Shirley Jackson – The Sundial, Hangsaman, and The Bird’s Nest

Oh, this has been a difficult bunch of books to keep quiet about.  And I haven’t really managed it, looking back, but I could have been much less restrained.  Now that Shiny New Books is unveiled, I can finally start linking to my Century of Books reviews – and I have to kick off with the Penguin Classics reprints of Shirley Jackson’s novels. (Incidentally, they tick two dates on my Century of Books list.)

Best among them is The Sundial.  If I didn’t already have a Shirley Jackson title in my 50 Books You Must Read list, then this would be on it.  Annoyingly (and these are the sorts of things I keep quiet from Shiny New Books, but can’t hide from you, dear friends) I’d spent a mini fortune on a copy of The Sundial three years ago, back when it was very scarce… and yet hadn’t got around to reading it until the reprints came out.  Oops.

So this is what I’ll do with my links to SNB reviews.  A little bit of intro, and then the first line or two of the review, to hook you in… click on the link to read my review of Hangsaman, The Bird’s Nest, and The Sundial.

“You can more or less divide readers’ familiarity with Shirley Jackson’s works into separate levels”…

Shiny New Books is LIVE!

The four editors (Annabel, Victoria, Harriet, and me) have just had our final Skype conversation, playing around with menus and links to reveal all the pages that lay hidden on the Shiny New Books site, and (enormous drum roll please) SHINY NEW BOOKS IS NOW LIVE!

Please head on over and start to enjoy!  You don’t have to read it all in one go, of course – we’re hoping it’ll be the equivalent of the quarterly review magazine in print – that you dip in now and then over the course of three months (although we will have updates before the next issue in full).

I hate to sound like an overly proud parent, but we really are proud of it.  It’s been such fun putting it together, as well as quite a lot of hard work, but all our discussions about the logo and the site and… everything – they definitely all feel worth it now.

Over the coming weeks I’ll be linking to some of the reviews, particularly the ones I’ve written which qualify for A Century of Books (!) so I hope that’s ok with everyone.  First things first, I’ll mention that there’s a competition in the first issue (on the homepage) which I’d love to enter if I could…

If you wrote for us, or sent us a book which we’ve reviewed, we’ll be in touch as soon as we can be – and we’d love to hear from other bloggers who’d like to write for us (see our Review For Us page).  For now, I’m off to work… and I hope you enjoy it all!

Blood on the Dining-Room Floor by Gertrude Stein

If Swallows and Amazons is a great book to be reading while the brain is a bit confuzzled, then Blood on the Dining-Room Floor (1948) probably isn’t.  But it came to mind the other day when Dorothy Richardson was mentioned – simply because I’d mixed up who wrote it – but by then I’d pulled it off the shelf, and the fab Picasso cover, combined with the book’s brevity, meant I thought I’d give it a whirl.

Every great writer has, I imagine, been called a fraud – and many frauds have been called great writers.  Which is Gertrude Stein?  I haven’t read anything else by her, and the introduction to this edition more or less says that Blood on the Dining-Room Floor wasn’t a success, but I spent the whole time thinking ‘Emperor’s New Clothes’.  But then I thought… there are plenty of people who say that about Virginia Woolf’s fiction, which I think is sublimely brilliant – so it’s just as likely that this novella is brilliant and I simply don’t get it.  Here’s a sample sentence:

A little come they which they can they will they can be married to a man, a young enough man an old man and a young enough man.
Well, sure, Gertrude, why not?  Not all the novella is that obfuscatory, but it’s also far from unique in the narrative.  In theory, I’m not anti experimental writing – but as I get further and further from my undergraduate days, my tolerance for unconventional grammar and deliberately cloaked meaning gets lower and lower.

And what’s it about?  Well, the writer of the blurb optimistically calls Blood on the Dining-Room Floor a detective novel, but since it’s more or less impossible to work out who any of the characters are, up to and including the person whose blood is on the dining-room floor (a more prominent death in the book is the maybe-sleepwalker who fell out a window), then it can only be called a detective novel in the loosest sense conceivable.

An interesting experiment to read, and it’s always possible that my cold-ridden delirium played its part, but… I can’t call myself a Stein fan as of yet.  Anybody read this, or any of Stein’s more famous work?  Could I be yet persuaded?

A Quarter of a Century of Books

Thanks for all your lovely messages yesterday – it now feels mean to make you wait a week before unveiling the Shiny New Books magazine properly, but if you follow us on Twitter we’re giving a few teasers from reviews and features.  Which may or may not be crueller…

You may remember from the last time I did A Century of Books that I gave quarterly updates – and that, by careful planning or complete coincidence, I actually read exactly 25 qualifying books in each quarter.

Well, dear reader, things have gone awry.  I’m doing better than the sidebar counter suggests, but I’ve only read 22.  That’s right, I’m three books down in what should be the easiest part of that year… inauspicious!

Since I’m reading 1914-2013, it’s not so neat to divvy up the decades and see how I’m doing.  But, bear with me… This is how many books I’ve read so far in each span of ten years.

1914-1923: 2
1924-1933: 2
1934-1943: 2
1944-1953: 3
1954-1963: 4
1964-1973: 0
1974-1983: 4
1984-1993: 2
1994-2003: 0
2004-2013: 3

Shiny New Books

At last, dear blog readers, I can announce what I’ve been surreptitiously up to for the past couple of months (and why there have been relatively few blog reviews here during that time) – Shiny New Books!

Let me explain – next Monday a new online quarterly magazine Shiny New Books will launch at www.shinynewbooks.co.uk. It’s a recommendations site, looking at the best books published in each quarter – fiction, non-fiction, and (my section) reprints, as well including author interviews, behind-the-scenes pieces by publishers, and other bonus material.  We’re hoping that you’ll dip in and out of the site throughout each quarter, to see (as our tagline suggests) ‘what to read next and why’.

And who is this ‘we’?  You may have noticed coy mentions of something exciting coming on other blogs – and I can now tell you that Annabel, Victoria, and Harriet are my co-editors. I’m sure you know all their blogs – you can click on their names to take you to them – and I feel very honoured to be working on this alongside them, given their talents and brilliant blogs.  Not to mention how fun it’s all been!

The reviews haven’t only been written by the four of us, of course, although we have been beavering away at them – some of our favourite bloggers have been quietly writing reviews for us (and keeping nice and quiet about it, thanks everyone!) and we’re hoping to have many more on board for next time.  Opportunities to write will come when we launch, of course.

Monday 7 April is when we go live – at the moment there is very little visible on the site, but feel free to go and check it out, or bookmark it ready for launch.  And for now, you can follow us on Twitter, like our Facebook page, and (most importantly) sign up for the newsletter in the box below.  This will have bonus material, and come out more frequently than the quarterly magazine issues.

#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; }
/* Add your own MailChimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */

We’re all very excited about this venture – I hope you don’t mind us whetting your appetite with a week still to go before launch, but I will (of course) give another announcement when Shiny New Books is really and truly launched.

Song for a Sunday

A lot of people turn their nose up at singers on reality shows, but you might quite like Sally Barker… she toured with Bob Dylan and the like, but had to quit when her husband died and she had to raise her children.  Well, thank The Voice that she’s back; I’ve rarely heard a singer who can put this much emotion in a song.  She reminds me a bit of Joni Mitchell – appropriately, since she was in a band called the Joni Mitchell Project.

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany

Another busy weekend coming up for me – I really must arrange one where I just lie around reading books – so I’ll leave you with a quick trio!

1.) The blog post – it’s been ages since I read a Richmal Crompton book, and Leadon Hill isn’t one of the 26 I have read (not including the William series), but Claire’s review has whetted my appetite for more.

2.) The link – I watched Twenty-Twelve long after everyone else (the BBC sitcom about a committee preparing for the Olympics), but I’m on board with W1A.  It’s a sort-of sequel, with Hugh Bonneville and Jessica Stevenson reprising their roles, set at the BBC – Bonneville’s character has become ‘Head of Values’. It’s just as brilliantly believable as before, with lots of verbal ticks (tics?) offering the most comedy. Watch here on iPlayer, if you can.

3.) The poll results – a slight change from the usual miscellany! Thank you for so many results; I found it really interesting to see how the different Penelopes fared (and loved the comment from Jill, on the poll, that her favourite was Penelope!)  The results are above – so far, anyway; the poll is still open – and I will report back on The Pumpkin Eater when I’ve finished it.

Some Penelopes…

Thank you for your comments on yesterday’s post, to those of you who did – I always get anxious posting fiction, in a way I don’t at all with reviews, so feedback and encouragement means a lot!

