Underfoot in Show Business by Helene Hanff

Sad to say, though I have eked them out for years, I’ve now read my final book by Helene Hanff. I bought my copy of Underfoot in Show Business in 2012, but I’ve pictured the lovely new edition from Manderley Press.

Hanff is, of course, best known for the delightful 84, Charing Cross Road, and aficiandos of that book will recognise some of the people and incidents in Underfoot in Show Business – you might recall, for instance, that Hanff made money writing for American detective dramas. Or perhaps you think fondly of Maxine, who snuck nylons onto the desk of No.84 – she figures large in this book. This book actually came first, and it is a bold, brash, delightful announcement of her arrival on the literary scene.

What role did Hanff play in showbusiness? Well, she wanted to make it as a playwright. The book charts her attempts to succeed in this select sphere – and very funny it is too. While she is something of a ball-buster (if I may be permitted some American lingo) in her most famous book, here her humour is very self-deprecating. From the way she frames her stories, we can be pretty confident that she will not make it as a playwright – even though there is definitely early promise. She wins various scholarships and awards, she gets phone calls and meetings with some of the most important people in the theatrical world, and she seems to write and re-write plays at the drop of a hat.

We never get a sense of what her writing for the stage is actually like – Underfoot in Show Business is not that sort of memoir. It’s really just an excuse for Hanff to laugh at herself – and, for good measure, everyone else involved in this strange world. The cheerful insincerity of producers and agents, the breathless optimism of everyone, and that colossal waste of time that dogs everyone’s attempt to ‘make it’. (The book may be 65 years old, and about a time even earlier, but I suspect a lot of things have not changed.)

Producer No.3 was elderly and semiretired but he’d had a legendary career in his day.

“Yours is the first play he’s been interested in in five years,” said my agent, impressed. “He wants to take you to lunch.”

I met the legendary producer for lunch at the Algonquin, where for two hours he talked of his producing days, the great stars and playwrights he’d discovered and the contrasting sorry state of the contemporary theatre. When we parted, he wished me every success and certainly hoped one of these younger fellows would have the sense to produce my play. (Agent’s translation: “I guess he’s broke.”)

Maxine only hovers around the peripheraries of 84, Charing Cross Road, but here she is a star. Flame-haired, vibrant, an excellent actress and totally tone-deaf, Hanff basks in her star-quality and her friendship – while sharing similar levels of disappointment and picking-yourself-up-again. Maxine is not a pseudonym – you can look up Maxine Stuart, to see her successful, if not world-grabbing, acting career. She is such a whirlwind and a breath of fresh air, from using pilfered stamps to pay bills to getting a role in a musical without revealing her inability to sing. You certainly can’t help but love her. Maxine and Helene have the sort of friendship we all long for.

Hanff does eventually get regular writing work for TV, for which she is grateful while still finding and delighting in the ridiculous elements of it. Particularly tricky are the unspoken restrictions of TV detective dramas – the tiny cast meaning the list of suspects is often down to two, and the sponsorship by a cigar company meaning they have to scotch a plot point involving cigarette ash. It’s fascinating.

And when she isn’t working directly in writing, she gets a job reading for a studio – making her way through recent novels, and writing up reports about whether or not they had potential for adaptation. It sounds an other-worldly job, but I do have a friend who did the same thing until she retired a few years ago. While it is only tangentially related to the main thrust of her memoir, I think it was the part I found most interesting and entertaining. And I’m going to leave you with her hot-take on one of the books she had to read…

Well, on the blackest Friday I ever want to see, I was summoned to Monograph and handed three outsized paperback volumes of an English book which was about to be published here I was to read all three volumes over the weekend, and since each volume was double the length of the usual novel I was invited to charge double money for each. I hurried home with the three volumes and after dinner began to read Volume I. And if Monograph’s office had been open at that hour, I’d have phoned and quit my job.

What I had to read, during that nightmare weekend — taking notes on all place names, characters’ names and events therein — was fifteen hundred stupefying pages of the sticky mythology of J. R. R. Tolkein. (I hope I’m spelling his name wrong.) I remember opening one volume to a first line which read: “Mr. Bilbo Baggins of Bag End announced that he would shortly be celebrating his eleventy-first birthday…” and phoning several friends to say good-bye because suicide seemed so obviously preferable to five hundred more pages of that.

I also remember the bill I turned in:

For Reading and Summarizing:

TITLE: Lord of the Rings
AUTHOR: J. R. R. Tolkien
Volume I: $20.00
Volume II: $20.00
Volume III: $20.00
Mental Torture: $40.00

TOTAL: $100

They paid it.

Ha! I’d recommend absolutely anything by Hanff, and Underfoot in Show Business is no exception. What an irrepressible, witty, vital writer. What fun to be able to spend more time with her.

1961 Club badge: a library from the 1960s, with the dates 13-19 April 2026 and The 1961 Club overlaid.

The Chateau by William Maxwell – #1961Club

Apparently, I bought The Chateau by William Maxwell back in 2009. Worse, I got it through the post, so I was clearly impatient to be getting into it – and I remember that I relatively quickly started it and read about 100 pages. At which point I stalled, and for many years there was a bookmark at the 100-page mark, taunting me.

Thank goodness for the 1961 Club. This was the first book I started for the challenge, and I went in with some trepidation. Although I remembered very little about the plot beyond the premise – a young American couple, Harold and Barbara, are visiting France shortly after the Second World War – I did remember that I found it very slow. Having now successfully got to the end, I haven’t changed my mind on that. The Chateau is slow – ponderously, intentionally, glacially slow – but in a way that, in the right mood, is an extraordinary experience.

Harold and Barbara set off with high hopes for their holiday. They anticipate romance, beauty, and the comradeship of a nation which has recently won a war with theirs. In the opening chapters, we follow their train journey through the country – drinking in the beauty, not yet disillusioned. It is strange that the woman whose chateau they are staying in hasn’t come to the station to meet them, but as they are taken in humbler transport across the countryside, they are beguiled by the prospect of their new, temporary home:

Before long they had a glimpse of the chateau, across the fields. The trees hid it from view. Then they turned in, between two gate posts, and drove up among curving cinder drive, and saw the house again, much closer now. It was of white limestone, with tall French windows and a steep slate roof. Across the front with a raised terrace with a low box hedge and a stone balustrade. To the right of the house there was an enormous Lebanon cedar, whose branches fell like dark green waves, and a high brick wall with ornamental iron gates. To their eyes, accustomed to foundation planting and wisteria or rose trellises, the facade looked a little bare and new. The truck went through the gate and into a courtyard and stopped. For a moment they were aware of much racket the engine made, and then M. Fleury turned the ignition off to save gasoline and after that it was the silence they heard. They sat waiting with their eyes on the house and finally a door burst open and a small, thin, black-haired woman came hurrying out. She stopped a few feet from the truck and noted bleakly to M. Fleury, who touched his beret but said nothing. We must look very strange sitting in the back of the truck with our luggage crammed in around us, Harold thought. But on the other hand, it was rather strange that there was no one at the station to meet them.

Mme Vienot is the woman and their hostess. They are her paying guests – the sort of visitors who are clearly needed to help with the ancient family’s dire financial state, but who have to go through a pretence of familiarity. It puts them in an awkward position. When the house doesn’t have all the provisions that the advertisement declared – hot water, bicycles to borrow – they cannot complain as they would in a hotel. They are, after all, guests of a sort.

Maxwell has crafted such real people. We feel the awkwardness of the mismatch between hope and actuality – and, more than that, their determination to find the best in the chateau. Harold is occasionally indignant; Barbara is occasionally conciliatory. And there is much to love, too. It is still beautiful, it is still France. True, nobody precisely explains the protocol (they are embarrassed to learn, from other guests, that they should have stayed longer after the meal in the evening) – and, true, Mme Vienot is curiously distant and unfriendly, and Americans are not as beloved as these two Americans had presupposed – but this doesn’t entirely spoil the delight they are taking in the adventure. They are young and in love and passionate, and this is not a novel about disillusionment. It is a gentle novel about a culture clash and the triumph of human nature to persist through it.

I found Harold and Barbara fascinating characters. We’re used to novels about two people falling in love, and perhaps used to portraits of slightly jaded or bitter married couples, but it is less usual to come across an established married couple who are still strongly moved by their mental and sensual love for each other. Maxwell’s writing is always beautiful on the sentence level, often subtly weaving in and out of metaphor in a way I find immensely satisfying.

Somebody who matches him, the curves and hollows of her nature fitting into all the curves and hollows of his nature as, in bed, her straight back and soft thighs fit inside the curve of his breast and belly and hips and bent legs. Somebody who looks enough like him that they are mistaken occasionally for brother and sister, and who keeps him warm at night, taking the place of the doll that he used to sleep with his arm around: Barbara Scully. Barbara S Rhodes, when she writes a check.

What helps the couple feel particularly vivid, though, is Maxwell’s humour. He is excellent at capturing a familiar sort of flippancy between two people who love each other – for instance, when Harold is manfully reading aloud from a history book, Barbara interrupts him with “Couldn’t you just read it to yourself and tell me about it afterward?” These lighter scenes were among my favourite, and leavened a novel that could have felt a bit too pensive without them.

They don’t spend the whole time in the chateau. Over their months in the country, they travel out to different cities, and Maxwell details their activities – the privations of post-war life, the nostalgia about a trip from Barbara’s childhood, detailed scenes of their attempts to get to grips with the value of things, availability of food, correct manners etc. Along the way, they can’t truly connect with the French people they meet – always, they are coming up against invisible walls. They aren’t rejected, and many people are amiable, but nor are they embraced.

Perhaps the most moving relationship is with a couple they meet. Harold thinks Eugene has the possibility to be a dear friend…

Eugene began to sing quietly, under his breath, and Harold rode a little closer to the other bicycle, listening. It was not an old song, judging by the words, but in the tune there was a slight echo of the thing that had moved him so, that day in Blois. When Eugene finished, Harold said: “What’s the name of the song you were singing?”

“It’s just a song,” Eugene said, with his his eyes on the road, and pure, glittering, personal dislike emanating from him like an aura.

The painful discovery that someone you like very much does not like you is one of the innumerable tricks the vaudeville magician has up his sleeve. Think of a card, any card: now you see it, now you don’t…

What a true tragedy, cutting more sharply than many more overblown tragedies. How relatable, how piercing. And how quintessentially Maxwell to slide effortlessly from a specific moment to a general truth, done with an elegance that really feels like he is seeing straight through his characters into the heart of the human condition. Perhaps more difficultly, he does the same for happiness:

They should never have left Beaulieu, but they did; after ten days, he went and got bus tickets, and she packed their suitcases, and he went downstairs and paid the bill, and early the next morning they stood in the road, waiting for the bus to Marseilles. It was impossible to say why people put so little value on complete happiness.

What a beautiful paragraph. I’ve highlighted some of the disjoints in the characters’ experience – between what they hoped and what they experienced, between friendships and unexpected emnities – but there is also so much beauty, life and love in this novel. Maxwell is too subtle a writer to weigh the scales entirely on one side.

The Chateau is quite a long novel, and feels longer. As I said at the beginning, it luxuriates in its slowness. In the wrong mood, I was a little bored and wanted more action, less reflection. But in the right mood – and I was in the right mood almost the whole time I was reading it – I absolutely adored the novel. His exceptional writing, his understanding of people, and his generosity in developing characters make The Chateau something special.

1961 Club badge: a library from the 1960s, with the dates 13-19 April 2026 and The 1961 Club overlaid.

1961 Club: your reviews!

1961 Club badge: a library from the 1960s, with the dates 13-19 April 2026 and The 1961 Club overlaid.

The 1961 Club has started! Karen and I are asking everyone to read and review books published in 1961 – share your links below, or put your review in the comments.

Marry in Haste by Joan Aiken Hodge
Staircase Wit

The Body in the Dumb River by George Bellairs
Fanda Classiclit
My Reader’s Block

Rose Under Glass by Elizabeth Berridge
Stuck in a Book

The Streetwalker by Luciano Bianciardi
Brona’s Books

War Isn’t Wonderful by Ursula Bloom
Stuck in a Book

The Mystery of Banshee Towers by Enid Blyton
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

A Stranger at Green Knowe by Lucy M. Boston
Calmgrove Books

One Hand Clapping by Anthony Burgess
Somewhere Boy

The Soft Machine by William S. Burroughs
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

What is History? by E.H. Carr
Brona’s Books

Daughters-in-Law by Henry Cecil
Literary Potpourri

Abbie and Arthur by Dane Chandos
Stuck in a Book

Just Another Sucker by James Hadley Chase
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

A Lotus for Miss Quon by James Hadley Chase
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

The Pale Horse by Agatha Christie
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Emily’s Runaway Imagination by Beverly Cleary
Staircase Wit

The Mighty and Their Fall by Ivy Compton-Burnett
Somewhere Boy
Stuck in a Book

The Scene of the Crime by John Creasey
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

Heat Wave in Berlin by Dymphna Cusack
ANZ Lit Lovers

James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl
Literary Potpourri
Calmgrove Books

Provincial Daughter by R.M. Dashwood
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

The Ha-Ha by Jennifer Dawson
JacquiWine’s Journal
Just Reading A Book
David’s Book World

The Witch of the Low Tide by John Dickson Carr
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

Faces in the Water by Janet Frame
Stuck in a Book

Pen to Paper by Pamela Frankau
Stuck in a Book

Seven Lean Years by Celia Fremlin
Cross Examining Crime
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

Kaddish and other poems by Allen Ginsberg
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Voices in the Evening by Natalia Ginzburg
Book Around the Corner

Marnie by Winston Graham
AnnaBookBel

My Sad Captains by Thom Gunn
Somewhere Boy

Underfoot in Show Business by Helene Hanff
Stuck in a Book

The Lime Twig by John Hawkes
Typings

A Civil Contract by Georgette Heyer
She Reads Novels
Wicked Witch’s Blog

Little Bear’s Visit by Else Holmelund Minarik
Calmgrove Books

Sunlight on a Broken Column by Attia Hosain
What? Me Read?

Household Ghosts by James Kennaway
Somewhere Boy

Pull My Daisy by Jack Kerouac
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Life and Love in the Henhouse by Irena Krzywicka
This Reading Life

The Siren by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa
Brona’s Brooks

Call for the Dead by John Le Carré
Words and Peace
Books Please

Quaestrio de Cantauris by Primo Levi
Brona’s Books

The Thief and the Dogs by Naguib Mahfouz
What? Me Read?
Winston’s Dad

Inspector Imanishi Investigates by Seichō Matsumoto
JacquiWine’s Journal

Conscience by Ana María Matute
Brona’s Books

The Chateau by William Maxwell
Stuck in a Book

Clock Without Hands by Carson McCullers
746 Books
1st Reading

Horseman, Pass By by Larry McMurtry
Somewhere Boy

Owls in the Family by Farley Mowat
Fanda Classiclit

A Severed Head by Iris Murdoch
Calmgrove Books
Janet – LoveBooks, ReadBooks
Adventures in reading, running and working from home

A House for Mr. Biswas by V.S. Naipaul
Buried in Print

The Methods of Sergeant Cluff by Gil North
Stuck in a Book
My Reader’s Block

Everything That Rises Must Converge by Flannery O’Connor
Rose Reads Novels

Tell Me a Riddle by Tillie Olsen
Madame Bibi Lophile Recommends

The Moviegoer by Walker Percy
746 Books

Owls and Satyrs by David Pryce-Jones
Stuck in a Book

No Fond Return of Love by Barbara Pym
The Middle Shelf

Heaven Has No Favorites by Erich Maria Remarque
Book Around The Corner

The Day of the Owl by Leonardo Sciascia
1st Reading

The Sneetches by Dr Seuss
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Maigret and the Idle Burglar by Georges Simenon
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings
Literary Potpourri

Betty by Georges Simenon
Winston’s Dad

Epidemic by Frank G. Slaughter
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

The Ballad of the Running Man by Shelley Smith
A Hot Cup of Pleasure

The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie by Muriel Spark
What? Me Read?
She Reads Novels
Reading Matters

The Winter of Our Discontent by John Steinbeck
Words and Peace

Bel Lamington by D. E. Stevenson
Adventures in reading, running and working from home
Hopewell’s Public Library of Life

The Ivy Tree by Mary Stewart
Staircase Wit
Fanda Classiclit

The Agony and the Ecstasy by Irving Stone
Volatile Rune

I Was Going Anyway by Robert Switzer
The Dusty Bookcase

Diary of a Mad Old Man by Junichirō Tanizaki
Winston’s Dad

In A Summer Season by Elizabeth Taylor
Somewhere Boy
Stuck in a Book

Treasure of Hemlock Mountain by Virginia Frances Boight
My Reader’s Block

The Blood of the Lamb by Peter de Vries
Typings
Somewhere Boy

The Girl in the Cellar by Patricia Wentworth
Staircase Wit

A Grave Undertaking by Lionel White
Words and Peace

Revolutionary Road by Richard Yates
Madame Bibi Lophile Recommends
Bookish Beck
What? Me Read?

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

Hello all! I’m back from my blogging break, with fresh enthusiasm for it. And let’s kick off with a weekend miscellany – which is really just to remind you that the 1961 Club kicks off on Monday! Grab any book, in any language, format etc, first published in 1961 – and together we’ll read and review as many as we can. Can’t wait.

1961 Club badge: a library from the 1960s, with the dates 13-19 April 2026 and The 1961 Club overlaid.

Alongside that, here is your book, blog post, and link…

1.) The link – I’ve just finished my final Muriel Spark novel, so it’s far too late for me to read an article by James Bailey called ‘Where to start with Muriel Spark‘, but it is interesting nonetheless.

Like A Cat Loves A Bird cover, showing Muriel Spark holding a black cat

2.) The book – talking of which, James Bailey has just published a new biography of Muriel Spark: Like A Cat Loves A Bird. I’m excited to read it at some point, and we do seem to be in a golden era of new Spark biogs (i.e. there is also Electric Spark by Frances Wilson).

3.) The blog post – I’m delighted to learn that Nicholas Royle has written another book about his bibliophilia – Finders, Keepers – and Karen’s review will make you as keen as I am to read it.

A little blogging break

You may or may not have noticed how little I’ve been posting this year – I’ve always blogged as little or as much as I wanted to, and for some reason I haven’t felt the urge as much in the past few months. And so I’m going to go on a proper blog break (rather than the informal one that I’m already seemingly on!) and I’ll be back for the 1961 Club in April. You’ll also see me pop up with Tea or Books? episodes too, of course.

See you in April – as a reminder…

1961 Club badge: a library from the 1960s, with the dates 13-19 April 2026 and The 1961 Club overlaid.

The American Way of Death (1963) by Jessica Mitford

Cover of The American Way of Death

I remember being fascinated by The American Way of Death when I had my Mitfordmania in 2008. Eagerly reading everything I could about this extraordinary family, it seemed so strange and unexpected that one of their many achievements was revolutionising the American funeral industry. How on earth did that factor into the lives of English socialites in the mid-20th-century?

I kept an eye out for a copy of the book, finally buying one in 2019. And it might have languished on my shelves forever, only an episode of Lost Ladies of Lit spurred me to take it off the shelf – and, gosh, what an unusual and excellent book it is. If you think that you aren’t interested in the mid-century funeral industry in the US, then let me tell you – you will be.

Here’s how it opens:

O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? Where, indeed. Many a badly stung survivor, faced with the aftermath of some relative’s funeral, has ruefully concluded that the victory has been won hands down by a funeral establishment – in disastrously unequal battle.

Encapsulated in that paragraph is everything you can expect from Mitford throughout this book. The American Way of Death is characterised by a wry humour which makes it a constant delight to read, even when you are infuriated on behalf of those ‘survivors’. She is gently sarcastic in the direction of the bombast of the poe-faced men and women (mostly men) benefitting from other people’s grief, and she is driven by a sort of compassionate, righteous anger.

I have never organised a funeral, let alone one in mid-century America, and I have very little idea of what the process is – except for the bit involving the vicar. One of the features of growing up in a vicarage is that I often answered the phone to funeral directors, and they were always very pleasant and, indeed, jolly. (Incidentally, one of the strangest phone calls I ever took was a lady hoping to arrange funerals for both her parents – neither of whom were actually dead.)

Having said all that, it becomes clear from Mitford’s extraordinary research that undertakers in mid-century America (who were only recently adopting the term ‘funeral director’ that now seems so commonplace) were on the make. They confronted grieving families with the most underhand tactics of the secondhand car salesman, using the language of faith or duty to extort the most money possible from relatives at a moment when they were least able to defend themselves. Mitford spends much of the book exploring and uncovering what these tactics look like, from the layout of coffin (‘casket’) showrooms to the bending of the truth regarding laws around cremation or embalming. Indeed, you’ll get more details of embalming than you could ever have hoped for, including whether it does or does not impede the decomposition process.

Mitford is clearly winsome enough to have got plenty of funeral men to confide in her – sometimes in the guise of a grieving relative, sometimes more openly as a journalist. Alongside, she has done indefatigable research, gathering brochures, conferences notes and more in giving a full picture of the situation. The defences of the profiteers are pretty flimsy, and she exposes them as such:

The guiding rule in funeral pricing appears to be “from each according to his means,” regardless of the actual wishes of the family. A funeral director in San Francisco says, “If a person drives a Cadillac, why should he have a Pontiac funeral?” The Cadillac symbol figures prominently in the mortician’s thinking. This kind of reasoning is peculiar to the funeral industry. A person can drive up to an expensive restaurant in a Cadillac and can order, rather than the $40 dinner, a $2 cup of tea and he will be served. It is unlikely that the proprietor will point to his elegant furnishings and staff and demand that the Cadillac owner order something more commensurate with his ability to pay so as to help defray the overhead of the restaurant.

Mitford has such a way with words, and it is her style that keeps you reading. Being honest, the book can be rather repetitive. We know the premise and it doesn’t take long to get to grips with the broad trend of what’s going on. Her thoroughness means we see the industry from many different angles and perspectives, but The American Way of Death is endlessly interesting because of the compelling way she writes. What could have been a dry thesis often feels like a novel, peopled with bizarre characters – some good, many bad, and plenty of eccentrics.

One of my favourite sections was on florists – and specifically the increasing popularity of ‘no flowers please’ in funeral notices and obituaries. At the time of Mitford’s writing, the florists were up in arms. I have to quote in full this extraordinary letter, written to a local newspaper after a ‘no flowers’ request was printed:

We wish to express an objection to the reporting of an article concerning the death of —— as it appeared in a recent issue of your paper.

At the close of this article you reported, “The family has asked that flowers be omitted and any tribute be given to the Red Cross or to the Mary Endowment Fund.”

We feel it is not clean business or necessary in reporting a situation, for one business to express the opinion that another business can afford to be penalised in the light of charity. We do not believe in doing a good job of reporting it was necessary to include this paragraph, and the omission of this request would not have changed your ability of reporting his passing.

As a member of the Allied Florists of Saint Louis publicity committee, I know the Post-Dispatch has a generous share of our advertising funds, and the encouragement by your paper to ‘kindly omit flowers’ can hasten the day when the funds available for advertising could be so restricted that the newspapers of this community can lose that source of revenue they have been receiving.

It is not of my mind to question the wishes of any personal family. I naturally am puzzled as to why we florists have been selected as a business which can afford to do without a portion of their business at the expense of charity. I have yet to see a newspaper article on a paid obituary notice suggesting the omission of candy, liquor, cosmetics or tobacco, with funds to be forwarded to charity. It is only in the light of what I consider good business that I draw this to your attention.

This sort of thing scarcely needs any commentary! Mitford knows when to give people enough rope to hang themselves.

The American Way of Death is, of course, a snapshot of a particular time. Some of the things feel like they never caught on (does anybody say ‘cremains’ for cremated remains? Certainly I’ve never come across it) while some things feel irreparably embedded in Western culture. Apparently the publication of the book did lead to significant changes in the funeral industry, and a certain amount of outcry, but I suspect the creeping dominance of late-stage capitalism means some of the worst excesses have found their way back.

While the book was written as an exposé, it is so much more readable than you’d expect a 1960s exposé to be. We are no longer reading primarily as a way of understanding a public scandal – but it is fascinating as a cultural artefact and delightful as the work of a very funny, very persistent author. Come for the funeral facts; stay for the dry wit. What an unexpected classic.

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

I recognise that, at the time of writing, the weekend is almost over – and somehow it is only my third post in February. It has been a busy year so far! I hope you’re having a good month – I’m pleased to say there are finally signs of spring in the air, and I even have a window open (albeit also a heated blanket). For the final hours of the weekend, here is a book, a blog post, and a link…

1.) The link – I enjoyed this Guardian article on reading targets, with quotes from a wide range of philosophies (and pics of the darling of Book YouTube, Jack Edwards, who seems like a wonderful advocate for reading. And followed me on Twitter back when I had a Twitter account, y’all).

2.) The blog post – is actually a video, forgive me. Ages ago I filmed with Shawn from Shawn Breathes Books about a book we both love: O, The Brave Music by Dorothy Evelyn Smith. And now you can watch our hour-long chat in the video below!

3.) The book – speaking of British Library Women Writers, I have now spotted a cover in the wild, so I’ll make a little announcement! It’s been a long time (too long) since we had a new novel in the series – but there will be one in June, and it’s the wonderful The Spring House by Cynthia Asquith. You can preorder in the usual places, and have a gander at what I thought of the book when I read it in 2024.

P is for Panter-Downes

This is part of an ongoing series where I write about a different author for each letter of the alphabet. You can see them all here.

My incredibly occasional look through the alphabet is picking up again at P! I don’t even want to think about how many years I’ve been doing this series for, considering I initially imagined it would only take a few months.

ANYWAY, today we are looking at Mollie Panter-Downes – which wasn’t the hardest choice in the world, since there aren’t many authors beginning with P that have lots of books on my shelves.

How many books do I have by Mollie Panter-Downes?

I have nine books by Mollie Panter-Downes at the moment, and I used to have ten (but passed on At The Pines after reading it, as it sadly wasn’t my cup of tea). Nine doesn’t sound like many, but I think she only wrote ten books – and, believe me, tracking down The Chase, Storm Bird, and The Shoreless Sea isn’t the easiest thing in the world.

How many of these have I read?

All but one of them – just Ooty Preserved remains unread on my shelves. Actually, now I write that, I think perhaps I never read Good Evening, Mrs Craven – one of the short story collections reprinted by Persephone.

How did I start reading Mollie Panter-Downes?

It might have been Minnie’s Room, but I suspect it was One Fine Day. But I certainly first heard of her because of Persephone reprinting her stories.

General impressions…

Would you believe – when I first read One Fine Day, I was rather underwhelmed by it. I was 18, and it was the summer before university. And perhaps I just wasn’t old enough for it? I’ve since re-read it and recognise it as one of the great novels about life immediately after the Second World War – and potentially just one of the great novels altogether.

As for the rest of her writing… London War Notes is absolutely brilliant, on the non-fiction front. It is MPD’s journalistic take on the Second World War in London, written for a contemporary audience in America. It’s fascinating to see the slow progression and changes of wartime experience, with enough contextualising detail to make sense.

And her other novels… well, they’re a mix of fun, silly, and frustrating, to different levels. The best of the rest is definitely My Husband Simon, which is now a British Library Women Writers title – but there is no doubting that One Fine Day is her masterpiece.

