As For Me And My House – Sinclair Ross

Well, I hope you’ll still be having a wander around Shiny New Books, but that won’t (of course) stop me writing reviews here on Stuck-in-a-Book – although they may quieten down a bit when Issue 2 starts to loom!  (Incidentally, we’re keen to get lots of bloggers writing pieces for us – contact me on simondavidthomas[at]yahoo.co.uk, or all of us at info[at]shinynewbooks.co.uk if you’re interested.)

And onto a book that I’ve been reading for about six months – As For Me and My House by Sinclair Ross, kindly given to me by… someone.  I think Thomas at My Porch – certainly he is a huge fan.  Am I?  Hmm.  I don’t know.  This is one of those cases where I know the book is very good… but I didn’t very much enjoy reading it.

As For Me and My House (1941) takes the form of a woman’s diary from provincial Canada – but Diary of a Provincial Lady this is not.  True, Our Vicar and Our Vicar’s Wife are the central characters – Philip Bentley and his (anonymous?) narrator wife – but that’s where the similarities end.  Basically, the narrator’s life is miserable.  The small town is rude and ungrateful for the hard work her husband does.  He, in turn, has lost his faith and wishes he were a painter.  They are poor, their marriage is rocky, and dissatisfaction soaks every word of the novel.

He’s a failure now, a preacher instead of a painter, and every minute of the day he’s mindful of it.  I’m a failure too, a small-town preacher’s wife instead of what I so faithfully set out to be – but I have to stop deliberately like this to remember.  To have him notice me, speak to me as if I really mattered in his life, after twelve years with him that’s all I want or need.  It arranges my world for me, strengthens and quickens it, makes it immune to all worlds.
Well, as you can see, the writing is beautiful.  There is a deep and emotional richness to the way Ross writes.  I’m not sure it benefited from being in the diary format – it would have worked equally well, and probably rather more convincingly, simply as a first person narrative – but he certainly offers a fully-realised voice.  Just as convincing are the husband and (later) sort-of-adopted son, although I wonder if Ross intends us to believe the narrator to be as perceptive as she seems.

Here’s another beautiful, dispiriting passage:

The sand and dust drifts everywhere.  It’s in the food, the bed-clothes, a film on the book you’re reading before you can turn the page.  In the morning it’s half an inch deep on the window sills.  Half an inch again by noon. Half an inch again by evening.  It begins to make an important place for itself in the routine of the day.  I watch the little drifts form.  If at dusting time they’re not quite high enough I’m disappointed, put off the dusting sometimes half an hour to let them grow.  But if the wind has been high and they have outdrifted themselves, then I look at them incredulous, and feel a strange kind of satisfaction, as if such height were an achievement for which credit was coming to me.
That rather aptly describes how it felt reading the novel.  Melancholy piled on melancholy.  It swept through all the pages, in every sentence, almost in every word.  The more I read, the more I felt outdrifted by it.  I don’t demand novels of unswerving cheeriness, but… surely life isn’t as bad as all this?  (“But a man’s tragedy is himself, not the events that overtake him.”)  It was wearying.  Beautiful, but wearying.

Of course, I read As For Me and My House as someone who has lived in a vicarage for many years, and whose father is still a working vicar (and mother a working vicar’s wife).  I am well aware that it isn’t always easy – that some parishioners can be difficult or aggressive or ungrateful.  In this novel it is the purportedly faith-filled whose hypocrisy stands out; in real life, it is just as likely to be the thoughtless atheist who tells you he’d like the church to burn down, or the teenager who thinks the vicar’s sons are fair game to shout abuse at in the street.  But Ross gives only the tiniest mention (in Mrs Bird) of the positivity that comes with the profession.  The strangers who are kind to you as soon as you arrive in a new village, the people who selflessly give up their time to help with kids’ events and so forth.  There is a world of literature bemoaning the claustrophobia of the small town – which needs to be balanced by how really lovely it is when people all know each other, care for each other, and let nobody go lonely.

Part of this seems like I just wish that Ross had written a different book.  But I think I could have really loved this one if there were a bit more balance – something more to alleviate the melancholy and hopelessness.  As it is, I do admire As or Me and My House.  Ross is unarguably a brilliant writer.  One I’d definitely recommend to sturdier souls.  And maybe my soul will be sturdier next time I try this one.

Shirley Jackson – The Sundial, Hangsaman, and The Bird’s Nest

Oh, this has been a difficult bunch of books to keep quiet about.  And I haven’t really managed it, looking back, but I could have been much less restrained.  Now that Shiny New Books is unveiled, I can finally start linking to my Century of Books reviews – and I have to kick off with the Penguin Classics reprints of Shirley Jackson’s novels. (Incidentally, they tick two dates on my Century of Books list.)