Now, onto something entirely different.  I quite often get my Penelopes in a muddle – Lively, Fitzgerald, and Mortimer – and I don’t think I can be the only one who does.  I’ve read three or four novels by Penelope Fitzgerald, whom I very much like, and I’m currently reading one by Penelope Mortimer (The Pumpkin Eater), so I’m hoping to disentangle them soon.

I thought I’d use this opportunity to experiment with a poll.  Possibly there are better uses of them, but this was a quick and easy way to see how pollcode.com works!

I’m just intrigued to discover how popular the Penelopes are respectively.  Do pop any particular recommendations (or anti-recommendations) in the comments.

Which Penelopes have you read?
Fitzgerald
Lively
Mortimer
None of the above
  
pollcode.com free polls 

The Museum (short fiction)

Sometimes the mood takes me to write some fiction… This one, again, is a bit different from the others – I’m enjoying experimenting.  I shan’t say any more about it, although part of me is itching to say more.  Instead… here is ‘The Museum’.
Sylvia Hawthorn often answered the door with something in
her hand and today it was a blue and gold teapot, which had once been a gift
from a friend of her father’s who might have become Prime Minister, if he had
ever successfully stood for election.  Luckily
the teapot was empty, albeit slightly soapy.
“Miss Hawthorn?” said the lady in uniform on the
doorstep.  The uniform was navy and neat,
with a stripe of gold on the pocket, but Sylvia did not recognise it.  A man in the same uniform (a little less
neat) stood behind.  Both of them looked
young, but a lot of people looked young to Sylvia – who was, herself, 78, but
(as people often put it) ‘still living alone’. 
It was that ‘still’ that Sylvia hated to hear.  The word implied that things might, perhaps
should, soon change – that, frankly, some person or persons unknown had slipped
up by letting the situation continue for so long.  The lady in uniform smiled patiently, and
waited for an answer.
“Yes, I’m Miss Hawthorn. 
Can I help you?”
“We’re here for the museum.”
“I beg your pardon?”
“The museum.  We’re
here regarding the museum.  Would you
mind if we stepped in for a moment?”
Sylvia was not used to saying no to people.  Indeed, she was not used to be consulted on
any matter.  Having been brought up to
respect uniforms, whatever they might signify, she stepped back to allow the
lady and the man to walk past her down the hall.
“I think it will do nicely,” said the lady.
“Perhaps the corridor could be widened?” murmured the man.
“Oh, well, of course – the corridor could hardly stay as it
is.  Think of wheelchair access, for one
thing.”
“I’m sorry?” Sylvia said, but they were in the living room
now.  She wished that she had vacuumed,
or at least tidied in there, but she always started her weekly clean in the
kitchen.  It certainly wasn’t tidy in the
living room, she knew; a pile of books were on the sofa, a jigsaw puzzle was
half completed on the coffee table, and there might well be – she blushed to
remember – the remnants of a cup of cocoa on the sideboard.  Still, she couldn’t stand in the hallway all
evening.  She put down the teapot on the
stairs, and followed.
In the living room, the man and the lady were walking slowly
around the coffee table, looking closely at the mess of objects.  Sylvia trotted quickly to the sofa and
started picking up books.
“Excuse me, Miss Hawthorn,” said the lady sharply, “I’m
going to have to ask you not to touch the exhibits.”
The man hurried across the room, and firmly took the books
from Sylvia’s hands. 
Anne of Green Gables,”
he read, “and The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”  The lady produced a tiny notebook from
somewhere within the uniform, and scribbled some notes.
“They’re from a sale at the library,” Sylvia said, the blush
returning to her cheeks – it was never far from them. “I promise I didn’t steal
them.  I paid £1 for each.  The suggested donation was only fifty pence,
but I like to support charity when I can.” 
She paused, wondering what other relevant information she could possibly
provide.  “I don’t recall the exact
charity.  I have a feeling it might have
been something to do with parrots.”
“Just put them back where they ought to be, thank you.  I’m sorry, Miss Hawthorn, the exhibits really must be left as they are.”
“I’m afraid I don’t really understand – ”
“Proper signage will be in place in due course,
obviously.  Now, if you could take us
through to the kitchen…?”
The lady spoke considerably more than her companion, but he
made up for his silence with the level of attention he paid to all of Sylvia’s
possessions, frequently writing things in his own tiny notebook.  It was a little officious, Sylvia thought,
not to say nosey.  If the man who might
