The Wedding Group by Elizabeth Taylor – #1968Club

When I was going through the 1968 titles I had for the 1968 Club, I spotted that there was an Elizabeth Taylor there that I don’t hear all that much about. And that’s probably going to change this week, of course! But The Wedding Group – one of her final novels – is one that I knew nothing at all about. I must have read a review or two occasionally, but it hadn’t stuck. And I thought – why not?

I don’t consider myself an Elizabeth Taylor superfan, though her writing is impeccable, and I truly love some of her novels. And yet, despite no superfan status, I seem to have read almost all of her novels. Spoilers for how I feel about this one: it’s not her best, but it’s good. My early sense is that it’s not going to remain with me in the way that others have done. But I read it on a plane, and that’s never an ideal reading scenario, so… take this review with a pinch of salt??

It starts with a description of a many-layered family in Quayne that we don’t end up seeing that much of – it’s more of a restrictive, mistrustful background to illustrate the world that Cressy has come from. It’s an artistic world – the blurb to my Virago edition tells me that the grandfather of the clan is based on Augustus John (though Chris’s post mentions other potentials) – but it’s one that is instinctively wary of elite intellectual sets, modern life, and everything that Cressy longs to explore. Mostly, she wants to escape her oppressive mother Rose. And the vision of what she wants to experience is very 1968:

It was to that world beyond the beech woods that Cressy was looking. She dreamed of Wimpy Bars and a young man with a sports car, of cheap and fashionable clothes that would fall apart before she tired of them. In that world she might find a place for herself.

She rebels and gets a job in an antiques shop – which isn’t exactly the quintessence of teenage rebellion in 1968, but is, on the other hand, very Elizabeth Taylor. There she (re-)meets David, a journalist in his 30s who has previously visited Quayne and written about the family with some superior mild distaste. Indeed, he has wrongly labelled her in a photograph, and received a letter from her putting him right – he obviously thinks she is self-conscious, silly, and odd. What he doesn’t realise is that he is all those things too, in a slightly different way.

The strength of the novel, I think, is in the drawing of David’s mother Midge. As the novel starts, he lives with her – only later does he move (though no further than next door), and grows to question her influence on him. He feels that he cannot go to London, as he dreams of doing, because she is scared to be on her own – his father lives not too far away, oblivious and indifferent to the pain his selfishness has caused the family.

As with The Soul of Kindness, where Taylor shows us the real imprisoning agony of being a hypochondriac, in Midge we see a compassionate depiction of a woman whose terror of being alone is real – while still exasperating to those around her. In one scene, Midge believes she is about to be burgled – she leaves her jewellery on the stairs, and cowers in fear upstairs. It’s very moving, and shows that nothing is one-sided – for Midge is also a restrictive force when it comes to her son, though without the intentional stifling of Quayne. Rather, it is her need of him that has kept him tied to her apron strings. This is the fascinating relationship of the novel.

Oh, incidentally, I love when Taylor allows her own authorial comments to seep through. This is rather brilliant – I quote both paragraphs because it shows Taylor’s observational powers, and the way she makes the ordinary seem bizarrely profound – as well as the disjoint between what people are doing and the thoughts they vocalise:

The sandwiches they had ordered were now put in front of them, and Nell lifted a corner of one of hers and peered short-sightedly inside – hard-boiled egg, sliced, with dark rings round the yolk, a scattering of cress, black seeds as well.

“The reason, they say, that women novelists can’t write about men, is because they don’t know what they’re like when they’re alone together, what they talk about and so on. But I can’t think why they don’t know. I seem to hear them booming away all the time. Just listen to this lot, next to me.”

So, there is a lot to admire and appreciate in The Wedding Group, and it’s possible that I’d be raving about it if I’d never read another Taylor novel. But I almost take her writing talent and perceptiveness for granted – and this novel has too many scenes (and, dare I say, characters) that don’t quite go anywhere, and don’t leave much of a mark. Or perhaps it’s just because I read most of it on a plane, who knows. Unfair to judge her by her own standard, perhaps, but I don’t think 1968 was quite Taylor’s year – though, equally, she is incapable of writing a bad novel.

7 thoughts on “The Wedding Group by Elizabeth Taylor – #1968Club

  • November 4, 2017 at 9:07 am
    Permalink

    I’ve read this and reviewed it some years ago but the review seems to have disappeared. I remember enjoying it but I agree it’s not her best.

    Reply
  • November 4, 2017 at 5:12 pm
    Permalink

    This is one of Taylor’s novels I have read only once – most of them I have read twice. It’s also the one that I remember least well. I seem to remember it as being quite Murdocian in some ways (that community of artists make me think that perhaps) and definitely very late 60s. I should probably revisit it. Probably not her best novel.

    Reply
  • November 4, 2017 at 6:36 pm
    Permalink

    I like this one but it’s not one of her core ones with a monster in, I suppose. I did like the Murdochian echoes around escaping from an artists’ commune, too, though it also now reminds me of that Mary Hocking with the father who was a novelist (Ali will know which one I mean).

    Reply
  • November 5, 2017 at 2:30 pm
    Permalink

    It’s interesting what you say about not being a Taylor super-fan but reading all her novels – I can see myself falling into exactly the same category (I’ve read about half at the moment, though not this one). I think it’s simply the knowledge she will not let you down.

    Reply
  • November 5, 2017 at 5:35 pm
    Permalink

    I feel the same way about Taylor. I respect her writing but am not a super fan. Maybe because her novels are so stark.

    Reply
  • November 7, 2017 at 8:25 pm
    Permalink

    What a terrific passage you’ve quoted. This isn’t one of hers that I find it easy to recall but, coincidentally, I read it while travelling, too (a long bus ride, not a plane ride). Perhaps it’s time for another go…

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Kay Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: