None-Go-By by Mrs Alfred Sidgwick

In Mrs Alfred Sidgwick’s 1923 novel, None-Go-By is the fanciful title of the Cornish cottage that Mary and Thomas decide to move to, to escape the hustle and bustle of relatives, friends and neighbours and their lives in London. Mary is our narrator, and describes how their lives have been taken over by the demands made by others – and this is intended to be something of an escape.

The cottage was so small that Thomas and I never quite got over the impression of living in a doll’s house; but, if Thomas was careful, he could stand upright in the rooms. He is a thin, tallish man with a saint-like expression that he thinks must have come on him gradually through being married to me; and even when he is out at elbows he has a way of looking presentable. What he ought to have done was entertain Mrs Lomax while I escaped upstairs and made myself tidy; but on the wrong occasion Thomas will often act with disconcerting suddenness. In this case he threw open the door of the room that contained our visitor, and there we were confronting each other. My first thought was that the room could hardly contain anything else. However, we squeezed in.

Thomas writes books with titles like The Physiological Correlate of the Instinctive Process. Mary doesn’t pretend to understand his work, but has her own interests – including less niche books and gardening. The novel opens amusingly, and the tone reminded me rather of Diary of a Provincial Lady by E.M. Delafield – justifiably a classic, and perhaps a touchstone for a certain sort of middle-class, middlebrow humour that I love from the period.

As is perhaps inevitable in a comic novel where a couple are trying to avoid demanding relatives and neighbours, they are continually inundated with both. There is a succession of nephews, nieces, and the like who come with their all-important personal problems or a need to be distracted. A niece has left her husband, or so she believes; a young nephew floods the garden while supposedly convalescing after illness. Each comes with their own trials that Mary, as narrator, relates as comedies rather than tragedies. There is no genuine pathos in None-Go-By, nor is there intended to be.

Mary and Thomas get to know the neighbours, of whom or two are not objectionable. A snobbish character tries to hector them into keeping certain company; another unpleasant character thinks they aren’t artistic enough to remain where they are. The stakes remain low because Mary doesn’t take anything too seriously – the reader can’t really feel genuine emotions when the characters don’t seem to.

I quite enjoyed reading None-Go-By, but I did have a couple of pretty big reservations that stopped me loving the book – as I’d thought I might, when I started it. The first is hinted above – relatives and friends come and go, neighbours are introduced and sidelined, and it gives the novel a really episodic feel. We don’t really get to know a visitor until their little crisis is resolved and they’re on their way. It all emphasises the fact that Mary and Thomas can’t truly escape the maelstrom of their lives, but I found it meant the novel lost something in the way of momentum.

The other thing was Thomas. Jane wrote a very enthusiastic review of None-Go-By seven years ago, and in it she writes ‘I had to smile at gentle marital bickering between Thomas and Mary; for all that each tried to have the last word it was clear that they were two very different people who loved each other and accepted each others little foibles.’ They certainly bicker, but I have to say I found Thomas too infuriating to smile at it. Where the Provincial Lady’s husband Robert is oblivious, Thomas is astonishingly selfish and thoughtless. He often blames Mary for the chaos he causes, disregards her expressed wishes, and never thinks of anything except his own contentedness. Mary does rather roll her eyes and move on, but I think Sidgwick overplayed the card of ‘aren’t husbands absent-minded?’. It was hard to see why Mary would even want to remain married to him.

So – I started off really loving this novel, and thought it could be a real winner. And I ended up a little disappointed.

This is my second novel by Mrs Alfred Sidgwick, and I enjoyed Cynthia’s Way – and there is enough that I liked in the tone of this novel that I’m keen to read more by her. There was just some elements to this one that jarred, while also feeling a little drab. But I feel curiously confident that there will be a book waiting for me among her output that will hit the sweet spot and become a cherished favourite. Now I just have to keep exploring…

8 thoughts on “None-Go-By by Mrs Alfred Sidgwick

  • October 24, 2021 at 8:17 am
    Permalink

    Simon – another one that sounds right up my alley says she feverishly clicking on websites to track her down

    Reply
    • October 28, 2021 at 11:41 am
      Permalink

      She was certainly prolific!

      Reply
  • October 24, 2021 at 3:10 pm
    Permalink

    Interesting… I think that Thomas would annoy me as well, from what you say. Lovely review, as ever!

    Reply
    • October 28, 2021 at 11:41 am
      Permalink

      Thanks Davida!

      Reply
  • October 24, 2021 at 7:54 pm
    Permalink

    Intriguing, Simon. I think I might well have wanted to slap Thomas, which is a shame because her writing sound rather lovely!

    Reply
    • October 28, 2021 at 11:40 am
      Permalink

      Yes, I am hopeful that the perfect book by her is out there somewhere

      Reply
  • October 25, 2021 at 9:31 pm
    Permalink

    Sounds pretty ghastly; I must say I have little time for books where the main theme appears to be man (usually, invariably?) with head in the clouds, supported by long suffering partner (usually female). As an academic I get rather tired with the trope that “we” are somehow excused normal social behaviour and an appropriate sharing of life’s responsibilities. Such selfishness that appears to be evidenced from your review is certainly not “a little foible”. A thoughtful review of a book I can so easily avoid now. Sorry it did not live up to your hopes for it.

    Reply
    • October 28, 2021 at 11:37 am
      Permalink

      Well said, Peter!

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: