Checkout

To move onto something very light, probably not for the annals of literature, but an amusing read nonetheless.

Gallic Books
, who print ‘the best of French in English’, sent me a copy of Checkout: A Life on the Tills by Anna Sam. This was originally published as Les tribulations d’une caissiere, and stems from a blog Anna Sam kept about her eight years working in a supermarket. You can tell it was a blog – lots of little snippets, anecdotes from her working day, the traits of customers who come really early or really late, those who ignore her, etc. etc. It’s mostly in the second person (is this more common in French?) in the style of a how-to guide to anybody considering becoming une caissiere.

I shan’t type out vast reams, partly because The Independent has done it for me – click here to read quite a few extracts from the book. It’s very silly, quite diverting, and I found it perfect after a stream of heavier books. Took less than an hour for me to read it, but it might make a fun present for someone.

Only after reading an old article about the French version of Sam’s book did I suspect that Morag Young’s translation may have dumbed down the book… The Telegraph had done their own translation on a bit of the text, before Gallic’s publication: it described the till as ‘one of the most desirable vantage points from which to enjoy the full panoply of human idiocy.’ The sentence has a nice balance, good rhythm, rich words, and well-phrased wit. What do we get in this English version? ‘You are in a perfect position to witness the entire range of human stupidity.’

Perhaps I should learn French…

Persephone Week Redux

I never did quite finish off Persephone Reading Week properly, in the manner of others – which is to say the Persephone Books I’m keen to read next. I had hoped it would clear my backlog a bit, but instead it just made me very keen to read lots of others…

Before I do that, Rachel’s recent post at Book Snob included a picture of all her Persephone titles in non-Persephone editions, as well as a picture of her Persephones. It seemed a fun idea, so here’s mine:


I also have Flush by Virginia Woolf, of course, but not in Somerset. Me being me, I don’t see these collections as competing, but rather complementary… i.e. I’ll buy a Persephone copy and a non-Persephone copy if I come across it cheaply enough.

And my copy of The Priory by Dorothy Whipple came with an exciting surprise, once I got it home…


As for the Persephones I’m now keen to read – here’s the top five.

The Village – Marghanita Laski

Little Boy Lost – Marghanita Laski

Saplings – Noel Streatfeild

Farewell Leicester Square – Betty Miller

A House in the Country – Jocelyn Playfair

Luckily I have all of these waiting on my Persephone shelf. I wonder how many I’ll have read by the time we get to next year’s Persephone Reading Week…

Beg, Borrow, Steal

It’s always nice when a book arrives which isn’t at all my usual kind of thing, and it blows me away. Michael Greenberg’s book Beg, Borrow, Steal: A Writer’s Life sounded like my cup of tea – I have his memoir of his daughter’s mental illness, Hurry Down Sunshine, as yet unread. I thought Beg, Borrow, Steal might be about writer’s block, the publishing process, amusing anecdotes of book signings, seeing your book on the shelf for the first time… well, for the last few chapters it was. But before that there are nearly 40 chapters of an aspiring author talking about nearly everything except writing.

I say chapters. These were all previously columns in the Times Literary Supplement, between 2003 and 2009. And Greenberg writes about everything and anything – this is a writer’s life in one sense: all of his experiences are ignited by a desire to gather stories, create a viewpoint on the world – or rather, New York City. He has had almost every imaginable job – he’s sold fake make-up kits under a bridge; interpreted Spanish in a law court; driven a taxi until he was car-jacked; been a hopeless waiter; even played the stock market. Seemingly able to blend into any scenario, he writes of each with disarming simplicity, always engaging, however unpalatable the topic might be in the abstract.

His life in New York is as a struggling dreamer – one familiar with, and even fond of, the darker, grimier, desperate side of the city. Whereas I get anxious walking down a dim footpath in Oxford. Despite being so different from my usual choice of domestic literature of the interwar years, I was utterly captivated, and it never felt that Greenberg was bragging about his urban experiences – simply documenting them with a writer’s eye. And occasionally this was jolted against his experiences as a father – spending his first two weeks alone with his young son, for example.

Along the way, he garners some writing experience. He never mentions having the TLS column in the columns, but recalls his times keeping a log of his subway journeys; writing for unsuccessful films; being told by an editor that “This manuscript represents everything I hate in fiction.” An example of this book’s humour is seen when Greenberg writes the voiceover for a television programme about golf in America. ‘”Golf. Simple. Majestic. Timeless,” I begin.’

I complete the script and send it off to Zebra. A week later he ‘phones. An executive at the network has complimented my “intimate feeling for the game.” Would I be available to play a round with him at the Westchester Country Club next Thursday? I confess to Zebra that I have never played golf, except for a few holes of miniature golf on Kings Highway in Brooklyn when I was a boy.

“We’ll tell him you’re sick,” says Zebra without skipping a beat. “Something highly contagious.”
Who’d have thought that a book with topics so disparate as beheading chickens, waiting in the dark to see owls, and recording a Talking Book, could make such addictive, coherent reading. All is linked by Greenberg’s distinctive, but unobtrusive, voice.

Sadly for UK readers, this book won’t be published here (by Bloomsbury) until early 2010 – but it is out from Other Press in the US next week. See it here, on their website. The fact that Greenberg’s style and viewpoint are so different from my usual fare makes it easier for me to recognise a writer of great, but unassuming, talent. His clarity, honesty, and simple style reminded me of Homage to Catalonia, and I think it is possible that Greenberg is, stylistically, as quietly brilliant as George Orwell.

I want…

This comes out on 5th November – can it be *any* coincidence that my birthday is the 7th November?

It’s 100 book jackets, as postcards. I don’t know whether I’d stick them on the wall, use them as bookmarks, or just rifle through the box smiling – but what a unique and brilliant idea on Penguin’s behalf. Present-givers, take note. (Though also maybe confer amongst yourselves. I don’t want twelve sets of this come November).

But by the time you read this it will be Our Vicar’s Wife’s birthday. Happy birthday Mum! I made a cake, but it looks something of a failure… not the oven I’m used to, and all that. Still, might taste good, and as Mum says – at least she didn’t have to bake it herself.

Love’s Shadow – Ada Leverson

Well, Bloomsbury have done it again. I’m starting to sound increasingly like a self-appointed marketing director (and I do feel a little responsible for Miss Hargreaves, which I’ll be writing about later in the week) but I can’t help it when the titles they’re reprinting are just so darn good. Today I’m talking about Love’s Shadow by Ada Leverson, first published in 1908.

Elaine at Random Jottings has been an online-friend for over five years, and I read her blog everyday – as she has said in one of her latest posts, we have the same opinions of almost every book, especially when it comes to the first half of the 20th century. And when I discovered that she’d recommended Love’s Shadow to Bloomsbury for their Bloomsbury Group reprint series, I knew I was in for a treat.

The novel is the first in a trilogy called The Little Ottleys (perhaps more will be forthcoming from Bloomsbury?) and the Ottleys in question are Edith and Bruce, married for a few years. Elaine, in her recent review, charmingly and accurately, describes Bruce as Mr. Pooter without the charm – I think his character can be summed up by this:

‘He often wrote letters beginning “Sir, I feel it my duty,” to people on subjects that were no earthly concern of his.’

Edith is obviously fond of him, and parries his ridiculous jibes and moans with a light-hearted wit which is both very amusing to read and an act of supernatural tolerance. Bruce really is the most ghastly imaginable husband, obsessed with being granted his due ‘reverence’ – from his son, his parents, his wife, and more or less everyone else. And like most preposterous characters, he is exceedingly vain. A fabulously witty chapter (Chapter 27, fact fans) chronicles his report of a first foray into amateur dramatics. In later chapters he devotes most of his time and energy to the two lines he has been given, but Chp.27 is so cleverly structured, a vignette of his vanity, self-delusion, and inability to tell a story, that I wish I could reproduce it in full.

This marriage lends the trilogy its name, but Love’s Shadow follows a flock of others, in an amusingly complex array of romantic entanglements, unrequited attachments, and refused proposals. (To set the tone, the union of Lady and Charles Cannon is explained peripherally thus: ‘Having become engaged to her through a slight misunderstanding in a country house, Sir Charles had not had the courage to explain away the mistake.’) Hyacinth Verney is the centre of romantic mishaps, the sort of character who can say, with equanimity; ‘I quite agree with you that it would be rather horrid to know exactly how electricity works’. Perhaps because she is attractive in the way that women seemed to be in 1908 – when introduced to a Mrs. Raymond, the latter ‘looked at her with such impulsive admiration that she dropped a piece of cake.’

How to describe the web? Hyacinth loves impulsive Cecil who loves the impressive Mrs. Raymond who falls for Cecil’s uncle. Sir Charles is Hyacinth’s ward, but also quite smitten by her – as is, we suspect through the disapproval, Bruce. And then there’s Hyacinth’s female companion Anne… Love’s Shadow is flung in so many directions that it’s more or less pitch black – except of course Love’s Shadow isn’t. You can tell that Ms. Leverson was a friend of Oscar Wilde – she is consistently witty, though without his love of epigrams, and the novel sparkles with good-humoured teasing, joie de vivre, and clever plotting. On the back of this edition, alongside Elaine’s recommendation, Barry Humphries perspicaciously compares Ada Leverson to Jane Austen and Saki.

Another Bloomsbury Group reprint, another must-read. If you’ve been holding out, just give in and buy the lot – it’s a library of witty, wise, brilliant books which will stand the test of time, because they already have stood the test of time. And once more, kudos to Penelope Beech and her cover illustrations – both cover and Ex Libris page include silhouette illustrations of representative scenes from the novel, and add to the charm of this exceptional series. Thank you Elaine, thank you Bloomsbury.

OUP – an expression of excitement

I’ve been sorting through my shelves here in Somerset, and have managed to get rid of about 25 books – aren’t you proud of me? That’s about 2% of them. Ten or so were duplicates, but that’s still a fair few wrenched from my grasp, for various reasons… Our Vicar and Our Vicar’s Wife were doing the same thing with their shelves, and discarded quite a few duplicates (does anybody need four editions of Sense and Sensibility, one asks oneself?)

Anyway. This has suddenly become less impressive when you realise that I’ve just had a lovely box of books from Oxford University Press to review. Kirsty (blogger at Other Stories when she’s not working for OUP) sent me a catalogue and asked whether I’d like anything… so of course I sent it back, saying “No, thanks, nothing I like there…” Oh wait, no, that’s the exact opposite of what I did. I sent an enormous list, telling her to stop reading it when it got ridiculous (you don’t want to ask less than you can get, do you?) and she sent me most of them. Here they are…


I’ll be writing about them individually, bit by bit, but I thought I should bring them all to your attention now. I didn’t much like the old Oxford World’s Classics before, but since they’ve revamped the way they publish, I am absolutely in love with them. I bought most of the Virginia Woolf editions back here, and now I have all these beautiful books to read through as well:

New Grub Street – George Gissing
Casting The Runes – M.R. James
The Mayor of Casterbridge – Thomas Hardy
The Mark on the Wall and other stories – Virginia Woolf
Much Ado About Nothing – William Shakespeare
Married Love – Marie Stopes
Selected Stories – Katherine Mansfield
The Yellow Wallpaper and other stories – Charlotte Perkins Gilman
The Years – Virginia Woolf
Cecilia – Fanny Burney
Camilla – Fanny Burney


Not pictured, because I put them in a different pile, are a new edition of the Alice books by Lewis Carroll, and A Very Short Introduction to Biography by Hermione Lee.

Obviously I have read some of these before, but I’d be keen to hear any recommendations you have, or which you’d like to hear about yourselves? I’m quite tempted to sink my teeth into a novel by Burney, since I loved Evelina and haven’t followed up on it yet…. more anon.

Life According To Literature

I saw this quiz on Read-Warbler, though it’s been all over the blogosphere I believe. Looks fun and quite tricky, so I decided to give it a go… do check out her answers, and maybe follow the blog link trail back to its source…. Oh, and give it a go yourself, of course!

Using only books you have read this year (2009), answer these questions. Try not to repeat a book title. It’s a lot harder than you think!

Describe yourself: Two People (A.A. Milne)

How do you feel: Cloud Nine (Caryl Churchill)

Describe where you currently live: Forever England (Alison Light)

If you could go anywhere, where would you go: The House at Pooh Corner (A.A. Milne)

Your favorite form of transportation: Parnassus on Wheels (Christopher Morley)

Your best friend is: The Entertainer (John Osborne)

You and your friends are: Dreamers (Knut Hamsun)

What’s the weather like: Cheerful Weather For The Wedding (Julia Strachey) – and I actually went to a wedding today!

You fear: A Shot in the Dark (Saki)

What is the best advice you have to give: Say Please (Virginia Graham) – I was so tempted to choose ‘Put Out More Flags (Evelyn Waugh)’

Thought for the day: It’s Hard To Be Hip Over Thirty (Judith Viorst) – I’m finding it quite tricky *under* thirty…

How I would like to die: Tea and Tranquilisers (Dianne Harpwood) – not really! But it is an amusing title match.