Best among them is The Sundial.  If I didn’t already have a Shirley Jackson title in my 50 Books You Must Read list, then this would be on it.  Annoyingly (and these are the sorts of things I keep quiet from Shiny New Books, but can’t hide from you, dear friends) I’d spent a mini fortune on a copy of The Sundial three years ago, back when it was very scarce… and yet hadn’t got around to reading it until the reprints came out.  Oops.

So this is what I’ll do with my links to SNB reviews.  A little bit of intro, and then the first line or two of the review, to hook you in… click on the link to read my review of Hangsaman, The Bird’s Nest, and The Sundial.

“You can more or less divide readers’ familiarity with Shirley Jackson’s works into separate levels”…

Shiny New Books is LIVE!

The four editors (Annabel, Victoria, Harriet, and me) have just had our final Skype conversation, playing around with menus and links to reveal all the pages that lay hidden on the Shiny New Books site, and (enormous drum roll please) SHINY NEW BOOKS IS NOW LIVE!

Please head on over and start to enjoy!  You don’t have to read it all in one go, of course – we’re hoping it’ll be the equivalent of the quarterly review magazine in print – that you dip in now and then over the course of three months (although we will have updates before the next issue in full).

I hate to sound like an overly proud parent, but we really are proud of it.  It’s been such fun putting it together, as well as quite a lot of hard work, but all our discussions about the logo and the site and… everything – they definitely all feel worth it now.

Over the coming weeks I’ll be linking to some of the reviews, particularly the ones I’ve written which qualify for A Century of Books (!) so I hope that’s ok with everyone.  First things first, I’ll mention that there’s a competition in the first issue (on the homepage) which I’d love to enter if I could…

If you wrote for us, or sent us a book which we’ve reviewed, we’ll be in touch as soon as we can be – and we’d love to hear from other bloggers who’d like to write for us (see our Review For Us page).  For now, I’m off to work… and I hope you enjoy it all!

Blood on the Dining-Room Floor by Gertrude Stein

If Swallows and Amazons is a great book to be reading while the brain is a bit confuzzled, then Blood on the Dining-Room Floor (1948) probably isn’t.  But it came to mind the other day when Dorothy Richardson was mentioned – simply because I’d mixed up who wrote it – but by then I’d pulled it off the shelf, and the fab Picasso cover, combined with the book’s brevity, meant I thought I’d give it a whirl.

Every great writer has, I imagine, been called a fraud – and many frauds have been called great writers.  Which is Gertrude Stein?  I haven’t read anything else by her, and the introduction to this edition more or less says that Blood on the Dining-Room Floor wasn’t a success, but I spent the whole time thinking ‘Emperor’s New Clothes’.  But then I thought… there are plenty of people who say that about Virginia Woolf’s fiction, which I think is sublimely brilliant – so it’s just as likely that this novella is brilliant and I simply don’t get it.  Here’s a sample sentence:

A little come they which they can they will they can be married to a man, a young enough man an old man and a young enough man.
Well, sure, Gertrude, why not?  Not all the novella is that obfuscatory, but it’s also far from unique in the narrative.  In theory, I’m not anti experimental writing – but as I get further and further from my undergraduate days, my tolerance for unconventional grammar and deliberately cloaked meaning gets lower and lower.

And what’s it about?  Well, the writer of the blurb optimistically calls Blood on the Dining-Room Floor a detective novel, but since it’s more or less impossible to work out who any of the characters are, up to and including the person whose blood is on the dining-room floor (a more prominent death in the book is the maybe-sleepwalker who fell out a window), then it can only be called a detective novel in the loosest sense conceivable.

An interesting experiment to read, and it’s always possible that my cold-ridden delirium played its part, but… I can’t call myself a Stein fan as of yet.  Anybody read this, or any of Stein’s more famous work?  Could I be yet persuaded?

A Quarter of a Century of Books

Thanks for all your lovely messages yesterday – it now feels mean to make you wait a week before unveiling the Shiny New Books magazine properly, but if you follow us on Twitter we’re giving a few teasers from reviews and features.  Which may or may not be crueller…

You may remember from the last time I did A Century of Books that I gave quarterly updates – and that, by careful planning or complete coincidence, I actually read exactly 25 qualifying books in each quarter.

Well, dear reader, things have gone awry.  I’m doing better than the sidebar counter suggests, but I’ve only read 22.  That’s right, I’m three books down in what should be the easiest part of that year… inauspicious!