A new biography of A.A. Milne

You may well know how much I love A.A. Milne. I wrote all about it back in 2014, and he is such an instrumental part of me establishing my literary taste and discovering what being a bibliophile and book-hunter looked like. And so I was excited to learn that Gyles Brandreth had written a new biography of Milne – and of Winnie-the-Pooh, so goes the subtitle. Called Somewhere, a Boy and a Bear, it is clearly intended to charm an audience more invested in Winnie-the-Pooh than Wurzel-Flummery or Chloe Marr. On whatever front, I was ready to be charmed – and Mum and Dad got me a copy for Christmas.

Brandreth has written a fair few books, but I’d say he is best known in the UK as a sort of cultural curio. He turns up on breakfast TV shows or Celebrity Gogglebox wearing jumpers with teddy bears on them, and says posh, eccentric, kindly things. You can easily imagine that he would love everything connected with the 100-acre wood with the same upper-class simplicity that he probably approaches toast and marmalade, or going to Lords. (He was a Conservative MP for five years, but we won’t hold that against him. It was probably inevitable.)

And so, what sort of book has he written? It is much more focused on Milne than I’d anticipated – it goes through his childhood, his unhappiness at school, his happiness at university, his dizzyingly early achievements as a sketch-writer, comic essayist and playwright. We tread the path through his wartime experience, his sudden and brief success as a detective novelist before the children’s books dominate – and then we wind down on his gradual fading from literary grandeur.

Winnie-the-Pooh et al certainly get plenty of the book, but less than I’d expected – and I was quite grateful about that. Brandreth hasn’t shunted the rest of Milne’s career to the sidelines to give the children’s books unparalleled attention. Rather, he considers them as part of Milne’s long and often-glittering literary reputation. The only exception to this is the way that he intersperses otherwise unrelated sections with quotes from the Pooh books, slightly awkwardly placed in boxes in the middle of the text.

As a Milne aficiando, there wasn’t anything new to me, but I still loved reading it. Brandreth writes with an ease and affection that is infectious. He has clearly read everything he could get his hands on, and it’s evident which works particularly chimed with him – he returns to Chloe Marr quite often, for instance. But… it really is just an affable rehash of Ann Thwaite’s magisterial biography A.A. Milne: His Life. I did wonder if that was why it has no formal referencing – because the source of almost everything he writes is almost certainly Thwaite’s book. It’s a bit of a pity that, 35 years later, there is nothing new to add – but that’s probably because of the sort of writer Brandreth is.

Brandreth is an enthusiast – he is not a researcher. The only new things he brings to the book say more about the world he lives in, because the novel material comes from friendship with Christopher (Robin) Milne. He doesn’t hide this, nor is he needlessly showy about it – he simply shares discussions and perspectives that Christopher Milne shared with him. This largely came when Brandreth was putting together a play, Now We Are Sixty, though it does sound like it flourished into a friendship rather than simply a fleeting professional relationship.

“We were so close,” Christopher told me, “until I left school and beyond, until after the war, really.” Father and son had sport, nature and mathematics in common. Alan delighted in his boy as once he had delighted in his brother.

One presumes that Brandreth is turning to old notes, rather than remembering conversations of many decades earlier.

This is not an insignificant contribution – it takes the book more into the territory of the friend-of-the-family memoir, which is a genre I greatly enjoy, even if Brandreth is certainly on the peripheraries. And it’s a good job that he brings his individual charm to the tone, because otherwise (besides the lack of new material) there are a few things that would otherwise make Somewhere, a Boy and a Bear feel a bit howlery. It seems rather rushed and repetitive – as one example, he is unable to mention Milne’s brother Barry without rehashing that Milne didn’t like Barry but did get on with Barry’s wife. It is probably repeated six or seven times. And then there are unforgivably bad sentences like this:

Boldly, for this feature, in June 1902, for the special May Week issue of The Granta, Alan wrote about the soon-to-be-crowned new king, Edward VII, who had succeeded his mother, Queen Victoria, on her death in January 1901.

How fast do you have to be rushing a book out to let that comma-strewn monstrosity get through? He also has a habit of this sort of chatty, decisive tone, that feels a bit like listening to a self-styled expert in a bar:

When Alan first met the young woman he was destined to marry, he was delighted to discover that she could quote episodes from The Rabbits line by line. Perhaps that’s why he married her. Seriously. He liked that. He liked it very much.

I know I’m singling out suspect sentences, but this isn’t intended as a censure. I only mention them to explain the sort of book this is: it’s a chatty, charming book about an author I love, written by someone who shares that love. Somewhere, a Boy and a Bear is not the work of a biography exploring new territory. It’s a bibliophile sharing his enthusiasms. And, you know what, that was exactly what I was in the mood for.

Turn Again Home (1951) by Ruby Ferguson

I bought Turn Again Home (1951) by Ruby Ferguson when I was in Inverness a couple of years ago – largely on the strength of having enjoyed Lady Rose and Mrs Memmary about 20 years ago, but… I think I’d have bought a book with this cover regardless of who wrote it. This illustration sums up more or less everything I’m looking for in a novel. A big old house, clearly falling apart? Some people in period clothing who are clearly drawn to it? Yes pleeeease. I was prompted to put it closer to the top of my tbr pile when Gina reviewed it so glowingly.

As it turns out, the house plays a relatively minor role in the novel. But it is perhaps emblematic of what the characters are experiencing: Wright, Vida, Hope and Daphne are travelling back to the northern mill town where they grew up. The fictional town of Hockworth, in West Riding of Yorkshire, is dominated by the mill and its industry, and hints of modernity have done little to change that. But for these four siblings – technically three siblings, because Daphne is a sort-of-adopted-but-not-actually addition to the family – Hockworth is a distant memory. They have all left home behind, and only their brother Haigh remains in Hockworth.

Four of the people who stood waiting and shivering on this February afternoon, while the Bradford to Hockworth local train seemed as though it would never come, had a look of being out of place in their surroundings. It was difficult to say exactly how they were unlike their fellow-passengers, for the difference was subtle, and might be described as the look of metropolitans among provincials. On the man and the three women who paced the platform and occasionally glanced anxiously at wrist-watches, you could see overlaid, like the patina on old furniture, that something which was London and which Snebley Heights – never fear! – recognised and scorned. Their clipped voices, borne on the wind, were like the voices of foreigners.

The reason they’ve all travelled back is for an inheritance from their grandmother. The house on the cover, though I was sad by how little time we spent in its environs. But that is because there was so much else to pack into the story…

The four characters are drawn in slightly broad brushstrokes. Vida and Daphne are fashionable, smart women married to wealthy men, and who most openly look down on Hockworth. Vida is sharpest and most disdainful, and Daphne is something of a shadow of her – she reminded me of the way Kitty emulates Lydia in Pride and Prejudice, though what is being imitated is different. Wright is a bachelor too busy with London business to have time for family, and similarly considers his father’s mill-ownership to be rather provincial and very old-fashioned. Hope’s name is rather on the nose, because she is the optimistic, kind one. Working as a teacher, she is the only one with residual fondness for their home.

I’ll be honest – halfway through Turn Again Home, I was a bit disappointed. It was enjoyable enough, and the writing was good, but the characters were a bit one-note. I could see exactly where this sort of story was going. It seemed inevitable that, one by one, they’d be beguiled by nostalgia and the honest goodness of provincial folk, letting their London airs and graces fall away. It was particularly predictable to have all their old servants, and other working-class characters, be mindlessly delighted to see them again. Every working-class figure in Turn Again Home seemed to exist only to hero-worship the memory of the upper-class characters, without a streak of any negativity or individuality in them. I was enjoying the book, but wasn’t very impressed by it.

And yet… things changed. And I think that was largely the introduction of Jessie. For a chapter or so, we are fully back in the past – in the ardent, forceful courtship of Wright with Jessie, the daughter of a mill-hand. Wright’s parents are not snobs – the community seems to be far better integrated than would be possible in a larger town – but they don’t trust his youthful infatuation to last, and they know that Jessie will be the one to suffer. And they are right.

When Wright and Jessie meet again, in present day, we see a much more interesting character than any of the other working-class people. Or, indeed, than any of the upper-class ones. Her mix of regret, contentedness, dignity, and reproach is done extremely well. The strongest of the stories in Turn Again Home is about the ways Wright will or will not be able to reconnect with the woman he wronged.

Once I’d been hooked on that story, the others got me too. I was right in one respect – of course the honest charm of Hockworth would overcome these London cynics – but I was wrong in others. It wasn’t as clear-cut as that, and there were moments of surprise in the narrative. More than that, though, the characters filled out. Their one-note responses to Hockworth revealed hidden depths and complexities, and the plot became extremely compelling. I raced through the final 150 pages, keen to know what would happen to each member of the family, and unsure whether I wanted reality or fantasy to dominate. Ferguson ends up finding a combination of the two that was much more satisfactory than I’d anticipated.

As Gina said, it’s not an easy novel to track down. I was very fortunate to find it in the wild. But it is on Internet Archive, if that is your cup of tea! I’ll certainly be open to reading more by Ferguson, should I be lucky enough to stumble across them, and will make sure I don’t judge the book too quickly.