Great British Bake Off: Series Five: Episode Six

Hey everyone – are you ready for a week where maps of Europe are thrown out the window, Mary delivers her most difficult technical challenge to date, and Nancy steals my coveted spot for Best Moment of the Series?  I hope so…

Intro: Mel and Sue enter our screens, agree that an analogy has gone too far when it has reached only the foothills of their usual mountainous punnery, and the bakers stride across the lawn while the cameraman still lurks in the undergrowth. Plus ça change.

I don’t know how much of the introduction will make sense to transatlantic viewers, but it’s an absolute delight to people like me who avidly watch the Eurovision Song Contest. Quick run-down: every country around Europe (and several which have little-to-no claim to be part of Europe) send some singer given to costumes and histrionics off to a big tent in the middle of nowhere, where they caterwaul and strobe-light their way through a song consisting half of ‘la-la-la’ and half of vague encouragements towards world peace. It’s glorious. It’s my second favourite big-tent-in-the-middle-of-nowhere event of the year.

Equally glorious is the way Mel and Sue re-enact the infuriating time-lag and presenter-waffle of the voting section of the Eurovision Song Contest.

Nancy leans against a fence and brags about all the holidays she’s been on; Richard says he’s aiming for mediocrity; Martha babbles about nerves. We’re good to go. And the first challenge is… yeast cakes. I love bread and I love cake, but I can’t help but feel that this combination is a terrible mistake. Still, the rest of Europe apparently live for the things, so let’s see what happens. (Incidentally, this show – like almost everyone I know in the UK – uses the word ‘Europe’ to mean ‘all of Europe except us’.)

Blazer-watch? Nothing exceptional here – but Mel and Sue should maybe have discussed shades of yellow before getting dressed this week.

Paul remains resolutely in line-dance mode.

Paul steals a march on History of Cake by telling us when baking powder was invented – in protest, I don’t listen  – and uses the appetising sentence ‘these cakes have been around an awfully long time, and they’re all embedded right the way throughout Europe’. Mary nabs the first “Not too long or too short in the oven” of the episode, while seemingly perched on a bird table.

Luis isn’t gilding any olives this week, but does have an amazing tin, which gives fancy ridges and the like. Chetna is making a ‘mainly orange-flavoured’ (mainly?) savarin which gets a very sweet Mary Berry Reaction Face:

#adorbs

Mel has a field day with pronouncing ‘savarin’ – rolling the r so much she could be mistaken for a rolling pin – and also with the tin looking like a piles cushion. Never having seen said object, I couldn’t say.

I do, however, want this natty food mixer; it would match my toaster and kettle.

A shade that Argos lovingly describe as ‘bubblegum blue’.

Nancy – who, in this episode, I think has become my favourite – tells us that she is making “what is called a sponge”, which is either astonishingly patronising, or ‘sponge’ is different from what I think it is.

Richard is making a guglhupf (bless you) with lots of fruit and things, and (he emphasises) rum. He knows what Boozehound Bezza is after. But Paul is disgusted to hear that Richard is going to ‘wing’ his decoration; he rephrases to ‘go with his heart’, pointing somewhere in the region of his liver, but saves this when adding that his heart is in his stomach. Quick thinking, Richard. Nice work.

‘Renegade baker, Nancy’ (as she is introduced) is doing a Diana and entirely ignoring the theme of the challenge. Rather than make something from Europe, she’s opted for something Caribbean. Apparently Bez is fine with that, so long as rum is involved.

Sadly those decorations are depicted all too accurately.

I can’t bring myself to talk about the proving dilemmas again. Rise once? Rise twice? Who cares. But I do love Martha’s reasoning for adding margarine to her recipe ‘to make it a bit more cakey’ and less like bread. That’s definitely what I’d do. She’s also in on the soak-it-in-booze tactic (almond liqueur) but with the difference that she can’t actually buy it herself legally. (Maybe she gets her alcohol from… Martha’s Vineyard. Now, where did I leave that klaxon…)

She also confesses to Kate (who appears to be taking a moment to microwave some popcorn) that she doesn’t know what a savarin is.

You and me both, love. This link will tell all.

Kate cheerfully confesses that hers also isn’t European – excellent work, guys! – and, moments after I say that Israel (the country that inspired her bake) is in the Eurovision Song Contest, she uses the same defence. (Azerbaijan Roll, anyone?) She also adds that, having lived in Israel, she didn’t actually like their cakes. What a triumph this is turning out to be.

Incidentally, I’d have loved to see what Norman would do in this challenge. But at least he could have used the defence that the UK is in Europe, and flung a Viccie sponge on the table.

Chetna, as always, is kneeling on the ground and pressing furiously at a timer.

I’d argue that this could be done equally well standing.

There are lots of shots of people pulling out proving drawers, making sauces, and – inexplicably – gasping at nothing quite a lot. And then we turn to Richard talking us through some white gunk he might (but ultimately does not) put on top. I’m more interested in whatever curious activities are going on in the background. Are they casting some sort of spell on the dough?

In all likelihood, no.

I want to talk about how much I enjoyed Mel and Sue’s accents throughout, but have no way of transcribing them. All I will say is that they’re back on top form.

Luis continues to treat GBBO like his own baking show (actually giving good advice, while Nancy – presumably – falls off her stool in the background), Mel continues to utter dire voiceover warnings about baking-caused world disaster, and the cameraman continues to have a curious obsession with shots of footwear.

I guess he has to get his kicks somewhere.
Geddit, KICKS. It’s funny because the word has two meanings.

Luis’ money is on Nancy to win the whole series; “defo” he adds. (Don’t forget that my money is on YOU, Luis. Adam’s money is on Nancy, fans of my office’s sweepstake will be pleased to learn.) Some lovely editing leads us straight to a shot of Nancy’s cake looking rather a mess.

:-(

“Looks more like a Yorkshire pudding,” she says, “It would probably do it a favour if I dropped it on the floor.” If she’d said “throw it in the bin,” she might have won my moment of the series. Still, she has the Cockney Barrowgirl’s sense of perspective, and womanfully carries on – and by ‘carries on’ I, of course, mean ‘douses in alcohol’. And… well, let’s wait and see her decorations.

They all look pretty impressive (except for Chetna’s, which is rather bland) but – although I can take or leave cooked apple – I have to say that Luis’ steals the show, appearance-wise.

“When you chew it there’s no chew to it at all” – this paradox from Paul is, apparently, a compliment.

Mary gets quite waspish over Nancy’s decorations. Let’s have a little look at them. “I don’t think they add anything,” says Mary.

Would that were true.

“Even as I put them on,” says Nancy, “I thought they looked a bit naff.” That presumably means that, in the shop, on the morning of the bake, and at every moment before she put them on, she was under the impression that green tinsel and a fake flamingo would spell ‘classy’ to the casual observer.

Cake: As Time Goes By is just an excuse for Sue to gorge at the Danish Embassy.

CAKE!

“Scandinavia is very popular at the moment,” says Mel, “with ABBA and The Killing.” As Sue points out, ABBA’s heyday is rather behind us – but, more importantly, this sounds like either a tawdry tabloid headline or the title to a lost Enid Blyton mystery.

The technical bake is a Swedish ‘princess cake’. It sounds bizarrely, and deliciously, complicated – creme pat, cream, sponge, jam, marzipan, etc. 26 separate ingredients, apparently. Like the alphabet. “I’ve never heard of it, never seen it, never eaten it,” says Martha – the last of these probably didn’t need saying, unless she’s given to eating anonymous food, blindfolded.

The sample that Mary and Paul have laid out before them doesn’t have the DEFINED LAYERS that they so ardently (and arbitrarily) demand, but it does look delish.

Those layers couldn’t be less defined if they were a word yet to be added to the dictionary.

Paul giggles like a supervillain.

Nancy, taking inspiration from Norman, becomes the jam expert of the tent, and talks about how she makes ‘tons of jam’.

“I make SO MUCH JAM.”

How green should marzipan be? That question, and others, covered in a baking montage.

And Chetters – gasp – decides to start again, because her sponge hasn’t risen enough. From this moment until the end of the challenge she looks frantic and terrified, several stages behind everyone else.

[Note to self: insert swannee-whistle sound effect]

Martha, in a moment unlikely to still any qualms her parents might have about her maths A level results, is entirely stumped at dividing 5 by 3. She then seems uncertain what shape a circle might be.

Nancy: “I didn’t know if I was Arthur or Martha, first thing.”

If you thought that was good, wait for what comes next…

“What did the male judge say?”

They play it like she’s avoiding Paul’s name out of crossness at his critique, but… she clearly had just forgotten it for a bit. I love how unbothered she is by it all. It’s so wonderful.

Also wonderful is:

Wonderful but unsanitary.

Everything is looking pretty impressive all round, until they start piping their chocolate – at which point almost everybody seems to lose any sense of style or precision. And… Chetters finished hers! She does this across the tent to Sue, and it’s adorable.

Mary is fixated on the dome shape and the distinct layers, neither of which would bother me at all. Paul thinks the piped cream around the cakes looks awful on almost all of them, which I can’t see. They’re quite critical considering how difficult the challenge was. Kate comes last, and Nancy comes first. Chetna comes second, even with her rushed effort. How do you think she would react?

Artist’s impression.

Richard’s pencil has SWAPPED EARS. This is NOT a drill. Repeat, this is NOT a drill.

Mel cheerfully enquires whether there is, or is not, a curse for the Star Baker. Paul responds by pointing out that Star Bakers have done quite badly the week after they win – which is obviously what Mel was saying already. Avoiding the question, hmm? Just what a CURSE MASTER might do.

Is it just me, or is the effort to British-theme the table rather cursory?

The showstopper this week is ‘a contemporary version of the Hungarian dobos torte’ – i.e. a cake with more than one tier and an emphasis on sugarwork. I loves me some caramel, and I’m basically salivating throughout the rest of the programme.

Luis is making a structure based on a local landmark – one, I note, that he carefully avoids naming, presumably so that nobody can question the resemblance.

He’s taken the same approach to British-theming, it seems.

Being a graphic designer he has, of course, drawn up plans on paper. Mary Berry Reaction Face says she’s pretty impressed.

Cor.

And, moments later, she’s stunned by Richard saying he’s going to make 20 layers.

Either that or she’s trying to catch one of Chetna’s grapes in her mouth.

And who could have thrown it?

J’ACCUSE!

I hear the words ‘salted caramel’ too often, seeing as I don’t have any in front of me. No fair. Everything sounds entirely amazing.

Mathematician of the Year Martha announces that 24 is ‘a lot’.

Sue feels like nobody has mentioned that Richard is a builder for quite a while, and takes it upon herself. He doesn’t help himself by bringing in modelling clay.

Alex/Kate is making a three-tier cake “because I think two-tier cakes look like hats”. Oh right, she’s mad. (But still great.) As my friend Andrew pointed out, while we were watching it, it looks like Kerplunk.

And, now I look closely, a hat with a cake on top of it.

Mel is her usual helpful self:

Oh good lord, Kate is wearing a sheriff badge. Amazing.

Should those layers be clearly defined? Yes, they should. Who’d have guessed?

Nancy continues her streak of being entirely unflappable by saying that, although her chocolate has gone grainy and wrong, she’ll ‘scrape it off and start again’. During this pronouncement Chetna has been wandering into shot, and it ends with her giving a wonderfully shocked look in our Nance’s direction. She is the Starting Again Queen this week, so it should come as no great surprise.

Also – doesn’t Chetna have her own sink?

Sue makes a ‘more tiers than an English penalty shoot-out’ joke. Topical.

Luis’ caramel skillz are crazy good. I don’t understand how he’s built this and kept everything the same colour – did he make lots of batches of caramel, or build it super quickly, or what? He’s even finished before everyone else. While Chetters is still dipping grapes in sugar (sure, why not?) he starts cleaning up the workspace, cleaning spray and all. What a man.

And… time is up! I want to eat all of them. But first, the bakers must stare at their creations while the cameraman pans around them.

Here are my favourite (and it was the pick of an incredible bunch):

Nancy gets a good critique in general, and calls Paul ‘lovely’.
Richard’s is ‘a bit sad’, but he has got a lot of caramel elements.
Luis’ is praised for appearance, and Mary tries her hand at a pun (“monumental!”) and adds, in Miranda’s-Mum-mode “It’s what I call a showstopper” – but the flavour is lacking.
Kate’s is criticised for not having enough caramel – which is apparently a worse crime than pretending that Israel borders France.
Chetna’s grape construction is praised. To my mind it looks a bit mad, but each to their own. Mary says that ‘everybody will be copying that at home’, showing a sweet. albeit misplaced, optimism.
Martha’s is disappointingly messy considering it was a great idea. Would it have been so hard to flatten out the surfaces? And – shock! horror! – she used a bought mould for her chess pieces. Where was the modelling clay?

The judges and presenters have their repetitive recap backstage. It comes down to taste vs. challenge-adherence… Richard vs. Kate? Only a superfluous and, frankly, extraordinary clip of mooing cows separates us from the announcement of the Star Baker. It’s…

Chetna! Who saw that coming? Nothing in the episode up to this point seemed to be heading this way, but she’s a sweetie, so I’m happy.

Who will go home out of Rich and Kate? Mary and Paul waffle on for hours, recapping the whole episode for anybody who tuned in a little early for the next programme (including Paul saying to Alex/Kate “you never did enough caramel” – a life-indictment), and eventually (eventually) tell us that… neither of them are going home! Absolutely nobody is surprised by this point, but it’s still lovely to keep them both for another week.

Kate takes it in her stride.

Hurrah!

I’m afraid there probably won’t be a recap next week, as I’ll be away – so I’ll see you when I see you!

Hope you’ve enjoyed European week. Au revoir! (And, Helen… which is the ODO update word?)

Desert Island Discs

I expect you all know about Desert Island Discs – it’s a series that has been running on Radio 4 since 1942 (and, astonishingly, has only had four presenters in that time) where a well-known figure picks the eight pieces of music or songs that they would take with them to a desert island. They are also allowed one (chuh! one!) book and one luxury item. These choices are also, of course, a chance for the interviewee (or ‘castaway’) to give the story of their life.

I’ve listened to it on and off all my life. It was only recently that archive recordings were made available online, so I listened to a few older ones – but I hadn’t realised that they could also be downloaded from iTunes, and thus make their way to my iPod. (The ‘download’ link on the website doesn’t seem to work, so iTunes is the way forward… although the website is a good place to narrow down the possibilities.)

Anyway, this is a roundabout way to saying what a delight it has been, over the past few days, to spend my journeys to and from work listening to Desert Island Discs. There are hundreds of recordings available, from many decades. I assume these are available internationally. So far I have enjoyed listening to…

Jenny Agutter
Joan Plowright
Judi Dench
Mary Berry
Dawn French
Penelope Keith
Gemma Jones
Maureen Lipman

You can tell me interest in theatrical actresses, can’t you? I do love to hear or read about the theatre, and another version of Simon would have loved to be on the stage.

But perhaps the best was Sybil Marshall, a novelist whose first novel came out when she was 80. She spoke about what a charmed and lucky life she’d had – and, considering she also spoke about having a stillborn baby and cancer, just goes to show how much is about attitude.

If you’ve somehow missed these (like me) then – there are many, many hours of enjoyment! As for what I’d take myself… I’m afraid I’d have to eschew music and take audiobooks. I like music, but it doesn’t hold a candle to literature in terms of its effect on me.

A Literary Journey Through Wartime Britain – A.C. Ward

Back in April I read A Literary Journey Through Wartime Britain (1943) by A.C. Ward, very kindly given to me by the always wonderful Karen/Kaggsy, but I have only just got around to reading it. I can’t remember where this first came up (maybe in person; before her lovely review anyway) but I was extremely happy to be presented with a copy. What a fascinating little book it is, and so perfect for somebody with an interest in the early 20th century.

A.C. Ward has a special place in my heart because of his book The Nineteen-Twenties (published, I think, in 1930 – so a very immediate retrospective). I was reading it at the beginning of my DPhil, just to get a sense of how somebody contemporary might have characterised the period. Lo and behold, he had a chapter on ‘The Refuge of Form and Fantasy’, where he discussed the vogue for the fantastic in the period. Since I’d already decided to write my thesis on this, it was wonderful confirmation that it had been significant in the 1920s – as well as providing an invaluable quotation from a talk by Sylvia Townsend Warner that doesn’t appear to have been quoted anywhere else. Research mad skillz.

Anyway, in A Literary Journey Through Wartime Britain Ward does exactly that, whether figuratively or not – he takes the reader on a journey through Britain, showing the literary sites that have been saved from bombing, or those that have been irrevocably changed by war. I can only imagine how poignant and moving this would have been in 1943; it is certainly moving enough now.

Plenty of his narration takes place in London, unsurprisingly – it was undoubtedly the area of Britain most physically affected by war – and in between commemorating Keats in Hampstead and Dickens in Doughty Street, he turns his attention to pre-war Bloomsbury (in a passage, incidentally, which would have been very useful in my first chapter):

After the last war ‘Bloomsbury’ became a synonym for intellectualist inbreeding and highbrow snobbery. But it is as difficult to define (or even to find) the pure ‘Bloomsbury’ type as it is to define or isolate ‘Victorianism.’ There is an old Punch joke, ‘”You can always tell a Kensington girl.” “Yes; but you can’t tell her much.”‘ his, if given an intellectualist twist, might be applied to Bloomsbury in the nineteen-twenties. The authors who wrote and/or published their books in Bloomsbury then were not susceptible to instruction. They instructed. The hallmark of ‘Bloomsbury’ was a tart intellectual arrogance; and in their literary style Bloomsbury writers affected a dryness which was intended to have the vitrue of dry champagne, yet the product was, often, sandy on the palate. The Mother Superior of ‘Bloomsbury’ was Virginia Woolf, but, beside her, the rest were mostly novices lacking a vocation. Her one vice was preciosity; her virtues were legion.
I don’t think I’ve ever read a more incisive and concise depiction of the Bloomsbury group.

Along with the text (and I should re-emphasise that he does sweep through other counties, and not just southern ones either) there are two types of illustration – pencil sketches and photographs. The photos are amazing. We see Westminster Abbey with rubble, Milton’s statue knocked off a plinth, Canterbury ruins, etc. A trove of poignant (yes, that word again) images which bring to life a period that even the greatest description inevitably keeps at some distance.

Thanks, Karen, for sending this my way! A unique perspective on wartime Britain that I will really treasure.

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany

Hope you’ve all had a great weekend! There’s still a bit of it left, so there is time for a book, a blog post, and a link… and, you never know, I might even manage to review some books this week. I’m back in the position of reading lots at once, including some chunksters (Sarah Waters, anyone?) so I’ll have to dive into the backlog of unreviewed books. And I will reply to comments soon too, promise…

1.) The link – if you live near Oxford and want to abseil down a church on October 4th in support of Oxford Sexual Abuse and Rape Crisis Centre, then this link will tell you how. If you either don’t live near Oxford or (like me) could never be brought to abseil for anything, the same link will give more info anyway, if you would like to support. Thanks to my friend Sophie for sharing the link.

2.) The blog post – I adored Dodie Smith’s Look Back With Love, the first volume of her four-part autobiography, and bought a couple of the others immediately. I still hadn’t read any more, but Barb at Leaves and Pages has written lovely and glowing reviews of them. All got 10/10. And now I’m knee-deep in Look Back With Mixed Feelings.

3.) The book – I have heard much of Una Silberrad at middlebrow conferences, but not read anything by her yet – so was delighted to receive a copy of The Good Comrade from Victorian Secrets, and will report back in due course. Find out more here

Great British Bake Off: Series Five: Episode Five

Well, the drama kept coming last week, didn’t it? I had endless conversations in the office about the rights and wrongs of bingate, and whether or not we thought Iain would be reinducted in this episode (spoiler: he didn’t). I also got the closest I’m likely to get to Bake Off fame, when Howard quoted me (eeek!) on An Extra Slice. Not by name, sadly, but he mentioned my Alan Bennett comparison and later confirmed on Twitter that I was the reference. Exciting times. (Extra Slice people, if you’re reading, I would definitely come on the show. Just saying. Any time. I’m ready.) (Any time.)

But enough about me – let’s go on to the Bake Off – which I watched at my friend Adam’s house. His Mum made Mary Berry and Paul Hollywood scarecrows for her village, which shows his excellent credentials as a GBBO host. I’m still waiting for the photos ADAM, but hopefully they’ll appear next week.

“All drama; zero gimmicks” say Mel and Sue in their increasingly contentless introduction to the show – and that’s a fair assessment of the show, I think. Even the in-jokes aren’t really gimmicks. I would have preferred it if they’d said “No gimmicks; all gimlet eyes” and panned to Paul’s piercing blues, but we do not live in a utopia. I’m also very intrigued by that ‘private’ sign that seems to be facing the wrong direction, so that people see it as they leave the grounds. Are they trapped?

Stuck in a Book: asking the questions that matter

In this line, the news that Diana has been taken ill and won’t be returning to the competition is delivered in the least sensational manner possible, even if the pan of the bakers arriving is performed, once more, in the midst of some foliage. It’s voyeuristic and unsettling, cameraman. Stop it.

A few of the bakers talk about how they’re going to miss her, and Martha says that Diana is ‘her grandma in the tent’. What about Universal Grandmother Mary Berry??

The judges and presenters line up to announce the first challenge – custard tarts, gladdening the heart of Lionel Hardcastle – and Blazer Watch has never felt more necessary. Mary and Mel have both gone neon,while Sue appears to be recycling last week’s blazer. C’mon, Sue. Give a recapper something to work with. Paul not only continues to forego a suit jacket, he’s also gone cuff crazy this week. As always, he looks ready for a line-dance.

Is Laurence Llewellyn-Bowen well-known enough
internationally to make for a successful reference?

The first reaction to the challenge is, as usual, Chetna being very nervous, and apologising to the cameraman for no obvious reason. Chetters, you’ll be fine, don’t worry!

Paul and Mary waffle about pastry textures in the garden (“If they make holes, the custard will leak out” – do feel free to grab a notebook if you want to jot down these insights) and we see lots of bakers playing with flour and butter. Frankly, it’s not a difficult challenge. But I look forward to seeing them dramatise.

First off we come to Norman, who is making a tarte au citron. He’s obviously of the opinion that making something foreign – and saying actual foreign words – is plenty fancy enough, and he won’t be wanting to show his face in the Aberdeenshire Working Men’s Club for a month of Sundays, thanking you kindly. “I first tried it in France twenty years ago, and had never had anything as exotic as that at home,” he actually says. Is he trolling us? It’s pastry and lemon, Norm. Mary Berry Reaction Face:

Wut?

It’s so simple that Mel actually includes ‘dusted with icing sugar’ in her voiceover description of it.

“…and served on a plate.”

He says that he’ll be stretching himself tomorrow, and so he’s keeping it simple today. Paul seems ok with that (“if you’re stretching, you need to warm up, and this is your warm up”) but his hesitant face says different. Just you wait and see, Paul… #becarefulwhatyouwishfor

Martha isn’t sure about the challenge. She doesn’t like making pastry. “It’s one of those things that you make if you’re a bit older. People like Nancy make pastry a lot.” She could so easily be given the bitch edit, so I admire the BBC for being kind to her – and I still think she’s fab. Having said that, we get a good reaction face from Nancy (which was probably filmed long afterwards):

Watch yourself.

In justice to Martha, we almost immediately hear Nancy saying how much she likes making pastry. And hers sounds amazing, combining three of my favourite flavours – chocolate, coconut, and passion fruit. I might steal this recipe if poss. Some pastry purists don’t like the chocolate version, but I do a mean choc pastry myself, so I’m all for it. And it gives BBC Colouring Pencils Man a chance to break out a different colour. His pastry colour must be running down.

May contain Minotaur.

Montage time, and the same levels of dramatic music that were given to the #bincident are accorded to Luis pulling clingfilm, Norman advising people to chill pastry, and Martha (perhaps eavesdropping) putting her pastry in the fridge. She takes a leaf out of Voice of Doom Mel’s book and says that she could ruin her tart if she chills the pastry for too long or too little time, which is nonsense. These are the low level stakes we know and love from GBBO.

#drama

Alex/Kate is making almond and rosemary pastry for her rhubarb and custard tart, which sounds a bit much to me, but M and P are all over it (and she claims it’s ‘simple’). She, wonderfully, continues to treat every moment as an opportunity for am dram. In this image, you might think, she has just dropped her tart, or had her home repossessed. No, she is simply talking about rhubarb.

“And… scene.”

Luis is making a ‘Tropical Manchester Tart’, presumably named by somebody with the good fortune never to have gone to Manchester (bad Simon). My friend Hannah, with whom I watched, is a card-carrying Northerner, and was Not Happy about the tart being messed with. (Incidentally, my friend Malie also watched, having never seen it before. The appeal took some explaining beforehand, but I think she enjoyed it.)

Richard is poaching figs (I suggested at this juncture that nobody liked figs, but was shouted down by my companions). More importantly – where is the pencil?  It’s in the shot before this, and the shot after, but not here. Guys, what’s happening? We have lost the only consistent element of the known universe.

Is this a Dumbo/feather situ?

More on the pencil later, building stationery fans.

I’m super jealous of everybody’s pastry, and the way they are able to pick it up and line the tins. Lest we forget, here is an early stage of the quiche my friend Lorna and I made last year:

Nailed it.

It is tarts week, of course, and you might have thought that Mel & Sue – five series in – would have exhausted the comic potential of saying ‘tart’ and winking at the camera. How little you know this programme. But this year’s is rather special. Mel and Nancy have a brilliant conversation about looking like tarts, and having tarts’ hairstyles. I love both Mel and Sue, but Mel is the best at forming galpal friendships in the tent.

Also, Nancy’s top has handbags all over it.
Presumably she’ll do you a good price for them.

Martha talks again about not liking making pastry, which fills us with nerves about her security in the competition. Then we see lots of bakers trim their tarts, while Mel intones about the importance of keeping it neat. Any voiceover about neatness and perfectionism can only end in one place – a swannee-whistle and a shot of Norm.

“That’ll do” is something a life mantra, isn’t it?

“A steady hand is vital for pouring the custard,” warns Mel. It really isn’t. It’s quite a large target, isn’t it? And gravity, despite being Iain’s nemesis, lends a helping hand here. And cue montage of pouring. Mel looms over Richard while he carries his tart, making the whole thing more difficult. And then, this:

You can see why he’s grown to be one of my faves, can’t you? At least he didn’t dunk a biccie in it.

Kate does some extremely impressive swirling, while Norm looks at her bewildered by all the fanciness, and then she collapses over the desk – because of course she does. You can just see a glimpse of Norman, and it looks a bit like she’s unsuccessfully trying to hide from him.

“If I can’t see you, you can’t see me.”

But, bless her, she gives Martha a helping hand getting her tart (which closely resembles a tomato quiche) out of its tin.

We see Luis with a stencil, Nancy doing intricate piping, and Norman… dumping a bag of icing sugar on top of his tarte au citron.

Dusted with icing sugar? Really?

During the judging, Paul says Norman’s looks a mess (sad face), and he takes it stoically. Nancy’s looks as amazing as I’d hoped. Chetna is told “I think you could have cooked your rice a bit longer,” which doesn’t strike me as something anybody should say during a custard challenge.

“It’s custard” is one of the helpful comments Paul makes, to Alex/Kate.

Richard describes himself as “a clumsy blad”, and I can’t work out if he’s using some sort of gangland slang, or reverting to ‘lad’ after starting with a naughty word. Or perhaps he’s referring to himself as a promotional flyer or mockup for a product? Either way, Mary gets her flirt on, talking about his steady hand.

“If I were sixty years younger…”

Martha gets her first criticism of the series, really, and – bless her – she’s upset. One of Paul’s criticisms is that “it’s quite tart” which, given his propensity to mix up parts of speech, could be exactly what they should have been doing. “It’s very bread,” and “Not quite cake enough” are, I feel certain, things he has said in the past.

The bakers repeat all the things Paul said, but standing in the garden.

Bride cake was apparently once a thing, and was to be broken over the bride’s head. In case those words mean nothing to you, we have a two-second reconstruction:

And thereby two Equity cards were earned.

The less said about the rest of the Pies Through The Ages the better. We’re back to the tent, and they’re making… mini-pear pies. Poached pears in pastry. C’mon, GBBO. This isn’t a thing. Go home, GBBO, you’re drunk. It started with the proving drawer and it’s getting out of hand. (Was this challenge chosen just so we can hear Norman say ‘poached pears’ a lot? It’s great in a Scottish accent.)

Btw, I live for pastry, but I can take or leave pears, so I can’t get excited about this challenge.

The soundtrack at this point appears to be performed by a double bass and a pair of maracas.

“Something scientific probably happens to it,” says Nancy, of the pastry. Oh, guys, I love everybody in this tent. It’s a really fab group of people, isn’t it?

My boy Luis (win me that £15, Luis!) keeps explaining how things actually work, and why certain actions are being performed, giving Mel and/or Sue very little to do in the voiceovers – other than, of course, warning that slight adjustments in temperature or pear placement will inevitably result in the tent burning to the ground.

1. Does anybody ever sit on those outdoor chairs?
2. It looks like the freezer has a very intricate handle

Richard and Chetna have a discussion about whose pears are on which shelves of the fridge. We can but learn from the mistakes of others, so well done guys.

Norman is no fan of the poaching wine. “Too sweet for me,” he says, with the exact same expression that he had when saying how delicious his dessert was last week.

Horrilightful.

Chetna tests the maxim that watched pears never poach.

Lovely Martha, as usual, is anxious about what everybody else is doing – and revealingly says “I’m doing what isn’t allowed, and looking at other people’s.” Has there been a rule against this all along, brazenly ignored by absolutely everyone?

Including, in fact, Martha in this next shot – while Mel makes a ‘nice pear’ joke that Luis completely ignores. Good for you, Luis. Mel’s better than that.

(She really, really isn’t.)

She does make a very good ‘cutting it fine’ joke at this point, which is only slightly ruined by that blue bandage.

Now we have a montage of people wrapping pears in pastry (“It’s like I’m mummifying a pear,” notes Martha, stealing joke potential from me). This is up there with stuffing a mushroom in the life’s-too-short stakes, surely, and the ultimate reward is so small. And it’s not going well for our Rich.

I’m pretty sure this is what that London 2012 sculpture looks like.

OH NOOOOOOOOO.

No, sorry, THIS is what the London 2012 sculpture looks like.

They are all presented. Mezza Bezza and Paul aren’t very impressed, on the whole. Richard’s is a hot mess, and obviously comes last (he is very witty about it in the post-challenge interview, suggesting that he’d have done better if he’d set the tent on fire.) Martha redeems herself by coming top of the rankings.

We come to the final challenge, and it’s raining. Everybody has an umbrella, seemingly, except for Luis. Questions must be asked.

The steps continue to be an inadequate substitute for The Bridge.

They’re making tiered pies. This, again, isn’t a thing. Have they run out of baked goods that actually exist? It does give me an opportunity, though, of crowning the winner in my Facebook Pun Competition:

Well done, Adam. Proud day for you.

Paul is obsessed with stating the obvious this week: ‘this is a pie challenge’. At which point we immediately cut away to someone stuffing a chicken. And it’s not even Nancy and her penchant for East End greasy spoons!

Pie, schmie.

Several of the bakers are making hot water crust pastry (I don’t know which of those words should be joined together, so I’ve spread them all apart) including Richard. “You could build a house out of it, probably!” he says, in an amazingly shoe-horned-in manner, for which I can only admire him. Truth be told, they’ve mentioned the building profesh less than I thought they would.
(This is famous last words, isn’t it?)
(Ah… yes. Moments later, he’s making ‘posh builder’s pies’.)
(Are these posh pies for builders or pies for posh builders? Enquiring minds must know.)

Kate (who is using prunes and rhubarb – good grief, why?) warns us that the pastry mustn’t be too hot or too cold. It’s just dawned on me that all five series of GBBO – with all their dire pronouncements “not too long in the oven, or too little time”, “not too much kneaded, or too little”, “not left to prove for too long, or too briefly” etc. – have essentially been a longwinded retelling of Goldilocks.

On a similar theme, Martha is making a ‘Three Little Pigs’ trio. My friend Malie wondered if she was going to make one tier out of straw, one out of wood, and one out of bricks – gosh, can you imagine the triumphant display Frances from Series 4 would have produced? – but instead she has gone the macabre route of adding insult to injury and mocking dead pigs by subverting a story in which they figure as (well-meaning, if stupid) heroes, as well as eating them. Martha, you big bad wolf.

You can tell I’m a vegetarian, can’t you?

So what is Norman making? Three steak and kidney pies, you’d assume, if that doesn’t sound too exotic. But – no! He really is pulling out all the stops. By which I mean that he is putting every single flavour he’s ever heard of into this creation – haggis, duck, venison, spinach, haddock, cheese, raspberry, passion fruit, and lavender. Seriously. This is what we call going from one extreme to another. Brilliantly, he calls it his Pieffel Tower.

For Nancy, they just reuse footage from bread week, as far as I can tell.

“I call it Lots of Meat in Carbs.”

Paul reminds Chetna of her flavouring mishaps in the Signature Challenge, and she appears to dither back and forth over whether or not to stab Paul through the heart.

Mel calls Norman ‘Normski’, and he quotes Robert Burns. There’s no way I can improve on that.

Richard: “I’m just knocking up the final pie… I mean lovingly crafting the final pie!” He cracks me up. But all the wit and self-awareness in the tent is making it difficult to write recaps, guys. And then comes my favourite moment of the episode, and one which entirely brings me around to Richard’s Ways. Nancy is on the hunt for a pencil. Guess who has one to hand? Or, should I say, to ear?

And the tent hosts the smallest ever relay race.

Bless them. I have accepted the pencil.

Dramatic musical instruments now – tuba and xylophone?

Pies are coming out of ovens everywhere – I’m starting to realise how much Paul and Mary are going to eat. Things aren’t looking good for Norm, as there is the first ever instance of Sue stealing a baker’s food and not liking it… in this case, lavender meringue.

“…but why?”

Martha’s pie has sprung a leak! Wasn’t she listening to those wise words about holes in pastry letting things go through them? CATASTrop… no, wait, apparently it’s fine.

Luis has a spirit level, thus treading all over Richard’s schtick.

I’m enjoying the different ways the bakers are incorporating tiers. We have plastic, wooden, and cardboard tiers – and then some (Chetna and Martha) are just dumping their pies on top of one another in a big PIEle. Pie. Pile. Geddit? (Leave me alone… it’s better than Sue’s ‘surpies!’ which means nothing in or out of context.)

Somewhere Frances is watching and she’s ANGRY.

A PIE FALLS OVER.

My friend Hannah shrieked at this point, which was terrifying, but Luis’ pie is resilient and he just shoves it back on top. And… time is up!

Here are my two favourites:

Quite a lot of compliments, but not for poor old Norman. The lesson here, to quote The Simpsons, is: never try. Richard’s is burnt, Martha’s needs three people to carry, Kate’s is a festival of floral eccentricity, and Chetna is recrowned Flavour Queen.

The judges and presenters repeat everything they’ve already said, backstage, and bring up the idea that Diana’s absence might mean nobody goes home. Mary is firm in refusing to reveal anything, and also says perhaps her harshest criticism yet: “I’ve never had lavender in meringue before, and I don’t think I want it again.” Ouch.

So, who is star baker? It’s Brighton’s finest (“I am as southern as they get”):

And going home? With a catch in my throat…

He needs an umbrella for my tears.

And, like that, the Great British Beige Off ended, losing both its contestants in one week. And, uncharacteristically, in a whirl of lavender-flavoured egg. Oh, Norman, it’s not going to be the same without you! You are already a national treasure.

See you all next week!

Pleasures and Landscapes by Sybille Bedford

Another book review to point you to in Shiny New Books! This one is by an author I’d love to know more about – Sybille Bedford. She seems so fascinating. I loved her novel A Favourite of the Gods, and so I took Daunt Books up on their offer of her collected travel writing, Pleasures and Landscapes (2003, although collected from mostly 1950s and 1960s articles).

I usually don’t like travel writing, so I was nervous, but I really liked the way Bedford writes – and the unusual (often food-orientated) take she has on the world. If that’s tickled your fancy, you can read the whole review on Shiny New Books

Home by Marilynne Robinson

Since I’ve got a review copy of Lila on my shelves (the third of Robinson’s novels to concern the good people of Gilead), I thought it was about time that I read Home (the second, from 2008, after 2004’s Gilead). When I read Gilead, I was completely bowled over. How could an elderly minister’s reminiscences create such a stunning work of fiction? On the strength of one book, Robinson became the living writer I admired the most. A subsequent read of Housekeeping did nothing to diminish this, and reading Home has cemented her position. Nobody else holds a candle to her.

Home covers much of the same time period as Gilead, although it is not a requirement to have read the former before you read the latter. Indeed, it would be interesting to read all three of this series in various orders – it’s been so long since I read Gilead that I have forgotten a lot of it, so it was a bit like coming to the characters for the first time. And, indeed, different characters take centre stage. While Gilead is narrated by the Rev. John Ames, Home looks at his neighbour’s house. Ames’ closest friend, Rev. Robert Broughton, is old and ailing. His wife has died, and he is looked after by the only child who has remained at home – Glory, a spinster who is kind, good, and a little regretful. The novel sees how they cope with the return, after twenty years, of Glory’s wastrel brother Jack.

His return will be familiar to readers of Gilead, and Ames certainly did not approve of him, but seeing him through the eyes of his family is a different matter. Glory is some years younger than him, separated by several siblings, and never felt that she knew him very well. Robert has longed for him to return – their dynamic is very much that of the Prodigal Son and the Forgiving Father – but even his patience and hope have their limits.

It’s very difficult to talk about great writers, or to pinpoint what makes them great. Home details the awkwardness of people who are biologically very close and emotionally very distant, but not through arguments or slamming doors. Instead (and no author does this better) Robinson shows us the silences – the emotions that family members cannot discuss, the past hurts they cannot confront, and the future hopes they dare not express. All the more impressive that this is done in the third person, so – although it feels like we know all three key players intimately – we are never actually taken into their perspective wholly. Being very close to my nuclear family, particularly my brother, I can’t quite understand the awkwardness of Glory and Jack’s relationship, but (being a family of introverts) I can understand the reluctance to discuss depths of emotions – and yet communicating them at the same time.

Like Gilead, there is a background of faith to the novel. But, where Gilead is a beautiful depiction of a life of faith, Glory is a little less certain. She seems occupied more with duty and goodness than with grace, try as she might. She sums up the theme of the book while musing on the Bible:

What a strange old book it was. How oddly holiness situated itself among the things of the world, how endlessly creation wrenched and strained under the burden of its own significance. “I will open my mouth in a parable. I will utter dark sayings of old, which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us.” Yes there it was, the parable of manna. All bread is the bread of heaven, her father used to say. It expresses the will of God to sustain us in this flesh, in this life. Weary or bitter or bewildered as we may be, God is faithful. He lets us wander so we will know what it mean to come home.
‘Home’ is, unsurprisingly, the biggest quandary in Home. What makes a home? What does it mean to come home?  For Glory, home is a place of safety and continuity, but also a place of disappointment and a sense of failure. For Jack, it is a mirage and somehow dangerous. For Robert, it is chiefly an ideal in his mind.

One of the loveliest things in both this novel and Gilead is the friendship between neighbouring ministers. Friendship is depicted so seldom in literature, and it is touching to see one that has proved far more constant and successful than romantic or paternal relationships. And for readers like me who dearly love Ames, it is a joy to see him again – albeit frustrating at how little we see of him! Not to mention illuminating to see a different vantage of a man that any reader of Gilead will know intimately. It’s like hearing your best friend described by somebody who only knows them a little.

I quote this passage partly because Ames is in it, but mostly because it’s a lovely example of how beautifully Robinson writes a domestic scene:

Then Ames arrived with Lila and Roddy, the three of them in their church clothes, and she took her father into the parlor with them, the company parlor, where they sat on the creaky chairs no one ever sat on. It had been almost forgotten that the were not there just to be dismally ornamental, chairs only in the sense that the lamp stand was a shepherdess. Ames was clearly bemused by the formality her father had willed upon the occasion. The room was filled with those things that seem to exist so that children can be forbidden to touch them – porcelain windmills and pagodas and china dogs – and Robby’s eyes were bright with suppressed attraction to them.
Home has so many nuances and is so rich in insight that it would be futile to go much further. I don’t love it as much as Gilead – perhaps because I missed the first-person voice that Robinson handles so extraordinarily – but I am still amazed by what a great work it is. Sometimes I wonder which writer from our time will be remembered in future generations and centuries. If there is any justice in posterity, Robinson will be among that number.

Great British Bake Off: Series Five: Episode Four

Wow, guys, WHAT an episode. Who’d have thought that this baking show would make headlines across the country? It leaves me quite a lot to live up to, particularly since I’m used to making high drama from very little in these recaps. In this week’s episode, there actually is high drama. But we’ll save that for later, and treat things as normal for the moment – which means sunny opening shot of Mel and Sue, reference to Mary’s bomber jacket, and it’s all bakers present and correct for pudding week.

But things are tense already. Seldom has a montage of people putting on aprons been filled with more foreshadowing. Chetna is looking anxious, Luis is nervous, and Alex/Kate looks (if she doesn’t mind me saying) like somebody who once ran a marathon. The biggest question on my lips, though, is – did these four deliberately match the shade of their jeans?

Probably not.

Time for Blazer Watch, of course. Sue’s is getting suspiciously slack. That’s one step away from a cardy, love. And, while Paul’s continuing lack of suit jacket is our first indication that it’s very warm, Mary knows that art is pain, and continues to button up. As Beyonce once said, Pretty Hurts.

The first challenge is: self-saucing puddings. This gives Mel and Sue carte blanche for Carry On Baking vaudeville throughout. The bakers find it hilarious, including future best friends Norm and Martha.

Why aren’t these two on Celebrity Antiques Hunt yet?
I even renewed my TV licence today like a fool.

It also seems to be entirely open to interpretation. The sauce can be under, in, on top of, or vaguely near the pudding. (NB #selfsaucing was trending on Twitter at this point. What a time to be alive.)

Mel says they have to make eight ‘individually portioned’ self-saucing puds. No idea what individually portioned could mean, let alone self-saucing puds, but Paul is on hand to explain. He says the key thing is to keep the sponge nice and light. “Timing is everything”. (No mention of the sauce so far.) Mary steps up with the helpful advice that it has to ‘have the right consistency, and – for me – it has to have some texture to it’. Everything has some sort of texture, and I don’t know what she means, but it’s Mary, so I assume she wants alcohol involved.

“Where’s my gin at?”

Luis says that puddings are not his strongest area (this is dessert week, Luis, puddings will be another time! Yes, I know that nobody outside of the Bake Off scheduling people really use those words differently) and it doesn’t help that he seems to be boiling potatoes.

“Fancy” – Norman.
(That’s the only one I’ll use this week.)
(Maybe.)

Martha is adding peanut butter to her fondants, which is a big no-no for me. She’s also in the middle of her A Levels, which is pretty impressive.

Nancy: “this is the chocolate mix for the centre of my pudding. The sauce, if you like”. She’s caught on to the buzzwords of the episode perfectly, hasn’t she? She still seems delightfully unbothered by the whole process. Then she engages the judges in a keen game of charades.

“Third word…”

She says she’s going to push the envelope. My friend Emily, watching with me, perspicaciously commented “You don’t have to push envelopes. People want envelopes.”

“I need to get a wiggle on” – Alex/Kate. Surely the expression is ‘wriggle’?

Watching again, I see that we have all sorts of omens. Kate slowly wanders over to a freezer. Iain tells us that timing isn’t his forte. There are shots – so subtle as to be almost subliminal – of ice caps melting, polar bears looking forlorn, and Alaska sinking into the sea.

Also, I’m sure his beard and head hair started off as the same colour. One seems to be getting lighter, and the other darker, as the series continues.

Science doubtless has the answers.

He’s making something with chocolate, lime, and raspberry, which are three wonderful flavours. Paul likes chocolate and lime together, and so do I – chocolate and lime sponge cake is one of my favourite things to bake. Truth story from real life.

Guess who’s decided to keep it simple this week?

Well, that plan’s worked beautifully so far, why not? (In his defence, sticky toffee pudding is amazing.)

The cameraman remains curiously obsessed with Diana’s trainers. A couple of series ago the BBC was slapped on the wrist for showing the logo of Smeg fridges too much. Have Nike now got an underhand deal with the Beeb? Or is this some sort of unclear foreshadowing again?

Or is to show that something’s AFOOT??

The puddings go in the respective ovens, and it’s time for Sue to give us the history of cake. It’s the most heavy-handed link yet (“I like desserts. So does Paignton!”) and self-saucing puds aren’t mentioned, presumably because they were made up someone in a BBC office in a panic.

Also, Sue apparently thinks it’s appropriate to chat with an aged historian on deckchairs while wearing a blood-stained skull T-shirt.

And we’re back in the tent. Dr. Paul Cleave has got a ‘proof of the pudding’ joke in there (the PUN KLAXON taking an unprecedented trip to Devon) but they’re staunchly avoiding it in the tent. Must save something for next week, you can see Mel thinking. There seem to be some mini, individually portioned, catastrophes… but these are quickly glossed over. This, if nothing else, should have warned me of what was to come. Usually a bubbling pudding would have been previewed half a dozen times, and made the centrepiece of the show.

#drama

Kate, of course, hams it up no end.

Richard, meanwhile, checks to see if his prop is in place.

Instruments that the soundtrack have brought into play: french horn? Not sure – something unduly brassy.

Bakers dust and press and tweeze and place, the camera spins dizzily around every bake and zooms in unnervingly close to corners of puddings, then everything is ready for judging.

Paul uses ‘drop through’ as a noun.

“Now that’s what I call a sauce pudding!” Mary says of Richard’s pud, clearly having been as at sea as the rest of us, and relieved to have been given some indication of what one might be.

He does well. Martha glues Paul’s mouth together. Luis’s sauce is more of a liquid. ‘Almost a wet liquid’, says Paul, which leads one to wonder – what could a dry liquid possibly be like?

They’re not very impressed by Norman’s presentation – quelle surprise! – but I’d love to try it. And I do wonder if they’d have mentioned it for any other baker (they look a darn sight better than Martha’s peanut splodges, for instance).

Over with the other Great British Beige Off contestant – Diana gets good feedback on her orange surprise thingummy, which looks a little like it’s enacting Ode on a Grecian Urn, and she is pretty euphoric about it.

Nancy, on the other hand, isn’t happy with her critique – saying (in a way that rather misses the point of being in the competition at all) that puddings get eaten so quickly that it doesn’t really matter if they don’t have any sauce.

“Four puddings a pound, a pound, lovely puddings”

Meanwhile, Martha is having an exam-fuelled breakdown. “I try and be a tough cookie. Sometimes it’s a bit hard and the cookie crumbles.” I think she’s babbling rather than distraught. Norman, on the other hand, is unaffected by his critique – saying that sticky toffee pudding isn’t meant to look nice. He suggests it is the opposite of the sort of person who looks nice and is ‘rotten in the middle’. That took a turn, didn’t it? His interview is beautifully juxtaposed with this sheep:

Technical challenge time: Mary’s tiramisu cake. CAKE? That doesn’t sound like a dessert to me. Food etymology fans, did you know that tira mi su is Italian for ‘pick me up’? Which suggests, to me, that Mel and Sue can be translated as Mel and Up. (Sorry.)

“I think I’m the only person that’s made it before in the whole room, and I’m the youngest by far,” says Martha, and somehow doesn’t come across as appalling. She is super lovely. (But, fyi, Richard has now taken the coveted second place in my affections – behind Norm, obvs – as I love how resolutely cheerful he is all the time. Martha is in at third.)

“It is quite tricky to make,” says Mary – get used to that line, it’s not the last time we’ll hear a similar sentiment. “What I’m looking for is every layer to be evenly soaked in the coffee and brandy mixture.”

Where’s my brandy at?

Iain says something that just sounds like a series of vowel sounds to me. Luckily my lovely Northern Irish housemate Laura is on hand to translate. It’s something about flour. She’s not here as I recap, and I can’t remember.

Norman’s mixture has ‘a few spots of flour, here and there, but you always get that’. He’s not what you’d call a perfectionist, is he?

“Right – in the oven,” says Diana, taking it upon herself to provide audio commentary for the blind.

BUT WHAT FOOTWEAR DOES SHE HAVE ON?

This week’s to-prove-or-not-to-prove-that-is-the-question is clingfilm vs. baking paper. This could probably have provided twenty minutes of nail-biting controversy if we hadn’t been steaming through the challenge to get to the #bincident.

Alex/Kate slams her oven door closed – Alex/Kate! If Mrs Poll taught me one thing in GCSE food technology, and she did just about teach me one thing, it’s that you close oven doors gently to prevent a rush of cold air. (I got an A, thankyouverymuch, thanks for asking.)

Everybody is preparing to slice their sponges in half, and Richard has run into difficulties…

(Insert building pun here.)

He throws it in the bin. FORESHADOWING. Iain has problems. FORESHADOWING. Diana talks to herself. FORESH–, wait, no, that doesn’t happen again.

Nancy is making a layer from ‘remnants’. I love how little she cares.

Mary’s recipe doesn’t specify how much brandy/coffee mixture to add but, c’mon, this is Mary. Pour a whole bottle in, and she’ll quite literally lap it up. We also see the first of Martha’s many anxious looks-around-the-tent…

#side-eye

Wonderfully, Luis has drawn out a diagram saying sponge/cream/sponge/cream/sponge/cream. Mel makes fun of him in an adorable way.

He is a graphic designer, after all.

Even Marth isn’t sure what temperature the tempered chocolate should be. “Even a few degrees out, and the chocolate will lose it’s shine and be difficult to work with.” LIKE SUE, AM I RIGHT, AMIRITE?  (No, not really.)

Finishing touches are done all round – special mention should be made of Luis’s wonderful chocolate calligraphy…

…and Sue hears ‘the gentle padding of lady moccasins’. Mary is returning. The challenge is over. Norman says he is “surprised by how good it looks”, which can only mean that they’ll think it a mess. He’s always so optimistic.

I think everyone has done a brilliant job – and Mezza and Pazza don’t have many criticisms to give, on the whole. Mary complains that some of them don’t have enough ‘coffee mixture’. She keeps using the words ‘coffee mixture’, when we all know that she means…

“…where’s my brandy at?”

With no disasters, there’s not much to say. Diana comes last, followed by Norm. Luis is second, and lovely Martha comes top. “Well done!” says Mary, as though addressing a toddler. But she doesn’t give as good shocked face as Luis.

Imagine if he wins?

The showstopper challenge is… Baked Alaska! Since nobody has made one of these since 1974, the bakers can be forgiven for being pretty relaxed in how they interpret it. (Somewhere – presumably at an ABBA-themed party, with olives and bright orange cupcakes – The Brend is gnashing his teeth and wondering why he wasn’t asked to make a Baked Alask.)

At this juncture, I’d like to express my disappointment that nobody uses this joke: “What does Mary think?” / “I don’t know, Alaska.” Ahahahaha.

“It’s a sponge base and an ice cream; what could go wrong?” asks Luis
“There are many things that can go wrong in a Baked Alaska,” answers Paul. Only he’s sat outside, and it was probably filmed on a different day, so it can hardly be called a conversation. “There’s Joconde, there’s Victoria, there’s Genoise,” says Paul, apparently having forgotten the names of any of the contestants.

Fans of repetition are treated to both judges and most of the bakers telling us that it’s hot in the tent; ideal weather for making ice cream. But nothing can stop daredevil Norm from pulling out the stops. Not satisfied with dabbling in the exotic world of pesto, this week he’s using… strawberry. Oo-la-la.

The surprise is that it has the exact ingredient mentioned in the name.

Martha’s making a sort of key lime pie Alaska, with coconut, which sounds in every way amazing.

Chetna mournfully tells us that she used to have mangoes all summer.

Iain is using black sesame seed ice cream – because who doesn’t want their food to be grey? Mary Reaction Face time.

Nancy’s has three stripes (two ice creams and a parfait) which Mary suggests will be like a football jersey, and Nancy believes will closely resemble a rainbow. Have either of them ever seen either of these things?

Alex/Kate says that she’s making a very kitsch Baked Alaska. So far, so tautological – but it’s difficult to see quite why she believes hers is more kitsch than anybody else’s. She even references her ‘fellow Brightonians’. Ugh. Shameless, Kate; you’re better than that.

Iain talks about wanting to put his ice cream in the freezer, which is numbingly obvious at the time, but significant after the event…

Norman looks absolutely disgusted by his ice cream, but apparently this is a look of pleasure.

“I could have been born in Italy” – actual thing he says.

MYSTERY CHEST FREEZER ALERT.

Never mentioned again.

There’s lots of stuff about them making meringues, but there’s not much to say – although mention must be made of Norman’s statement ‘A year ago I didn’t know what an Italian meringue was’ – presumably the same sentence would have held true with either ‘Italian’ or ‘meringue’ deleted – and this shot of Luis multitasking:

Norm is the king of photobombing

Alex/Kate tells us it’s hot. Going for a variation on a theme, Norm speaks of the warmth of the tent. Ever the scientist, Sue opts for “It’s 25 degrees.”

Ladies and gentlemen, we come to the crux of the episode. Which I shall narrate in images.

Poignant, no?

On re-watching, it becomes clear that Iain asked about freezer space, and Diana/Nancy knew it was his when they took it out… and… well, you know by now. It was left on the side. It *looks away from camera; sheds a tear* melted.

(I should say at this point, I think Diana has suffered enough, and my blog is intended to poke gentle fun at the whole thing, not be cruel – so don’t expect any witch-hunt or meanness from me.)

Accompanied by guttural scream

Diana: “You’ve got your own freezer, haven’t you?”
Iain: “Why would you take ice cream out of the freezer?” (which invites the response: to eat it.)

I can do no more than state the facts. I can’t believe how fraught and emotional this was. My friends and I were screaming at the television. I feel like we are part of history. “Do you know where you were when Iain found out his ice cream was taken out of the freezer?” we will say to each other through time. Children will tire of their parents talking about it. Grandparents will reminisce. This is truly the defining moment of the third millennium AD.

My biggest question, though, is why – knowing that it was not frozen – Iain chose to take the tin off. What did he think would happen? Was he hoping that his vendetta against gravity (so clearly evidenced by his hairstyle) had finally been successful?

Sue desperately tries to calm him down, but… #BINCIDENT. #MELTDOWN. #PASSPORTTONEWSNIGHT. He storms out. It’s not frozen, Iain, you should let it go. (Geddit? Frozen. Let it go. Wit.)

And then my favourite moment of the whole show – Richard and Kate have a gossip in the corner. “Iain threw his in the bin!” says Kate. “He didn’t!” from Richard. He sounds every bit like an archetypal spinster in a Miss Read novel and I LOVE it.

“Oooo – he never did! Well, I’ll go to the foot of our stairs.”

Chetna is very lucky that Iain has stormed out, as her ice cream has also melted everywhere, and she’s trying to put it back in place with her hands while Martha anxiously stands behind her. Unsurprisingly, it’s not very effective.

Iain – presumably having been refused the bus fare away from this house in the middle of nowhere – wanders back into the tent.

Does anybody care any longer about these Alaskas? Well, I do, and these were my favourites:

When it comes to Chetna’s turn, she presents a melted mess, but Mary says that she ‘has a smile on her face, which is what it’s all about!’ No, Mary, it isn’t. (But I still love you, Chetters!)

It looks rather like a blobfish. Google it.

Incidentally, loving Richard’s cajz lean against hedge. (Yes, cajz is how I’m abbreviating ‘casual’. We all need to make our peace with that and move on.)

Cajz.

Then the music gets all tinkly and sombre, and for some reason Iain processes up with the bin. Chetna and Luis have their heads in their hands (in clips probably filmed some hours earlier). Iain is a gent, and doesn’t mention Diana at all (so far as we see.)

Mary is very sweet to Iain at this moment, beaming away and saying that everybody makes mistakes. It’s a different tune in the backstage debrief. “I think that’s sort of unacceptable.” Ouch. Somewhere a fairy has died.

As you’ll probably know by now, going home is…

Mr Tumnus

Sue and Mel seem genuinely heartbroken by the news.

Star baker, more happily, is Richard.

It’s been an emotional rollercoaster this week, baking fans. I don’t know if can keep up with this excitement.

(And can you spot where this week’s OxfordDictionaries.com update word is, Helen??)

See you next time!

The Man Booker longlist

Thanks so much for all your suggestions on 1990s books – I will reply soon, and there are lots I haven’t read. If you thought that was unusually modern for Stuck-in-a-Book, then brace yourself for this: the Man Booker longlist. Granted it was announced some time ago, but I’m not one for keeping my finger on the pulse…

To Rise Again at a Decent Hour, Joshua Ferris (Viking)
The Narrow Road to the Deep North, Richard Flanagan (Chatto & Windus)
We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves, Karen Joy Fowler (Serpent’s Tail)
The Blazing World, Siri Hustvedt (Sceptre)
J, Howard Jacobson (Jonathan Cape)
The Wake, Paul Kingsnorth (Unbound)
The Bone Clocks, David Mitchell (Sceptre)
The Lives of Others, Neel Mukherjee (Chatto & Windus)
Us, David Nicholls (Hodder & Stoughton)
The Dog, Joseph O’Neill (Fourth Estate)
Orfeo, Richard Powers (Atlantic Books)
How to be Both, Ali Smith (Hamish Hamilton)
History of the Rain, Niall Williams (Bloomsbury)

I usually steer clear of Booker winners. I’ve only read three from the past decade, and all of them were underwhelming (The Sense of an Ending, The Finkler Question, and The Line of Beauty) and in fact I gave up halfway through two of them – but sometimes the shortlists and longlists bring up more intriguing titles.

When the longlist was announced, the editors of Shiny New Books had a fun conversation about it – I think you’ll enjoy reading it, especially if you like my cynical moments – and I hadn’t read any of them (unsurprisingly). I had heard of nearly all of the authors, though, which is a sign of what Shiny New Books has done to me.

After that, though, I did read Karen Joy Fowler’s We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves, and reviewed it for SNB. It was good. But it wasn’t any better than good. I don’t understand by what criteria it made this list. Intriguing.

Have any of you read any of these, or want to? I’d like to read the Nicholls, and that might be it…