My soul’s present condition: Saved (Edward Bond)

Persephone Week: The End

Apparently Persephone Week finished on Friday… but here at Stuck-in-a-Book we’re going to keep it going right until the end of the week. No Weekend Miscellany this weekend, then, but instead the final two Persephones will be proffered. (And maybe even a redux tomorrow). No, I didn’t manage to read six (though I’m quite pleased with four), but today you’re going to hear about Lettice Delmer by Susan Miles and, more excitingly, see the product of Our Vicar’s Wife’s interaction with Good Things in England by Florence White (which is also coming out in November as a Persephone Classic, with a really beautiful cover, below)


Right – Lettice Delmer, my first novel in verse, and the only one which Persephone have published. [Edit: Sorry, I forgot, Amours du Voyage by Arthur Hugh Clough is another one.] Not in rhyming verse, at least most of the time, but in blank verse. (If you need a brush up on what blank verse is, have a look here.) I bought this in a secondhand bookshop a while ago and, to be honest, I might not have bought it otherwise – like a lot of people, I suspect, the concept of a novel in verse was a little off-putting. Me more than most, since I’ve always struggled with reading poetry – probably because I read quite quickly, and poetry really needs to be read slowly, or even aloud.

But, nothing daunted, I gave Lettice Delmer (1958) a go for Persephone Reading Week. If I’m ever going to read it, thought I, now is the time. The Publisher’s Note writes that it is ‘a novel, i.e. narrative with plot, characterisation and psychological insight, where the verse form is readable, not too intrusive – but essential.’ Lettice Delmer is the privileged daughter of extremely charitable parents, who are always seeking to help others for the sake of Christ. She herself is uncertain at the welcome her parents give to Flora Tort and her young son Derrick. Flora was a patient at a Special Hospital (a euphemistic title) and her son is rather an unpredictable, savage creature – at first. The rest of this novel looks at the Delmer household; Lettice’s leaving of it, and her subsequent life of difficulties, weaknesses, loves, losses and spiritual journey. The secondary depiction of a Christian girl struggling to communicate with God, and seeking further depth in her relationship with Christ, was very honest, moving, and genuine.


The Persephone edition has a Plot Summary section at the end, giving summaries of each 10-20 pages – I occasionally flicked to it to clarify a point or two, but largely didn’t find I needed it. Its inclusion does speak volumes about an anticipated readerly response – you can’t imagine a plot summary at the end of a novel, can you? It is true that, now and then, I’d miss a pivotal event – perhaps because I read verse a little too fast, and the nature of its lay-out, with dialogue incorporated into stanzas alongside everything else, means that it’s trickier to make significant points stand out. But this didn’t happen very often, and in general, I didn’t find the verse format a problem.

I suppose that’s the central part of this review, in terms of whether or not I’ll convince others to give Lettice Delmer a try – was I able to read it? For the first thirty pages, I thought I wouldn’t be able to. It was tricky, I get stumbling, and realising I hadn’t taken in anything on the page – but then it clicked. Something suddenly worked – and, though every time I picked the novel up it would take a few lines before it clicked again, I was immersed more quickly each time.

But, of course, unobtrusive wouldn’t be good enough. If a verse format did nothing but disappear into the background, it would be pointless. Of course, Susan Miles uses it to much better effect. Difficult to pin down what the verse *does* achieve: it is more of an atmosphere than anything specific. A subtle beauty and poignancy is lent to the pages, an almost ethereal quality. The verse enables Miles to discuss hard-hitting topics such as death, suicide, abortion, and depression without this feeling at all like a gratuitously gritty novel – they are serious topics, dealt with seriously, but almost through a glass darkly.


The lines I really want to quote give away a big spoiler. So I’m going to post them in white, and you can decide whether or not to read them. Below that are two other quotations, little moments in Lettice Delmer which were illuminating examples of how the verse can be used to accurately reveal a character. The last shows just how well this book fits into the Persephone canon.

He lets the subtle Tempter’s guiding hand
direct his footsteps to the sea-dashed brink.
Not till the waters close above his head
does any plea for mercy stir in him.

* * *

“It’s want of confidence, I truly think,
that keeps him so resentful.
I’ve watched poor Flora hold a stick – quite low –
and try to make him jump.
It seemed as if he were afraid to raise
both feet at once in case when they came down
the earth would not be there!”

* * *

For Lettice insists scratchily
that aching to be in the war is a whim that merits contempt.
“You are doing far better serving at home humbly
than seeking false glory, it seems to me, Hulbert,
out on the battlefield,
for unmarked, unpraised, wholly unheroic home service
is, to my mind, self-satisfying or not self-satisfying,
much more admirable than a soldier’s blatant offering.”

To conclude, I thought I’d find Lettice Delmer impossible to read – but I was pleasantly surprised. Though it won’t become one of my favourite Persephones, the novel has a lyrical beauty for which it is worth acclimatising yourself to the unusual form. Do have a step outside your comfort zone, and give this novel a try.

Onto the second Persephone title of the post:


Our Vicar’s Wife had a flick through Good Things in England, (in its Persephone Originals edition) trying to decide what to make – the first thing she found was something involving a pig’s head, and thought not. Which is nice for me, because I’m vegetarian. Instead, she opted for gingerbread. ‘Eliza Acton’s Gingerbread’, no less, appropriately enough a recipe submitted from a Rectory. Here Mum is, holding her offering (doesn’t she look nice?)


And this is what it looked like when sliced up…. it’s even nicer than it looks. The yummiest gingerbread I’ve ever eaten, and a fitting end to Persephone Reading/Eating Week. Mmmm.

Persephone Week: Oh dear

Oh dear. It was all going so well. I went out tonight, and I’m exhausted, so will have to stop at p.120 of Lettice Delmer by Susan Miles… I have failed in my Persephone Reading Week Self-Appointed Challenge! But I never really expected to read one a day, so I’m happy enough to postpone finishing Lettice Delmer until tomorrow, and then probably lingering a few days over a rather longer Persephone title. Or maybe even call it a week, and leave the other one for a couple of weeks’ time…

So! You’ll just have to wait and see what my response is to my first novel-in-verse. (No, I shan’t say – in my best German accent – vell, it could have been verse)


And tomorrow I am going home to Somerset for a week and a bit – which will be lovely, and although my plan was to not take any books, and rely on the ones I’ve got at home, it doesn’t seem to have quite worked that way when I packed…

Persephone Week 3: The Runaway

I don’t know about you, but I’m really enjoying Persephone Reading Week. Do keep popping over to Paperback Reader and The B Files to catch up on what’s going on across the interweb, and I do hope you’ve felt encouraged to pick up your own Persephone book. Our Vicar’s Wife has promised to cook something from her copy of Good Things in England by Florence White, to celebrate the week, so hopefully I’ll be able to treat you to a picture of whatever it is, later in the week.


I wasn’t sure I’d be able to keep up to one Persephone a day, since I was out at the theatre tonight (seeing Spike Milligan’s Hitler: My Part in His Downfall – for free, because I’m under 26 – hurrah!) But I was speedy, and the book was quick, so I can add Elizabeth Ann Hart’s The Runaway to my list for the week. A children’s novel originally published in 1872, and reprinted in 1936 with over sixty wood-cuts specially made by the sublime Gwen Raverat, The Runaway has become one of my very favourite Persephones.

Both text and illustrations are quite, quite wonderful. It’s impossible to imagine them separated, and I pity the children between 1872 and 1936 who had to make do without – but more do I pity myself and all other children who didn’t get this read aloud to them in their infancy. The protagonist is Clarice, an imaginative fifteen year old (who acts more like a modern day ten year old – whether that is a sign of the times, or simply Clarice alone, I’m not sure) who regrets that her father is not the army, and in the opening line, redolent of Emma, is described: ‘Clarice Clavering – young, ardent, and happy -‘. Longing for adventure, she finds it in the form of Olga, hidden amongst the thicket. The eponymous Runaway, she persuades Clarice to allow her to hide in the house. The plot is about whether or not Olga will be discovered; whether or not she is telling the truth about her origins; what the consequences of her running away will be for all.

But, for me, the plot is less significant than the lively characters. Clarice is a fairly typical good, obedient Victorian child, but without the slightly sickening edge that certain members of the March family have for me(…) Her spirited eagerness for adventure set her apart from her less attractive compatriots. And then there is Olga! What a delight – airy, impetuous, irrepressible, and vibrant, she reminded of nothing so much as Clarissa from Edith Olivier’s The Love Child. And anybody au fait with my 50 Books You Must Read will realise what a compliment that is.


Had the text been printed alone, this would be a lovely book – but Gwen Raverat’s wood-cuts take it to the next level. I didn’t really know what wood-cuts were before I started reading Persephone Books six years ago, but now I love them. Often featured in the early Persephone Quarterlies, an article by Pat Jaffe in PQ 4 speaks of the ‘bookish, talented, visual twentieth-century women [who] have taken such delight in the intimate, intricate craft they were at last allowed to learn.’ Each of Raverat’s must have taken so long, and they are enchanting. Not twee (though personally I never find a touch of twee goes amiss) but as spirited as Olga herself.

Any parents or grandparents out there, I do encourage you to get a copy of this for your child. If you catch them at the right age, I suspect The Runaway will become a favourite for years to come. And, like all the very best children’s books, it’s one which you’ll have to buy a copy of for yourself too.