Project 24: Halfway!




Remember those naysayers, who said nay, and so forth? In fact, they said these sorts of things…
‘GOOD LUCK, Simon! I wonder how many days you’ll last? ;-)”Is that IN 2010 or AT 20:10? I think the latter is more likely.’
‘Hilarious. I’ll watch and laugh.’
‘I simply could not possibly do this. And I seriously wonder if you can.”WOW. I look forward to seeing how this pans out…..”I’m still speechless at Simon’s decision to curtail book-buying, and if the resolution were made by anyone less sincere, I would suspect a Publicity Stunt! I can hardly imagine not buying books when you live in *England,* the *home* of books”Will you keep this up now that I tell you Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters is in all good bookshops?'(and perhaps my favourite…) ‘what evs!’That’s what my faithful followers… well, I must be honest, lots of you lovely people were 100% behind me, cheering me and sending positive thoughts in my direction. And even, on occasion, forcibly dragging me away from bookshops.

But you’ll be pleased to note that, at the halfway stage, I have bought (*drum roll, if you will*) 11 books! That’s right – eleven. As in, one fewer than twelve. As in: I’m ahead of target!

And it’s not been easy. Not by a long chalk. But I will persevere… and on December 31st 2010 I shall sit back, content, proud, and happy. And on January 1st 2011, I will empty my Amazon wishlist…

Here, in no particular order, are the books that have found their way to Stuck-in-a-Book’s home in the past six months (remember that, as ever, you can click on the Project 24 picture in the top-right to see more details posts on all these books):




Teasing over…

Well, that was a bit of a tease, wasn’t it? And it feels a bit fraudulent, because the book in question has already appeared on a few others blogs… but I kept thinking of the Guernsey book and I think folk who enjoyed that will also enjoy this… right, enough hinting. Step forward… Mr. Rosenblum’s List by Natasha Solomons!

Sceptre very kindly gave me a copy of this at an authors/bloggers party, but unfortunately I didn’t manage to speak to Natasha Solomons whilst there, and now I wish I had because anybody who could write this novel must be worth knowing.

Mr. Rosenblum’s List – or Mr. Rosenblum Dreams in English if you’re looking for copies in America – has the subtitle Friendly Guidance for the Aspiring Englishman, which should give you a clue as to the book’s contents.

Jakob and Sadie Rosenblum are German Jewish refugees, escaping Nazi rule and coming to England in 1937 for safety – armed only with While you are in England: Helpful Information and Friendly Guidance for every Refugee. Jakob is incredibly keen to assimilate, and starts off by changing his name to Jack. He tries to work out what it means to be English (yes, not British, Dark Puss!) and how to fit in – adding his own bits of advice to the handbook. For example, to the rule that refugees ought always to speak English even if haltingly, he adds ‘And do not talk in a loud voice. (Unless talking to foreigners when it is the done thing to shout.)’ Of course, assimilating isn’t easy – and Solomons very wittily manages to show the Rosenblums’ difficulties without making either them or the English appear foolish. In fact, she is incredibly affectionate in both directions. It takes an intimate and thorough knowledge of the English to show these misunderstandings and misapprehensions, and Solomons (as a Dorset girl) is well able to provide.
When the Rosenblums were waiting anxiously in Berlin for their British visas, Jack had prepared for the trip by reading Byron’s poems and a Polish translation of P.G. Wodehouse. He understood only a little Polish and read the adventures of Mr. Bertie Wooster with the help of a German-Polish dictionary. It all got rather lost in translation, and the novel appeared to him a very peculiar sort of book and had dissuaded him from sampling further the pleasures of English literature.The bulk of the novel takes place eight years after World War Two. The Rosenblums have become wealthy through a carpet factory, and have relocated to Solomons’ own county Dorset (which leads to Somerset-bashing which I’ll tolerantly overlook!) Despite Jacks’s best efforts, they have not fully assimilated. Sadie is content to remember her German roots, but Jack wants them forgotten – and wants to make his daughter Elizabeth, studying at Cambridge, proud. Having almost completed his list of English attributes, there is just one item he can’t achieve: join a golf course. None will have him, once they see his surname. His solution? Why, to build his own, of course. It will be the best in the South West, and it will be in his back garden. Ignoring the unsuitability of the terrain – and the fact that he has never so much as swung a golf club – Jack ploughs all his energy, time, and money into creating this golf course… but the path of golf never did run smooth. And this is what most of Mr. Rosenblum’s List focuses upon.

Although there is a lot of humour in the novel, like Guernsey there are moments which are moving. Perhaps not to the same extent as Guernsey, where tragedy is given its own story arc, but the following section I found poignant: At the side of the house the garden reverted to scrub; the hedgerows crept forward and brambles and bright yellow gorse bushes made it impassable. The stinging nettles were five feet tall. yet butterflies landed on them effortlessly, somehow never getting stung. Sadie neither planted nor weeded; Hitler had declared the Jews weeds and plucked them out wherever he found them. She knew that a plant was only a weed if unwanted by the gardener, so she refused to move a single one, and they sprouted up wherever the wanted.Moving, no?

The Rosenblums persevere with their golf course – or rather, Jack does, as Sadie remembers her past. There is a heart-breaking scene with some photos, which I won’t spoil. Jack encounters resistance from many quarters, but also an unexpected and unusual ally in the most Dorset man in the village…

Although I often got frustrated with Jack for wasting so much money and being inconsiderate to his wife, it’s impossible not to love him. He’s a 5’3” bundle of enthusiasm and determination, unquashable and passionate. Although I could have done without the Dorset Woolly-Pig, which seemed all a bit silly, overall I thought Solomons’ debut novel was really delightful. Perhaps a little more light-hearted than Guernsey, but an interesting angle on post-war life nonetheless – and definitely something you’ll want to be reading this summer. I’m often positive about the novels featured here, so when something really special comes along I don’t know how to say “this is even BETTER than usual!” but, er, hopefully I just did… And word has it, on Solomons’ blog, that she’s been writing a screenplay…

Books to get Stuck into:

The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society – Mary Ann Shaffer: well, given the build up to today’s review, this one is hardly a surprise, is it?

Watching the English – Kate Fox: although this is pop-anthropology, rather than a novel, it’s the other book I kept being reminded of while reading Solomons’ – because it has a similarly affectionate view of the Englishman’s foibles and eccentricities.

Oops…

Sorry, that wasn’t going to be the only post yesterday, but I fell asleep at 9.30pm! And so missed the radio programme I advertised… oops.

More tonight, promise promise promise. In fact, tonight there will be a review of an essential summer read for anyone with reading taste even remotely like mine. AND it’s a new book. Not often that happens. I’m going to call it the next Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, which will either make you excited or unexcited or nonplussed….

Adieu.

Stuck-in-a-Book’s Weekend Miscellany

I thought I’d give you a couple of days to enjoy the photos – and to justify the time it took to gather them up and post them! And it’s another review-free day (although there’s a little pile waiting for my attention) because, of course, we’re going to have a book, a link, and a blog post.

1.) The book – was mentioned to me by regular blog-reader Susan (I don’t think you have a blog, do you Susan? I’ll throw a link in later if you do!) It’s called Time Was Soft There: A Paris Sojourn at Shakespeare & Co. by Jeremy Mercer, published back in 2006. It’s about Mercer’s nine months living and working at the Shakespeare & Co. bookshop, and sounds wonderful.

Oo, I’ve just done a hunt and discovered that it’s the same as Books, Baguettes and Bedbugs, just under a different title. This is an instance of the American publisher coming up with a much nicer title than the English one, don’t you think? Time Was Soft There is much more evocative, AND, though both books have cats on the cover, it is more prominent on the American edition. Case settled.


2.) The link – comes courtesy of my fellow dove, Sarah. Here it is. Fancy living in a beautiful house which was once home to ‘tangled lives of the Bloomsbury set’? (oh, Telegraph, what a way you have with euphemism). Well, Sarah and I have pooled our resources, so we’re looking for another dozen or so people to help us take this place off the market…

3.) The blog post – is Hayley at Desperate Reader and her thoughts on the Flavour Thesaurus. Niki Segnit has done with flavours something akin to the colour circle – what goes with what etc., including some surprises. I’d seen a little review of it elsewhere, but they cited parsnips and banana as an example, which made me feel sick. This would be true of parsnips with (or, indeed, without) anything. But Hayley mentions that there is a section on lime, which is me sold.

A Picture Paints A Thousand Books


I’ve been so surprised and delighted by the response I’ve had to this little idea, of posting a picture which summed up your reading tastes (the only rule being – no books allowed in the picture!) This is mine, which kicked it all off (and, as you’ll see further down the page, I cheated and included another one for me):


It was taken by my friend Cath, and I’d actually put it up in the post before it even occurred to me that it partly represented my reading. I just wanted an excuse to post a pretty picture… but you guys have had such amazing thoughts, and great explanations! Although all the links I’ve found/been sent are here, I thought – since this is a visual challenge – I’d collect up everyone’s wonderful images. The link above the picture is to the blogger in question. Not too late to get a response in, if you like… (I’m afraid it was too daunting to try and get permission from everyone – let me know if you’d rather your picture wasn’t here, and I’ll remove it. Oh, and if you put up more than one image, I’ve just picked one to represent your response. Hope that’s ok!)

Without further ado…

Watch out for The Sea, The Sea…

Ages ago I piled up a set of books to read on a week-off from studying, and (predictably enough) failed to finish all six. In fact, I’ve only recently finished the fourth of them, so let’s call it an ongoing project…

That book is The Sandcastle by Iris Murdoch, published in 1957 and Murdoch’s third novel. I’ve been meaning to read some Murdoch ever since I saw the phenomenal film Iris back in 2001 or 2002, and have accumulated a few different novels on my shelves – this one coming from the brilliant Amnesty bookshop in Bristol, always worth a trip. Why this one came off the shelf, I’m not quite sure, although my dear friend Lorna has it as one of her favourites on Facebook so perhaps that had stayed in my memory somehow.

For years I used to confuse Iris Murdoch and Ivy Compton-Burnett. Before I’d read either of them, that is – somehow, in my mind, they were similar authors. It was only later, after having read and adored ICB, that I realised the general view was that ICB was difficult to enjoy, and Iris Murdoch was very good but much more accessible. Well, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I wish to disagree. This reader found Iris Murdoch much less accessible than ICB, and – although I could see that The Sandcastle was a good novel, and found certain sections gripping and brilliantly observed, overall I must confess it was… a bit of a slog.

Before I go any further, I must concede practicalities – the font in my copy was tiny, and I did get a headache when reading the novel. Such things ought not fetter learned critics, naturally, but… I am not a learned critic, and I was fettered. Recently I read Images in a Mirror by Sigrid Undset (which I’ll hopefully write about at some point) which had such a large font that I found myself reading the novel far too quickly and not taking in the details – prosaic issues such as font can really affect a reading experience, don’t you think? Is that just me?

But back to the novel in question. The Sandcastle takes place in a boarding school. Mor has taught there for years, and lives on site with his wife Nan and their two children. Murdoch is masterful at the brief incidents or asides which sum up a relationship. Everything you need to know about Mor and Nan’s marriage is presented here: Liffy had been their dog, a golden retriever, who was killed two years ago on the main road. This animal had formed the bond between Mor and Nan which their children had been unable to form. Half unconsciously, whenever Mor wanted to placate his wife he said something about Liffey. To make matters worse, along comes a painter called Rain. Her task is to paint the retiring headmaster Demoyte – ‘As for morality, and such things, Demoyte took the view that if a boy could look after his Latin prose his character would look after itself.’ That sort of man. I love it when authors write about artists – so often they use this to explore the idea of artistic creation… and I find talented painters, especially portraitists, fascinating.
“When you go,” said Demoyte, “you will leave behind a picture of me, whereas what I shall be wanting is a picture of you.”

“Every portrait is a self-portrait,” said Rain. “In portraying you I portray myself.”

“Spiritual nonsense,” said Demoyte. “I want to see your flesh, not your soul.”But Rain’s role is not just as resident painter. As the cracks in Mor and Nan’s marriage become more evident, Mor falls in love with Rain…

And so The Sandcastle unfolds, with this evolving love affair and the various reactions to it. In fact, the novel’s not as sensational as that sounds – a lot of pages meander through emotions and everyday events, rather than drop-a-vase-on-the-floor shocks and surprises.

Something Murdoch does very well, on the strength of this novel anyway, is the big set pieces. The scenes which really stay in the memory. I can think of quite a few sections which are excellently structured, with appropriate climaxes and nuances; pathos and bathos, so on and so forth. A car is edging towards a river and falls in; a boy must be rescued from the tower; Nan finds out about her husband’s affair and can’t stop hiccoughing. These are all brilliant scenes, incredibly well written not simply sentence by sentence, but on a wider, structural level. But – oh yes, but – between the big set pieces, this novel rambles interminably. Perhaps, as I said above, it’s simply the fault of the font… but I found so much of The Sandcastle difficult to wade through. Not that it was badly written as such, indeed she writes conversations about love well (and that is difficult, judging by some books I’ve read) but there are so many pages which felt like a chore. Not much happening, on the level of plot or character. I don’t mind plotless sections – I welcome it – but only if there is something to captivate my attention.

I don’t know about you, but my opinions when reading (and consequently my reviews) are probably more generous to authors of whom I’ve heard nothing. So you might see quite enthusiastic reviews for writers I know won’t enter any sort of canon – doesn’t stop them being good reads, of course, but I lay no claim to them having lasting notoriety. Whereas with Iris Murdoch… I know before picking up the book that she has a great reputation, so I’m expecting more. If she was a complete unknown, I daresay I’d be bowled over by her prose at times, and definitely enthusiastic about those occasional scenes of brilliance. But, without doing down these attributes, I must confess I’d hoped for much more. I’d hoped I’d love Murdoch and rush out to read more – as it is, I’m not sure when I’ll return to Iris.

Do her later novels fulfil the promise which is undoubtedly here? Or does Murdoch always have great scenes with a lot of filler? Fulfil or full of filler – that’s what I need to know before I venture further…

Books to get Stuck into:

The Honours Board – Pamela Hansford Johnson : I haven’t blogged about this novel, but it’s good. Also set in a school, there is a cleverly drawn cast of teachers, assistants, and pupils in a boarding school keen to gain prestige.

Pastors and Masters – Ivy Compton-Burnett
: another school setting, and ICB-lite, this novella is a great litmus test to see whether or not you’ll get on with Dame Ivy – as well as an adroit depiction of schoolmaster rivalries.

(P.S. Apologies for the big gap in the middle of this – are any other Blogger users having trouble with puttings pictures in the bottom half of posts?)

A Taste of Saki

I was chatting to Elaine from Random Jottings the other day (in person, no less!) about short stories and suchlike, and I discovered that she hadn’t read any Saki. I’d recently been reminded of him via Kirsty‘s Facebook page (thanks, Kirsty!) Quick as a quite-contemplatively-slow flash, I emailed Elaine a link to a Saki short story. Any would do, but I went with ‘The Schartz-Metterklume Method’. Saki’s stories are very short, very funny, and rather biting – but always on the right side of malicious. Very spikey, though, and exactly my sort of thing. I’m sure he’ll work for some of you too (and doubtless not for others, but such is life) – and since he’s long out of copyright, I feel no qualms in reproducing ‘The Schartz-Metterklume Method’ for your delectation and delight. If you like it (and, indeed, if you don’t) it’s from a collection called Beasts and Super-Beasts, which is well worth getting.


The Schartz-Metterklume Method

Lady Carlotta stepped out on to the platform of the small wayside station and took a turn or two up and down its uninteresting length, to kill time till the train should be pleased to proceed on its way. Then, in the roadway beyond, she saw a horse struggling with a more than ample load, and a carter of the sort that seems to bear a sullen hatred against the animal that helps him to earn a living. Lady Carlotta promptly betook her to the roadway, and put rather a different complexion on the struggle. Certain of her acquaintances were wont to give her plentiful admonition as to the undesirability of interfering on behalf of a distressed animal, such interference being “none of her business.” Only once had she put the doctrine of non-interference into practice, when one of its most eloquent exponents had been besieged for nearly three hours in a small and extremely uncomfortable may-tree by an angry boar-pig, while Lady Carlotta, on the other side of the fence, had proceeded with the water-colour sketch she was engaged on, and refused to interfere between the boar and his prisoner. It is to be feared that she lost the friendship of the ultimately rescued lady. On this occasion she merely lost the train, which gave way to the first sign of impatience it had shown throughout the journey, and steamed off without her. She bore the desertion with philosophical indifference; her friends and relations were thoroughly well used to the fact of her luggage arriving without her. She wired a vague non-committal message to her destination to say that she was coming on “by another train.” Before she had time to think what her next move might be she was confronted by an imposingly attired lady, who seemed to be taking a prolonged mental inventory of her clothes and looks.

“You must be Miss Hope, the governess I’ve come to meet,” said the apparition, in a tone that admitted of very little argument.

“Very well, if I must I must,” said Lady Carlotta to herself with dangerous meekness.

“I am Mrs. Quabarl,” continued the lady; “and where, pray, is your luggage?”

“It’s gone astray,” said the alleged governess, falling in with the excellent rule of life that the absent are always to blame; the luggage had, in point of fact, behaved with perfect correctitude. “I’ve just telegraphed about it,” she added, with a nearer approach to truth.

“How provoking,” said Mrs. Quabarl; “these railway companies are so careless. However, my maid can lend you things for the night,” and she led the way to her car.

During the drive to the Quabarl mansion Lady Carlotta was impressively introduced to the nature of the charge that had been thrust upon her; she learned that Claude and Wilfrid were delicate, sensitive young people, that Irene had the artistic temperament highly developed, and that Viola was something or other else of a mould equally commonplace among children of that class and type in the twentieth century.

“I wish them not only to be TAUGHT,” said Mrs. Quabarl, “but INTERESTED in what they learn. In their history lessons, for instance, you must try to make them feel that they are being introduced to the life-stories of men and women who really lived, not merely committing a mass of names and dates to memory. French, of course, I shall expect you to talk at meal-times several days in the week.”

“I shall talk French four days of the week and Russian in the remaining three.”

“Russian? My dear Miss Hope, no one in the house speaks or understands Russian.”

“That will not embarrass me in the least,” said Lady Carlotta coldly.

Mrs. Quabarl, to use a colloquial expression, was knocked off her perch. She was one of those imperfectly self-assured individuals who are magnificent and autocratic as long as they are not seriously opposed. The least show of unexpected resistance goes a long way towards rendering them cowed and apologetic. When the new governess failed to express wondering admiration of the large newly-purchased and expensive car, and lightly alluded to the superior advantages of one or two makes which had just been put on the market, the discomfiture of her patroness became almost abject. Her feelings were those which might have animated a general of ancient warfaring days, on beholding his heaviest battle-elephant ignominiously driven off the field by slingers and javelin throwers.

At dinner that evening, although reinforced by her husband, who usually duplicated her opinions and lent her moral support generally, Mrs. Quabarl regained none of her lost ground. The governess not only helped herself well and truly to wine, but held forth with considerable show of critical knowledge on various vintage matters, concerning which the Quabarls were in no wise able to pose as authorities. Previous governesses had limited their conversation on the wine topic to a respectful and doubtless sincere expression of a preference for water. When this one went as far as to recommend a wine firm in whose hands you could not go very far wrong Mrs. Quabarl thought it time to turn the conversation into more usual channels.

“We got very satisfactory references about you from Canon Teep,” she observed; “a very estimable man, I should think.”

“Drinks like a fish and beats his wife, otherwise a very lovable character,” said the governess imperturbably.

“MY DEAR Miss Hope! I trust you are exaggerating,” exclaimed the Quabarls in unison.

“One must in justice admit that there is some provocation,” continued the romancer. “Mrs. Teep is quite the most irritating bridge-player that I have ever sat down with; her leads and declarations would condone a certain amount of brutality in her partner, but to souse her with the contents of the only soda-water syphon in the house on a Sunday afternoon, when one couldn’t get another, argues an indifference to the comfort of others which I cannot altogether overlook. You may think me hasty in my judgments, but it was practically on account of the syphon incident that I left.”

“We will talk of this some other time,” said Mrs. Quabarl hastily.

“I shall never allude to it again,” said the governess with decision.

Mr. Quabarl made a welcome diversion by asking what studies the new instructress proposed to inaugurate on the morrow.

“History to begin with,” she informed him.

“Ah, history,” he observed sagely; “now in teaching them history you must take care to interest them in what they learn. You must make them feel that they are being introduced to the life-stories of men and women who really lived – “

“I’ve told her all that,” interposed Mrs. Quabarl.

“I teach history on the Schartz-Metterklume method,” said the governess loftily.

“Ah, yes,” said her listeners, thinking it expedient to assume an acquaintance at least with the name.

* * * *

“What are you children doing out here?” demanded Mrs. Quabarl the next morning, on finding Irene sitting rather glumly at the head of the stairs, while her sister was perched in an attitude of depressed discomfort on the window-seat behind her, with a wolf-skin rug almost covering her.

“We are having a history lesson,” came the unexpected reply. “I am supposed to be Rome, and Viola up there is the she-wolf; not a real wolf, but the figure of one that the Romans used to set store by – I forget why. Claude and Wilfrid have gone to fetch the shabby women.”

“The shabby women?”

“Yes, they’ve got to carry them off. They didn’t want to, but Miss Hope got one of father’s fives-bats and said she’d give them a number nine spanking if they didn’t, so they’ve gone to do it.”

A loud, angry screaming from the direction of the lawn drew Mrs. Quabarl thither in hot haste, fearful lest the threatened castigation might even now be in process of infliction. The outcry, however, came principally from the two small daughters of the lodge-keeper, who were being hauled and pushed towards the house by the panting and dishevelled Claude and Wilfrid, whose task was rendered even more arduous by the incessant, if not very effectual, attacks of the captured maidens’ small brother. The governess, fives-bat in hand, sat negligently on the stone balustrade, presiding over the scene with the cold impartiality of a Goddess of Battles. A furious and repeated chorus of “I’ll tell muvver” rose from the lodge-children, but the lodge-mother, who was hard of hearing, was for the moment immersed in the preoccupation of her washtub.

After an apprehensive glance in the direction of the lodge (the good woman was gifted with the highly militant temper which is sometimes the privilege of deafness) Mrs. Quabarl flew indignantly to the rescue of the struggling captives.

“Wilfrid! Claude! Let those children go at once. Miss Hope, what on earth is the meaning of this scene?”

“Early Roman history; the Sabine Women, don’t you know? It’s the Schartz-Metterklume method to make children understand history by acting it themselves; fixes it in their memory, you know. Of course, if, thanks to your interference, your boys go through life thinking that the Sabine women ultimately escaped, I really cannot be held responsible.”

“You may be very clever and modern, Miss Hope,” said Mrs. Quabarl firmly, “but I should like you to leave here by the next train. Your luggage will be sent after you as soon as it arrives.”

“I’m not certain exactly where I shall be for the next few days,” said the dismissed instructress of youth; “you might keep my luggage till I wire my address. There are only a couple of trunks and some golf-clubs and a leopard cub.”

“A leopard cub!” gasped Mrs. Quabarl. Even in her departure this extraordinary person seemed destined to leave a trail of embarrassment behind her.

“Well, it’s rather left off being a cub; it’s more than half-grown, you know. A fowl every day and a rabbit on Sundays is what it usually gets. Raw beef makes it too excitable. Don’t trouble about getting the car for me, I’m rather inclined for a walk.”

And Lady Carlotta strode out of the Quabarl horizon.

The advent of the genuine Miss Hope, who had made a mistake as to the day on which she was due to arrive, caused a turmoil which that good lady was quite unused to inspiring. Obviously the Quabarl family had been woefully befooled, but a certain amount of relief came with the knowledge.

“How tiresome for you, dear Carlotta,” said her hostess, when the overdue guest ultimately arrived; “how very tiresome losing your train and having to stop overnight in a strange place.”

“Oh dear, no,” said Lady Carlotta; “not at all tiresome – for me.”

Musical Musing

Karen at Cornflower has set people a music challenge – list/upload their five favourite songs beginning with a letter which she pulls out of a Scrabble bag. Sounds like fun, does it not, and my letter was… P.

Now, there’s very little guarantee that shared book tastes lead to shared music tastes, especially since I hardly ever listen to classical music, and never opera, and am probably rather alone in that in terms of bloggers. But I thought I’d give it a go nonetheless. Some of my favourites don’t appear to be on YouTube (like Papercut Words by Elin Sigvardsson and Peace by Jennifer Knapp) so I limited to those for which I could find videos… some of these aren’t official videos but fan-made ones, so apologies if they’re a bit weird. Anyway, it was tricky but… here we go! If you want to have a go yourself, go to Karen’s post here.

1.) The Part Where You Let Go – Hem
(I thought I’d apply the articles-don’t-count rule beloved by libraries everywhere)

2.) Protection – Massive Attack ft. Tracey Thorn

3.) Pretty Good Year – Tori Amos

4.) Paper Cup – Heather Nova

5.) Praise, My Soul, The King of Heaven