Cinderella Goes To The Morgue by Nancy Spain

Image from here.
Sadly no d/w with my copy.

In amongst all the excitement of a new issue of Shiny New Books, I’ve remembered about a little pile of books that have been waiting a while to be reviewed. Most of them are books I started before my reader’s block, and staggeringly finished some time later – such as Nancy Spain’s Cinderella Goes To The Morgue.

I posted about Nancy Spain back in April, after coming across mention of her in a re-read of Ann Thwaite’s wonderful biography of A.A. Milne, and asked if anybody had read her detective novels. There was quite a lot of interest, and Scott was even reading one as he wrote. Karen later followed up with a lovely review of Poison For Teacher, but I was lagging behind. I bought a copy of one of her books which filled a gap in A Century of Books, and eventually managed to finish Cinderella Goes To The Morgue (1950), which came somewhere in the middle of her detective novel output.

It stars her ‘detective’ (not much detecting seems to go on), the lovely Russian Natasha DuVivien. We know Natasha is lovely because we are told so more or less every time she does anything – and she does a lot more of crossing and uncrossing her lovely legs than she does anything else. She is a rather enchanting mix of naive and worldly-wise, never nonplussed but also a little detached from the doings of lesser mortals. And, being a Russian in a 1950 novel, she is always having the most curious syntax:

“I am so sure,” said Natasha, “that you are right. But what motive could anyone ever have for killing another person? It is always worrying me. Unless, of course, they are mad people,” she added vaguely, looking out of her window. 

Her breath made a little fog of its own on the glass, within the world, yet not of it. 

“Oh,” said Mr Atkins briskly, “jealously, ma’am. Jealousy and passion and hate. And greed. The usual things.” 

“The Seven Deadly Sins,” said Miriam gently. “Lust and anger. Any of them, in fact, barring sloth.”

This excerpt hopefully demonstrates the archness of Spain’s writing (I love that ‘within the world, yet not of it’ – a sort of paraphrase of John 17:16 – and how many authors would say it of foggy breath on glass?) and also serves to introduce us to Miriam. She is Natasha’s slightly more worldly (and, it has to be said, slightly less lovely) friend. And it is she who gets them tangled up in the local pantomime.

The title is a bit of a red herring. Early on in the book, it is actually Prince Charming who pays an unexpected visit to the morgue – and Miriam steps into her shoes. She isn’t the last body to be carted out of the theatre (the show must go on), but the murder mystery plot is really incidental to the novel. It’s not an Agatha Christie situation, where whodunnit is paramount – and brilliant. In Cinderella Goes To The Morgue it is neither. The solution is cursory and unconvincing, but that really isn’t the point. My favourite sections, indeed, were those which didn’t deal with the murder mystery, such as:

Outside some shrill little voices were suddenly raised in screaming and breathless information about ‘Good King Wenceslas’.

“How odd it is being,” said Natasha inconsequently, “that this old man who is once looking out of a window and that is absolutely oll I know about him.”

“He was deep and crisp and even for a start,” said Timothy.

“No, no,” said Natasha. “That was his page.”

I loved these interludes, and only wish there had been more of them. Spain often sneaks in unexpected words or slightly silly descriptions of things, in the middle of a police questioning or a discussion about potential murderers, which are easy to miss if one isn’t careful. I’m going to keep coming back to that word ‘arch’, but it describes Spain perfectly.  I’d have quite liked her to take it up a notch or two more, so that the novel was a step nearer farce, but she still has plenty of fun satirising the detective novel (“Look at her now! She deserves to be murdered“) and the theatrical world. Although my dramatic ventures have gone no further than the village stage, I still loved her riffs on people who abuse the limelight:

“Hampton,” said Tony Gresham suddenly. “Hampton has given Mic and Mac carte blanche to ad. lib. in the Baron’s Kitchen. Isn’t it dreadful?”

Miriam paused in the act of tucking her hair into a superb white wig with side curls.

“No!” she cried horrified. “You can’t mean it. Well, we’ll be lucky if this pantomime is over by one in the morning. Very lucky.”
There are a whole host of characters I’ve not mentioned at all, from angry producers to the delightfully appalling ‘Tiny Tots’ (and their aggressive Stage Mothers). All the ingredients are there – I have to confess, though, that the novel didn’t quite live up to the sum of its parts. I very much enjoyed it, but had hoped it would become a book to add to my 50 Books List… I don’t want to add on a negative note, and I can’t pinpoint any reason why this isn’t an all-time favourite, but I also don’t want to oversell it!  But anybody with an interest in arch detective fiction and mid-century silliness could do a lot worse than tracking down Nancy Spain. Do report back if you do!

Shiny New Books: competition

And my first post about a specific Shiny New Books item is to point you towards the competition on the homepage – you can win copies of the editors’ favourite books from Issue 2 (including my choice of Tove Jansson’s The Listener) by telling us about your favourite independent bookseller. Go over and enter – and, whilst you’re there, have an explore!

Shiny New Books: Issue 2!

It is with excitement, pleasure, and pride that I announce that Issue 2 of Shiny New Books is now live! We have new colours, new images, a new competition, and – most importantly – lots and lots of new reviews and features.

Image borrowed from co-editor Annabel

I’m excited about reading it, because I’ve only seen the pieces I wrote, edited, or proofread – and there are over 100 posts to read in total. (If you’ve written for us, or sent a book, we’ll be in touch separately – but it might not be immediately, with so many lovely people to contact.)

I’ll be pointing towards things I’ve written over the next few weeks, and some other personal highlights, but for now – go and browse!

Once again, a hearty and affectionate ‘thank you’ to Annabel, Harriet, and Victoria, my co-editors – and equally hearty apologies that I napped through our Skype appointment yesterday, and final adjustments were thus made later than intended…

Your posts were brought by the letters…

Long overdue, sorrrry, but here is a round-up of your posts following that meme I made up the other day! Sorry that I didn’t manage to comment on them individually (I really did mean to, but it was such a busy week) – I loved seeing them, and hope you all had fun.  It was only while putting this list together that I realised how far it had spread!  Every link went off to more and more… oh, and some are in the comments of the original post.

(I’ve based this off the comment section on that post and those I could find; if I’ve missed yours, let me know and I’ll add it. Or, if you’ve not put it up yet, let me know when you do!)

A
Becky’s Book Reviews

B
Nonsuch Book
Books as Food
My Reader’s Block

C
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

D
Annabel’s House of Books 
Reading, Writing, Working, Playing

E
Mrs Ford’s Diary
Colin’s Online Diary
With My Book and a Quilt

F
Bookpuddle
Harriet Devine
Natalie Hearts Books

G
Wordy Evidence of the Fact
Catching Happiness
The Captive Reader
Reading is not the Challenge

H
So Many Books
LindyLit

I
Dolce Bellezza
Our Vicar’s Wife

J
For the Love of Stories

K
Anakalian Whims
An Adventure in Reading

L
Books Please

M
Lakeside Musing

N
The Indextrious Reader
What’s With Today, Today?

O
Lark Writes
The Emerald City Book Review

P
Peacocks and Sunflowers
Q

R
Travellin’ Penguin 

S
Snow Feathers

T
A Work in Progress
Books and Buttons
Carol S

U
Claire Thinking
Samara’s Thoughts

V
Our Vicar (in comments section)

W
Angela Young
Little Thoughts About Books

X

Y

Z
James Reads Books

Half a Century of Books

Six months in, let’s assess where I am with A Century of Books. You may remember that at the three month point I had only read 22, and was a little behind.  Well, at halfway, I have read… 51!  Yes, ironically my Reader’s Block meant turning to Agatha Christie, and I can wolf those down in a couple of days, so she filled plenty of places in the century.

Let’s take a look decade by decade…

1914-1923: 6
1924-1933: 7
1934-1943: 6
1944-1953: 9
1954-1963: 4
1964-1973: 6
1974-1983: 5
1984-1993: 4
1994-2003: 1
2004-2013: 3

How are you getting on, if you’re doing the Century of Books?

A weekend away

It’s been great fun seeing the letter meme travel around the blogosphere – I haven’t had time to interact with anybody’s list, but I will do so when I can.

I spent this weekend in the Lake District, going to my dear friend Epsie’s wedding (Epsie is the nickname I use, rather than an unusal name… and she calls me Bill).  I managed not to take any photos of the wedding day (oops) but did take some of the Youth Hostel I was staying in, in Hawskhead.  It had pretty stunning views.

It was also – albeit very briefly – the residence of Francis Brett Young. It’s not the first time I’ve stayed in this hostel, or the first time I’ve noticed this plaque, but I don’t think I’ve ever mentioned him here.  He’s one of those authors I see a lot in secondhand bookshops (particularly while hunting out E.H. Young) but have never read. Has anybody read anything by him?

I read 3.5 books over the weekend, with long train journeys, but in the hostel grounds I was reading a (probably, for this spate, final) Agatha – as I have it out of the library: Sparkling Cyanide (1945). An enjoyable premise, a slightly far-fetched conclusion, some interesting characters… not her finest, not her worst.

Today’s post is brought to you by the letter…

Here’s something that should be fun – and do get involved in the comment section! – I’m going to kick off a meme where we say our favourite book, author, song, film, and object beginning with a particular letter. And that letter will be randomly assigned to you by me, via random.org. If you’d like to join in, comment in the comment section and I’ll tell you your letter! (And then, of course, the chain can keep going on your blog.)  My letter is… M

Favourite book…

Miss Hargreaves by Frank Baker. This could hardly have worked out better for me, could it?  Promise I didn’t cheat.

Favourite author…


This is all a bit suspicious, since I’ve managed to have my favourite novel and favourite author, A.A. Milne. Well, I might quibble over AAM being definitely my favourite author, but there’s no doubt that he’s my favourite whose name begins with ‘M’.

Favourite song…

A trickier choice – I nearly went with Rachel Yamagata’s ‘Miles on a Car’ – but Amelia Curran’s ‘The Mistress’ is just so darn brilliant.  No idea where the bizarre image comes from…

Favourite film…


Yes, Mrs. Miniver is madly over the top, but it’s a classic for a reason.

Favourite object…




Mugs, you are the bearers of tea, so you are my favourite M-objects.

That was fun! Do ask for a letter, if you’d like one, and I’ll do a round-up post of your responses at some point…