Since I’m reading 1914-2013, it’s not so neat to divvy up the decades and see how I’m doing.  But, bear with me… This is how many books I’ve read so far in each span of ten years.

1914-1923: 2
1924-1933: 2
1934-1943: 2
1944-1953: 3
1954-1963: 4
1964-1973: 0
1974-1983: 4
1984-1993: 2
1994-2003: 0
2004-2013: 3

Shiny New Books

At last, dear blog readers, I can announce what I’ve been surreptitiously up to for the past couple of months (and why there have been relatively few blog reviews here during that time) – Shiny New Books!

Let me explain – next Monday a new online quarterly magazine Shiny New Books will launch at www.shinynewbooks.co.uk. It’s a recommendations site, looking at the best books published in each quarter – fiction, non-fiction, and (my section) reprints, as well including author interviews, behind-the-scenes pieces by publishers, and other bonus material.  We’re hoping that you’ll dip in and out of the site throughout each quarter, to see (as our tagline suggests) ‘what to read next and why’.

And who is this ‘we’?  You may have noticed coy mentions of something exciting coming on other blogs – and I can now tell you that Annabel, Victoria, and Harriet are my co-editors. I’m sure you know all their blogs – you can click on their names to take you to them – and I feel very honoured to be working on this alongside them, given their talents and brilliant blogs.  Not to mention how fun it’s all been!

The reviews haven’t only been written by the four of us, of course, although we have been beavering away at them – some of our favourite bloggers have been quietly writing reviews for us (and keeping nice and quiet about it, thanks everyone!) and we’re hoping to have many more on board for next time.  Opportunities to write will come when we launch, of course.

Monday 7 April is when we go live – at the moment there is very little visible on the site, but feel free to go and check it out, or bookmark it ready for launch.  And for now, you can follow us on Twitter, like our Facebook page, and (most importantly) sign up for the newsletter in the box below.  This will have bonus material, and come out more frequently than the quarterly magazine issues.

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

We’re all very excited about this venture – I hope you don’t mind us whetting your appetite with a week still to go before launch, but I will (of course) give another announcement when Shiny New Books is really and truly launched.

Song for a Sunday

A lot of people turn their nose up at singers on reality shows, but you might quite like Sally Barker… she toured with Bob Dylan and the like, but had to quit when her husband died and she had to raise her children.  Well, thank The Voice that she’s back; I’ve rarely heard a singer who can put this much emotion in a song.  She reminds me a bit of Joni Mitchell – appropriately, since she was in a band called the Joni Mitchell Project.

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany

Another busy weekend coming up for me – I really must arrange one where I just lie around reading books – so I’ll leave you with a quick trio!

1.) The blog post – it’s been ages since I read a Richmal Crompton book, and Leadon Hill isn’t one of the 26 I have read (not including the William series), but Claire’s review has whetted my appetite for more.

2.) The link – I watched Twenty-Twelve long after everyone else (the BBC sitcom about a committee preparing for the Olympics), but I’m on board with W1A.  It’s a sort-of sequel, with Hugh Bonneville and Jessica Stevenson reprising their roles, set at the BBC – Bonneville’s character has become ‘Head of Values’. It’s just as brilliantly believable as before, with lots of verbal ticks (tics?) offering the most comedy. Watch here on iPlayer, if you can.

3.) The poll results – a slight change from the usual miscellany! Thank you for so many results; I found it really interesting to see how the different Penelopes fared (and loved the comment from Jill, on the poll, that her favourite was Penelope!)  The results are above – so far, anyway; the poll is still open – and I will report back on The Pumpkin Eater when I’ve finished it.

Some Penelopes…

Thank you for your comments on yesterday’s post, to those of you who did – I always get anxious posting fiction, in a way I don’t at all with reviews, so feedback and encouragement means a lot!

Now, onto something entirely different.  I quite often get my Penelopes in a muddle – Lively, Fitzgerald, and Mortimer – and I don’t think I can be the only one who does.  I’ve read three or four novels by Penelope Fitzgerald, whom I very much like, and I’m currently reading one by Penelope Mortimer (The Pumpkin Eater), so I’m hoping to disentangle them soon.

I thought I’d use this opportunity to experiment with a poll.  Possibly there are better uses of them, but this was a quick and easy way to see how pollcode.com works!

I’m just intrigued to discover how popular the Penelopes are respectively.  Do pop any particular recommendations (or anti-recommendations) in the comments.

Which Penelopes have you read?
Fitzgerald
Lively
Mortimer
None of the above
  
pollcode.com free polls