.  While some would rather live in the past, Muriel Baldry welcomes the coming of electricity, as she can now hang her Venini Chandelier and organise a dinner party to celebrate it.  But does adapting to the twentieth century demand darker deeds?

This is a vividly portrayed and poetic novel with a beautifully balanced sense of the ridiculous.
That sounds wonderfully up my street – odd and quirky, but still domestic and parochial.  I moved it to my ‘must read soonish’ pile. In fact, I think I’ll read it for Kim’s ANZ Reading Week (extended to include New Zealand this year.)  And then I spotted this…

Well, that was a nice surprise!

Best bookshops

I haven’t been on a good bookshop trawl for months.  There’s very little I love more in life than discovering a secondhand bookshop I’ve not been to before, and falling joyfully upon its shelves.  If the books happen to be reasonably priced and plentiful, then my joy is complete.  This was how I felt in bookshop after bookshop in the US, but I don’t think I’ve been to any since then.  Shameful.

So I’m probably going to treat myself with a day out to one before too long.  And I wondered if you had any recommendations – preferably for bookshops in towns which are near enough to Oxford to permit a day trip there and back.  On a trainline.

Yes, very picky, I know.

If they’re in London, that’s ok – but I’d prefer them to be in the countryside, or vaguely countrysidish.

Over to you!

(If you don’t live in the UK, please feel free to tell me about your favourite bookshops… but try not to make them sound too appealing.)

Slightly Famous People’s Foxes

It’s no secret that I’m a big fan of the Slightly Foxed Editions – I’m always so charmed and intrigued by the memoirs they publish.  And now, to celebrate the 10th birthday of Slightly Foxed, they have published a fun-sounding book called Slightly Famous People’s Foxes.

It’s a gallery of fox sketches by the great and the good (including Diana Athill, Quentin Blake, Helen Mirren, Michael Palin, Libby Purves, Alexander McCall Smith, and many more – read the full list here) with descriptions introducing them all.  Clicking on that link will take you to a sample, which is more than promising…

Even better, it’s only £5 in the UK (also available internationally), and all profits go to The Children’s Hospital School at Great Ormond Street.  A great-sounding book for a definitely great cause!  And a very happy birthday to the wonderful Slightly Foxed.

Famine or feast

Ten points if you can say where you’ve seen this picture before…

Firstly, I should say – I haven’t written a book and my thesis isn’t being published (not yet, anyway), so those guesses to my cryptic post the other day have made me think it’ll be a bit of an anticlimax when it’s revealed!  Well, it’s different anyway.

Secondly – I’m having a bit of a lucky streak with my reading at the moment.  Some gems I’ll be talking about in a while, including the Tove Jansson biography I mentioned recently.  What an interesting and creative woman!  I’m also loving the reissued Shirley Jackson novels (thanks Penguin) and a novel published in 2014 (gasp) by one of the few modern authors whose work interests me a lot.

Do you find that it’s famine or feast with reading?  Earlier in the year, I had about eight books on the go and wasn’t hugely enjoying any of them – none were bad enough to give up, but none were exciting me.  At the moment, I’m haring to get back to most of the books I’m reading.  Is it a coincidence?  Am I sometimes simply more receptive to the good qualities lurking in books – or does one good book lead to another?

Sometimes I’m asked (by people who read one book at a time) how I manage to read several at once.  Well, I usually want to combine many types of book (and will confess to confusion recently, when reading two novels with introspective teenage girl heroines) – and at the moment I’m definitely feeling the absence of a 1930s domestic novel in the mix.  So I’m going to grab one off the shelf, and add it to the modern novel, the 1950s Shirley Jackson, the biography…

And I think it might be Elizabeth Cambridge’s Susan and Joanna.  I’ll have to see if that fills a gap in A Century of Books…

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany

I’m off to Bristol for the weekend (as mentioned the other day) – but my quiz ability might be hampered by the fact that I’m not feeling very well.  Doh.  (That’s my excuse if I do badly, anyway.)

Here’s your usual (ahem) round-up of book, blog, and link!

1.) The book – I don’t know much about this one, but it arrived through my letterbox and looks interesting… Grace and Mary by Melvyn Bragg, from Sceptre. A quick google tells me that it was actually out in hardback and I missed it completely (or, more likely, read about it and forgot it).  Well, more info here!

2.) The blog – you probably all know and love Thomas of My Porch and The Readers.  Well, he can add a third string to his violin (which is, incidentally, the number of strings my violin has had for three years) with Lucy’s Forever Home.  It documents the transformation of his home (which was, frankly, already sublimely beautiful) – all the planning, reasons behind choices, diagrams, mood boards, and pictures of machinery that you could wish for.  I lived for property programmes during my teens, and still love them now when I’m in at the right time – and this is like watching one about people I know.

3.) The link – a neat segue. Terry’s Fabrics sent me a link to a fun infographic they’d made about homes in classic literature, from Jane Eyre to The Secret Garden.  Enjoy!

In lieu of a review

Dear blog readers,

I haven’t finished a book in a while, and I have run out (for the moment) of the incidental games and suchlike that I wanted to get people involved with – can I say how impressed I am with your titles-with-the-last-letter-missing?  So I was going to leave the blog blank for another day.  Then I remembered that some kind soul (I forget who) said that they enjoyed it when bloggers just gave a quick update about their lives.  So I thought I’d write you a little letter.

I’ve always given you something of a look behind-the-books into my life, but usually only the momentous bits.  Nothing particularly of note has happened to me recently, but I thought I’d write a little post anyway.

There is one thing I want to tell you about – a bookish thing, no less – but the time has not yet come.  It will help explain why I’m going to be a tiny bit quieter on here for the next few weeks, but it will be more than compensated for – and I hope you’ll be excited.  Oh, Simon.  What a tease.

On the one hand, I’ve been very lucky since I submitted my DPhil thesis – apart from holidays in the US and for Christmas, I have worked solidly.  All of my previous bosses in Oxford approached me and asked me to freelance with them (at various departments of the Bodleian, and at OUP), and that was both very flattering and great fun.  I’m still doing it now, working mornings at OUP and afternoons for the Rare Books department of the Bodleian – now on Twitter, incidentally, in the hands of one of my besties, Lucy.

So, that’s all lovely.  On the other hand, I would like to have a permanent full-time job, unsurprisingly… I’ve spent the past three years explaining to folk that, although I was doing a DPhil, I didn’t want to work in academia (which is still the case) and now I’m hunting for jobs in publishing and similar companies.  Well, I haven’t applied for a lot – I’m still being fussy, and only applying for jobs I really want – and I’m waiting to see what happens.  I’ll report back when there is something to report… but I’m confident that there is a lovely team of people out there just waiting for me to join them!  (Truth be told, I wish I could stay with my current lovely OUP team, but sadly there isn’t a permanent role there.)

And what’s on the immediate horizon?  Well, this weekend I’m going to visit Colin – and while I’m there, Our Vicar and Our Vicar’s Wife will be visiting.  Sadly I shan’t get to see Sherpa or the countryside, but the rest of us will be together, and I am never happier than when I am with my family.  I’m excited about the quiz we have lined up…

At the New Year, we decided to write a quiz between us.  We each made up suggestions for two rounds and put them in a hat, and then drew out two rounds – and had to write on those topics.  Throw in a picture round (or similar) a-piece, and we had 12 quiz rounds to have fun with.  Indeed, it was so fun that we’ve decided to do it again.  I put in relatively restrained topics – art (nice and broad) and Virginia Woolf (just because I was so intrigued to see what questions would be written).  It turns out my crazy family isn’t quite so restrained.  Here are the rounds we have been allocated…

Simon – Peru
Simon – woodwork
Colin – Virginia Woolf
Colin – 1953
Dad – art
Dad – goldfish
Mum – knitting
Mum – defenestrations and other unusual exits

It could be an interesting night!  I have gone a bit wackier with my picture round, but I shan’t reveal anything yet, because my family might well read this…

That’ll do for news for now – but soon(ish) I will stop teasing and unveil the exciting bookish thing.  And I might even get around to posting a book review, you never know.

Hope you’re all having lovely weeks.  And, if you’re not, remember that spring is on its way.  I can’t wait.

Take care,
Simon

Bookshopping: a sonnet

We’re not like this, you and me.  But some people in bookshops are…

Bookshopping: a sonnet


Excuse me, if you wouldn’t mind
I’m looking for a certain book.
A famous one – you know the kind –
The sort to own (in case folks look).
The author’s name I can’t advise –
I’m pretty sure that he was male.
I think perhaps it won a prize,
Or featured in your half-price sale?
My favourite blogger thought it fine;
She gave it eight stars out of ten
(She said she would have given nine,
But doesn’t like to flatter men).
You can’t help? Even with such
Description? Well, thanks VERY much.

Titles with the last letter missin

I’ve recently got into Cabin Pressure, the Radio 4 drama set in a tiny airline – my lovely boss Malie has been casually mentioning it for a year, and I capitulated a few weeks ago, and am already halfway through series 3, eking out the remaining episodes.  It’s very funny, and cleverly scripted.

There is a bookish connection.  Because in one of the episodes they try to come up with book titles which are amusing (and still make sense) with the last letter removed.  Their examples include Of Mice and Me, Three Men in a Boa etc.  And of course, I wanted to think of some of my own…

It’s harder than it sounds.  I’ve only come up Five Children and I (E. Nesbit) and Injury Tim (Beryl Bainbridge).  And The Winds of Heave (Monica Dickens), which isn’t very pretty.

Over to you!  Try to think of them without simply scrolling through a list of books, for maximum mental torment.  Let me know your answers in the comment section…