have become Prime Minister were there, he’d have known what to do.  He’d been so clever about the situation with
the village hall plumbing, and had once given her a pair of warm suede gloves,
sensible man.  Not many gentlemen would
have thought of that.  Sylvia took the
only course of action she could think of.
“Would either of you like a cup of tea?”
“Oh, certainly.” The lady in uniform nodded to her partner,
whose own uniform, it transpired, held takeaway cups filled with tea.  “Of course, we can’t use the cups and mugs
you have here.”
Sylvia tried not to look offended, which was the certain
method of making her look her most offended. “The crockery was a gift from my
parents.  I believe the mayor has a
similar set.”
“Write that down,” said the lady to her companion. “The
current mayor? Yes? But you understand that we can’t use the exhibits in such a
manner.”
“Goodness, no!” said the man.
“I’m terribly sorry,” said Sylvia, feeling reluctantly that
the time had come to be direct, “I really don’t understand.  Are you from the council?  Is this – ” (an advert she had seen on
television came dimly to her mind) “– is this at all connected with my TV
licence?”
“I thought I’d explained. 
We’re from the museum.  We are
members of the Museum Committee.”
The man in uniform, who was examining the shelf of teacups,
looked over his shoulder and added: “The subcommittee for pre-launch evaluation
and itemisation.”
“But – I really am most terribly sorry – what is this museum?  And what has it to do with my home?”
The lady laughed – quite kindly, it seemed to Sylvia.  She smiled uncertainly in response.  There remained a faint hope that a few words
would make everything clear again.
“Why, the museum of you, of course!  The Sylvia Hawthorn Museum.”
Before Sylvia could respond, the man had beckoned to his
partner.
“A teapot.  A teapot
is missing.”
The lady strode across the room, friendliness lost in a
moment of businesslike concern.  She
flipped through her notebook, frowning.  Sylvia
stared across the room, hoping that standing still and not speaking would
somehow provide a solution to her confusion. 
They muttered to each other for a minute or two, until Sylvia wondered
if they had forgotten about her entirely. 
Eventually the lady addressed her.
“Miss Hawthorn, my colleague cannot find the teapot.  A blue and gold teapot.”
“I’m afraid I – no – no, it’s usually on that shelf.  I don’t know where it is.”
“Miss Hawthorn, this is quite a serious matter.  Any theft will be prosecuted.  That is our policy, however large or small
the item or items taken.”
“But – but it’s mine.  The teapot is mine.  Everything in this house is mine!”  Even in a moment of confrontation, though,
Sylvia was scrupulously honest, and felt compelled to acknowledge an exception:
“There is a library book by my bed.  I
don’t own that.  It isn’t especially
good.  I would describe the
characterisation as lacklustre.”
The man wrote this down quickly, but the lady’s eyes did not
drop from Sylvia’s face.  “I don’t wish
to upset you, Miss Hawthorn, but the museum simply can’t permit exhibits to be
tampered with.”
“I wish you’d explain to me what this museum is.”
“I believe you’re being deliberately difficult, Miss
Hawthorn, and the committee had so hoped that pre-launch evaluation and
itemisation would run smoothly.  We only
have a week until opening, as you know.”
“But I don’t know.
 I really and truly don’t know what
you’re talking about!”
“The Sylvia Hawthorn Museum, of course. I have already made
that quite clear.”
Sylvia stood with her mouth a little open.  They had reached, she realised, what her
father would have called an impasse.
The man shook his head with obvious disappointment. “We can
come back to assess the kitchen later,” he said. “It’s almost three; we’d better make a start
upstairs soon.” He turned back to the shelf.
The stairs!  Sylvia
suddenly remembered where she’d left the teapot.  In amidst the confusion, that seemed to be a
bright light of elucidation.  Perhaps,
somehow, if she clung onto that information, the rest would fall into place.
The lady and the man had now both turned away from her,
apparently giving her up as a lost cause. 
They were counting mugs and cups, ticking them off a list in their
notebooks.  Sylvia watched them for a
moment, and quickly made up her mind.  Suddenly,
hoping they wouldn’t follow, she hurried out of the kitchen.  Her pace increased as she got to the hallway.
They hadn’t
noticed her leave.  She knew what she had to do.  Without pausing to
put on a coat or a hat, without even putting on the gloves that had been a gift
from the friend of her father’s who might have become Prime Minister, she
pulled open the front door, grabbed the teapot from the stairs, and ran, ran as
quickly as she could, away from the door, away from the museum, and away, away into
the fog.